Delhi Orders Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raj Kumar vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1211/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9418/2026RAJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pushyamitra Vyas with Mr. D.K. Verma and Mr. Kanhaiya Kumar, Advocates.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with W/SI Manju, PS Sagarpur and W/SI Vinod Kapoor, FRRO.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 30.03.20261. Applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 502/2024 dated23.08.2024, registered at Police Station Sagar Pur, for commission of offences under Section 64(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 (corresponding Section 376 IPC) and Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012.2. A perusal of the present matter would indicate that the applicant hereinhad lastly prayed for bail before the learned Court of Sessions in August, 2025 and his such application was dismissed on 30.08.2025. It is informed that victim and another material pu...
Goraya Straw Board Mills Pvt. Ltd. vs Shri Ganesh Paper Trading Co.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 30th March, 2026 + CM(M) 663/2026GORAYA STRAW BOARD MILLS PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Joshi and Mr. Gurjas Narula, Advocates.versusSHRI GANESH PAPER TRADING CO. .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER (Oral)Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.CM APPL. 19862/2026 (for exemption)2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.CM(M) 663/2026 & CM APPL. 19861/2026 (for stay)3. The present petition has been filed under Article 227 of theConstitution of India, assailing the impugned order dated 12th September, 2025 passed by the learned Trial Court in C.S. (COMM.) No. 489/2021, whereby the evidence of the petitioner/defendant has been closed.4. Heard. Record perused.5. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has argued that the learned TrialCourt has passed the impugned order on the...
Mukesh Kumar Pandey vs Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4134/2026, CM APPL. 20155-20157/2026 MUKESH KUMAR PANDEY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Pratap Singh, Mr. Ajay Singh, Mr. Himanshu Shukla, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Arti Bansal, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Shruti Goel, Advocate along with Ms. Shambhavi Sharma, GP. Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Mr. Manish Kumar Singh, Mr. Vasu Agarwal, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 30.03.20261. This writ petition seeks the following reliefs:a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing and setting aside the arbitrary and illegal action of the Respondents whereby the Petitioner has been treated as a Non-EWS candidate and denied allocation of service in the Civil Services Examination, 2024, despite his valid EWS certificate and inclusion in the Reserve List dated 28.10.2025.b) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction direct...
Devyani International Limited vs Airports Authority of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 285/2026 & I.A. 8563/2026 DEVYANI INTERNATIONAL LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jai Allagh, Mr. Abhinav Agarwal, Mr. Pulkit Dahiya & Mr. Aman Sharma, Advs. (through VC)versusAIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Udit Gupta Mr. Vyom Chaturvedi & Ms. Pragya Gupta, Advs. (throughVC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 30.03.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended by three months as prayed for.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JMARCH 30, 2026haThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re...
Venus Education Trust& Ors. vs State Through Joint Commissioner of Pol ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2352/2026 VENUS EDUCATION TRUST& ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. V. K. Pandey with Mr. Abhigyan, Mr. Murari Tiwari, Mr. Chaitanya Sharma and Mr. Akash Pandey, Advocates.versusSTATE THROUGH JOINT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE TECH,CYBER AND LICENSING & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State with SI Shankar, P.S.: Dwarka South. Mr. Jogender Kumar, Advocate forR-4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 30.03.2026CRL.M.A. 9544/2026Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of.CRL.M.C. 2352/2026By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (BNSS), the petitioners inter-alia seek quashing of an acknowledgment registered on the Cyber Portal of the Delhi Police.2. Mr. V. K. Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the petitionerssubmits, that the money that is subject matter of the complaint made...
Galaxie Agritech Pvt Ltd vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4081/2026 & CM APPL. 20004/2026GALAXIE AGRITECH PVT LTD.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sidharth Chopra, Mr. Aditya Awasthi, Mr. Anish Dewan, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS......Respondent Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Rout, SC for R-2/ SIDBIMr. Sumit Sharma, Adv. for R-3CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 30.03.2026CM APPL. 20003/2026Exemption granted, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.W.P.(C) 4081/20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers: 1) Issue a Writ in the nature of mandamus, or any other No.3 to enforce the guidelines issued by the RBI vide notification/circular dated 17.03.2016 bearing number RBI/2015- "Framework for Revival and Rehabilitation of MSMEs". and/or by placing the Petitioner before the Corrective Action Plan Committee.2) Issue a Writ in the nat...
Dr Vikas Shivajirao Mahalkar vs Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limite ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4140/2026 & CM APPLs. 20232-20233/2026 DR VIKAS SHIVAJIRAO MAHALKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Khandelwal, Mr. Chirag Sharma, Mr. Nikhil Saurabh and Ms. Phallya Jain, Advocates.versusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS......Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Puri, Mr. Sahil Grewal and Ms. Surbhi Gupta, Advocates forR-1.Mr. T. Singhdev, Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty, Mr. Tanishq Srivastav, Ms. Yamini Singh, Mr. Vedant Sood and Ms. Ramanpreet Kaur, Advocates for R-3. Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, SC forNBEMS.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 30.03.20261. At the request of counsel for the Petitioner, National Board ofExamination Medical Science is impleaded as Respondent No. 5. Amended memo of parties be filed within a period of one week from today.2. The Petitioner is a medical officer employed with Respondent No. 1since 23rd November, 2015. It is asserted that he has rendered continuo...
Sardar Gurvinder Singh vs Sanjeev Khirwar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 517/2026 SARDAR GURVINDER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ayush Gupta, Adv.versusSANJEEV KHIRWAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ashutosh Gupta, Adv., MCD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 30.03.2026CM APPL.19799/2026 (Exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of.CONT.CAS(C) 517/20263. The present petition alleges wilful disobedience of the directionscontained in the order dated 23.12.2025 passed in W.P(C) 19564/2025. The operative directions therein are as under: 11. Accordingly, it is directed as follows:i. The petitioner shall appear before the Executive Engineer, BuildingII, Keshav Puram Zone, MCD on 07th January, 2026 at 11:00 AM.ii. The petitioner shall be granted hearing with respect to the amounts already deposited by the petitioner towardsiii. The MCD shall also consider the undertaking and the representation of the petitioner with regard to ...
Navneet Kaur & Ors. vs M/S Ritesh Arora (Partnership Firm) & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 669/2026, CM APPL. 19882/2026, CM APPL. 19883/2026&CM APPL. 19884/2026NAVNEET KAUR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Harshit Agarwal and Mr. Aashush Gupta, Advocates.versusM/S RITESH ARORA (PARTNERSHIP FIRM) & ORS......Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 30.03.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. During the course of arguments, learned Counsel for the petitionersseeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the trial court with an application for early hearing and prays that the present petition be disposed of as withdrawn.3. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned Counsel for thepetitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as sought, in accordance with law. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, JMARCH 30, 2026/v/tpT...
Nazar Mohd vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Mar-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2375/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9650/2026 NAZAR MOHD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harinder Chauhan, AdvocateversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with Inspector Rakesh Kumar, PS Neb SaraiCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 30.03.20261. Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.291/2018 of PS Neb Sarai foroffence under Section 506 IPC and Section 3 Domestic Violence Act on the ground that respondent no. 2 has settled all disputes with the petitioner.2. Since the marriage between the parties is yet to be dissolved inaccordance with law, learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh at appropriate stage.3. As requested, the petition and the accompanying application aredismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought.GIRISH KATHPALIA, JMARCH 30, 2026/asThis is a digitally s...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »