Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anu Mittal vs Mr Kaustubh Goswami
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 2735/2024 & CM APPL. 33804/2024 ANU MITTAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Sharma, Adv. (through VC)versusMR KAUSTUBH GOSWAMI .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 27.02.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the main suit hasalready been dismissed in default and, therefore, he is not pressing the present petition. Accordingly, it is prayed that the present petition may be disposed of as withdrawn.3. Keeping in view of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/sds/abkThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloa...
Classic Industries and Ors vs M/S J.B. Texmach and Spares Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 407/2022, CM APPL. 38635/2022 CLASSIC INDUSTRIES AND ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Namit Suri & Ms. Surabhi Sinha, Advocates.versusM/S J.B. TEXMACH AND SPARES PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mrs. Jasbir Kaur and Mr. Manmeet Arora, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 27.02.20261. Learned counsel for the Appellants seeks permission to withdraw present Appeal in terms of Settlement dated 13.02.2026 arrived at Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.2. In view of submissions made, present Appeal along with pending Applications is dismissed as withdrawn.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.FEBRUARY 27, 2026/R This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 11:26:17...
Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Limited vs Daksh Pharmaceuticals Priva ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 570/2025 GLAXOSMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Vardaan Anand, Advocate.versusDAKSH PHARMACEUTICALS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Aman Gupta, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 27.02.2026 I.A. 5568/2026 (Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC)1. This is a joint compromise application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 filed on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendants.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties submit that the interse disputes have been amicably resolved out of Court and the terms of settlement have been reduced into writing in the para 2 of the present application. The same has been reproduced hereunder for the sake of convenience: 2. That during the pendency of the proceedings, the Plaintiff and the Defendants initiated talks for amicably resolving the disputes between the parti...
Manhar Sabharwal vs Rakesh Sabharwal & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO 306/2023 and CM APPL. 60955/2023 MANHAR SABHARWAL .....Appellant Through: Mr.Kharanshu Rana, AdvocateversusRAKESH SABHARWAL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr Sourabh Gupta, Mr Puneet Yadav and Mr Vasu Dev, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 27.02.20261. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal, as the parties have arrived at a settlement.2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, along with all pending application(s). DASTI. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026 naThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 11:12:01...
Randhir Kumar Singh vs Manjeet Solanki
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of Decision: 27th February, 2026 + CM(M) 1138/2025 & CM APPL. 68427/2025 RANDHIR KUMAR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Seth, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Ms. Neelampreet, Mr. Abhiroop Rathore and Mr. Sukhvir Singh, Advocates along with Petitioner in person.versusMANJEET SOLANKI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mohit Kumar Sharma, Advocate along with Respondent in person. Mr. Sharique Hussain and Ms. Kirti Garg, Advocate for R-BSES (Through VC).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER (Oral)Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, J.1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227of the Constitution of India, 1950 assailing the order dated 26thApril, 2025, passed by the learned Trial Court in CS SCJ No. 1843/2024, whereby the application of the petitioner/ plaintiff for restoration of the electricity has been dismissed.3. I have heard the learned counsel fo...
Ram Dulare Yadav@ Gandhi Bhai vs Kapil Goel
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 3122/2024 & CM APPL. 44998/2024 RAM DULARE YADAV@ GANDHI BHAI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anjuman Tripathy, AoR with Mr. Mohit Singh Sikarwar, Advs. (through VC)versusKAPIL GOEL .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 27.02.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition has become infructuous, as the disputes between the parties have been settled. Accordingly, it is prayed that the petition may be disposed of as withdrawn.3. Keeping in view of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/sds/abkThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code...
Samsuddin vs Usman Ali
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 101/2024 SAMSUDDIN .....Appellant Through: Appearance not given..versusUSMAN ALI .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 19.03.2026 CM APPL. 17144/2026 (CM For Restoration)1. Application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of the Appellant seeking restoration of the Appeal, which got dismissed in default vide Order dated 27.02.2026.2. On filing PF, Notice be issued to the Respondent by all permissible modes, returnable for 03.08.2026.3. List on 03.08.2026.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.MARCH 19, 2026/R This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/03/2026 at 11:03:16...
Ankit Sharma vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Another
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11122/2025 & CM APPL. 45746/2025 ANKIT SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Advocate through VC (appearance not given).versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Kumar Khanna, Advocate for R-1. Ms. Mamta Garg and Ms. Mukta Garg and Mr. Vishal, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 27.02.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to therespondent no.1 with respect to the unauthorised construction being carried out in the property bearing no. X/3126, Gali No. 4, Raghubarpura No. 2, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi-110031, measuring 100 sq. yds.2. Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the respondent no.2,who is the owner of the property in question, has started raising unauthorised commercial construction, without obtaining any sanctioned building plan approved from the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD).3. It is submitted that the house...
Neha Dhanda vs Directorate of Education & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 15821/2023 & CM APPL. 63620-63621/2023 NEHA DHANDA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dushyant Kumar, Advocate.versusDIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurav Dhingra and Mr. Shashank Singh, Advocates for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 27.02.20261. Mr. Dushyant Kumar, counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions states that he would like to withdraw the petition.2. Dismissed as withdrawn along with pending applications. SANJEEV NARULA, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/hcThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2026 at 12:58:55...
Shanu@ Shan Mohammad & Ors. vs State Govt of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 6587/2024 SHANU@ SHAN MOHAMMAD & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Petitioners with their counsel Mr. Haider Ali, Mr. Anand Paul, Mr. Saurabh Arora, Mr. Manjeet Kumar, Mr. Devendra Sharma, Ms. Vanita, Ms. Nazreen, Ms. Nigar, Mr. Rizwan, Mr. Asif Ahmad, Mr Mohd Amit and Mr. Shaihzad, Advs.versusSTATE GOVT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Manoj Pant, APP for the State along with ASI Pramod Kumar. R-2 with his counselCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.02.20261. By way of present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIRbearing no. 415/2024, registered at Police Station Dayal Pur, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 110/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereafter 'BNS).2. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer(IO) from Police Station Daya...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »