Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr Arathy Gopal vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 101/2026 & CM APPLs. 13701-02/2026 DR ARATHY GOPAL .....Appellant Through: Dr.Amit George, Adv. with Mr.Saurabh Bhargavan and Mr.Nikhil S. Nair, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Nemo.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 27.02.20261. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.2. On being pointed out that since intra-court appeal has been filedagainst an interlocutory order, which effectively does not decide any issue and therefore, the very maintainability of the appeal is at stake, learned counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the appeal with the liberty to file an appropriate application before learned Single Judge in the pending writ petition.3. The appeal is, thus, dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayedfor.4. We may, however, observe that if any fresh application is filedseeking interim relief, the same shall...
Parag Jain vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1627/2026 PARAG JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Isha khanna, Ms. Ruchika Malik and Ms. Stuti Gupta, Advocates alongwith petitioner in personVersusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the State with SI Shweta, PS: Krishna Nagar, Delhi R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.02.2026CRL.M.A. 6626/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed ofCRL.M.C. 1627/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6698/20263. By way of the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIRbearing no. 65/2021, dated 18.03.2021, registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, New Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC).4. The petitioner and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court andhave been identified by their counsels and concerned Inve...
Sheela Devi and Ors vs Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1629/2026 SHEELA DEVI AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vivekanand Ray, Advocate alongwith petitioners in personversusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....RespondentsThrough: Mr.Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State with SI Deepak, PS Bindapuri R-2 to 4 present in personCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.02.20261. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of theFIR bearing No. 1115/2015, registered at Police Station Bindapur, Delhi, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 342/354B/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC').2. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.3. All the petitioners are present before this Court and have beenidentified by their counsel and Investigating Officer (IO) concerned, Police Station, Bindapur, Delhi.4. Brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the pet...
Hindustan Construction Company Limited vs Nhpc Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 206/2026 & I.A. 5538/2026HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYLIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anmol Kumar, Mr. Manmeet Singh Nagpal & Ms. Chestha Dalal, Advs.versusNHPC LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pratyush Shrivastava, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 27.02.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended till 31.12.2026 as prayed for.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JFEBRUARY 27, 2026ChThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown ...
Pay 10 Services Private Limited vs Union of India Ad Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 710/2026 & CM APPL. 7763/2026 PAY 10 SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Nakul Batra, Ms. Palak and Mr. Sreedhar, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Proxy counsel for UOI (appearance not given) Mr. Kunal Makhija, Advocate for R3 Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vinod Kanna, Ms. Shefali Munde and Mr. Arjun Bhatia, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 27.02.20261. Matter taken up on mentioning at the end of the board.2. Learned senior counsel for petitioner, on instructions, seekspermission to withdraw this writ petition so that petitioner may seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law.3. As requested, the petition and the accompanying application aredismissed as withdrawn.GIRISH KATHPALIA, JFEBRUARY 27, 2026/asThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order ca...
Mohd Talib Ali & Anr. vs State Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 711/2026 MOHD TALIB ALI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Waseem Arkan and Mr. Himanshu Kaushik, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC with SI Akash.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 27.02.20261. Issue notice. Mr. Rahul Tyagi, learned Additional StandingCounsel, accepts notice on behalf of the State.2. The petitioners have filed this petition under Article 226 of theConstitution, seeking protection in view of an apprehended threat from the family of petitioner No. 2.3. The petitioners claim to have married each other according tocustomary practices on 18.12.2025, and have produced a certificate of registration of marriage issued by the Office of the District Magistrate, Kalkaji, South-East District, on 19.02.2026.4. The parties have also handed up to the Court the Secondary SchoolExamination Certificates of both petitioners, w...
Shri Ashok Kumar Rana vs Delhi Public School, Vasant Kunj & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2762/2026 SHRI ASHOK KUMAR RANA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ahanthem Henry and Mr. Aniket Rajput, Advocates.versusDELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL, VASANT KUNJ & ORS......Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Sakshi Mendiratta, Advocate for R-1 and R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 27.02.20261. The Petitioner was working as a Caretaker with Respondent No. 1(Delhi Public School, Vasant Kunj) since 1st July, 1984. In May 2005, the Principal of the School received a complaint alleging that the Petitioner had accepted a sum of INR 1.5 lakhs from an individual on the representation that he would arrange admission of a student in Class II. An internal enquiry was initiated, and the matter was also reported to the police. This culminated in registration of FIR No. 345/2005 at P.S. Vasant Kunj (North) under Sections 420/120B IPC.2. Simultaneously, the School issued a memorandum dated ...
Ridley Life Science Pvt Ltd vs Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited & ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2753/2026, CM APPL. 13368/2026, CM APPL. 13369/2026& CM APPL. 13370/2026RIDLEY LIFE SCIENCE PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anshuman Sharma, Mr. Kartikey Kumar, Mr. Azaz Ahmed and Mr. Sidhant Thakur, Advocates.versusTATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LIMITED& ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Srivastava, Mr. Moksh Arora, Mr. Santosh Ramdurg and Ms. Charu Roy, Advocates for R-1 with Mr. Amit Singh, AGM Legal. Mr. Anirudh Dusaj, Advocate forR-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 27.02.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:-W.P.(C) 2753/2026 Page 1 of 32. Mr. Anshuman Sharma, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitionercompany, submits that the final assessment order is based on an inspection, which never took place. He further submits that the final assessment order, even though dated 15th April, 2025, was not supplied to the petitioner at ...
Mohd Iqbal Siddiqui and Ors vs the State Govt. of Nct, Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 702/2026 MOHD IQBAL SIDDIQUI AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Petitioners with their counsel Mr. Abid Ibrahim and Mr. Rahul Kumar, Adv.sversusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT, DELHI AND ANR ...Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for the State with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Ms. Chavi Lazarus and Mr. Anshul Sharma, Advs. along with ASI Ominder Singh. R-2 with her counsel Mr. Tarun Narayan Tyagi and Mr. Rahul Dev, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 27.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 6609/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of.W.P.(CRL) 702/20263. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioners seek quashing ofFIR bearing no. 171/2025, registered at Police Station South East, Jamia Nagar, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections(hereafter BNS).4. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before th...
Vinod Kumar vs State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL)700/2026 VINOD KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner-in-person with Mr. Anurag Jain, Adv.versusSTATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel along with Ms.Priyam Agarwal, Mr.Abhinav Kr.Arya and Mr.Aryan Sachdeva, Advs with Insp. Rakesh Kumar SHO Vasant Vihar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAVORDER% 27.02.20261. Hybrid Mode.2. Matter received on transfer.CRL.M.A.6603/2026 (exemption).3. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.4. Applications stands disposed of.W.P.(CRL) 700/20265. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indiaread with Section 482 of the CrPC seeks the following prayers: (a). Issue a writ/order/direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the respondent to grant parole to the petitioner Vinod Kumar for a period of 4 weeks w.e.f 27.02.2026 in FIR No.235/2001 U/s 302/201/120B/34 IPG PS Vasant Vih...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »