Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kapil Yadav & Ors. vs Uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8049/2008 KAPIL YADAV & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Prerna Mehta & Mr. Ajay Verma, Advs.versusUOI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC with Mr. Anant Mann, JSC, Mr. Pratyaksh Gupta, JSC & Ms. Lopamudra Mahapatra, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 03.02.20261. The present writ petition has been preferred for the following reliefs:a) issue a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing order of attachment dated 18th December, 2007 in regard to property and premises bearing No.205, Udyog Vihar, Phase IV, Gurgaon (Haryana); b)Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the attachmentorder dated 4th March, 2004 passed by Income Tax Departmentin regard to property and premises bearing No.205, Udyog Vihar, Phase IV, Gurgaon (Haryana); c) Issue a writ in the nature of prohibition restraining respondents No.1-4 from putting the prope...
Union of India,Ministry of Communication & Information Technoly vs M/S ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 476/2017 UNION OF INDIA,MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATION & INFORMATION TECHNOLY .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh, AdvocateversusM/S MICROTEK INSTRUMENTS & ANR .....Defendants Through: Mr. S. Santanam Swaminadhan, Mr. Kartik Malhotra, & Ms. Shivani Chaudhary, Advocates for D-1CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADORDER% 03.02.20261. The prayer in the present Suit is for recovery of a sum of Rs.1,10,61,194/- towards the refund of the purchase price of the equipment along-with applicable interest.2. The amount stipulated in the present recovery Suit is less than the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Court.3. In view of the foregoing, the present Suit stands disposed of, having been transferred to the Court of competent jurisdiction.4. The Registry is directed to transmit the entire record of the Suit, along with all documents, to the learned District Judge, Patiala House Courts, or to any other Court of co...
Mohd Saeed vs State Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 170/2026 MOHD SAEED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Priyal Bhardwaj, Advocate.versusSTATE GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for the State. SI Sandeep Kumar, P.S.: Special Cell. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI ORDER % 02.02.2026 Order dated 16.01.2026 records, that the State has failed to decide the petitioners parole application despite earlier order dated 23.12.2025 passed in W.P.(Crl.) 569/2025 by a Co-ordinate Bench of this court. 2. Though no status report has been filed, learned counsel appearing for the State has handed-up status report dated 29.01.2026, wherein they have opposed the grant of parole. 3. Learned counsel has also handed-up order dated 09.01.2026, whereby the petitioners pending application seeking parole has been rejected. 4. The status report dated 29.01.2026 and order dated 09.01.2026 are taken on record. 5. Let copy of reject...
Subedar Major Mahmood Khan & Ors vs Union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 938/2019SUBEDAR MAJOR MAHMOOD KHAN & ORS .....PetitionersThrough: Mr. Rajeev Mangalik, Mr. Rajesh Inamdar, Ms. Sheena Taqui, Mr. Revant Solanki, Ms. Akansha Saini, Mr. Arpit Linda, Ms. Sheeriz Naaz Fazal, Advs.VersusUNION OF INDIA & ORS .....RespondentsThrough: Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, CGSC, UOI with Mr. Muhammad Aamir Khan and Mr. Abdur Rahman, Advs. Mr. Shoumendu Mukherji, Ms. Megha Sharma, Mr. Aniruddha Ghosh and Ms. Surabhi Tuli, Advs. for CISCICORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER % 02.02.2026 1. The subject matter of the writ petition shall lie before the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT). 2. Accordingly, this petition is transferred to the AFT. The record of the petition be transmitted to AFT forthwith. On the receipt of the record, the Registrar of AFT shall list the matter before the appropriate Bench afterThis is a digitally signed orde...
Mwo Prakash Chandra Lenka vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 502/2026 CM APPL. 2407/2026 MWO PRAKASH CHANDRA LENKA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Kumar, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nirvikar Verma, SPC and Sgt. C. P. Chandan. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA ORDER % 02.02.20261. We have been informed by the counsel for the respondents that the petitioner has been posted at Barrackpur, West Bengal and the petitioner has joined the place of posting. 2. Though the counsel for the petitioner would urge that appropriate would have been that the petitioner is posted at Bhubaneswar, but we have been informed that there is no post commensurating his qualification available at Bhubaneswar, as it is only a selection centre. 3. In view of the fact that the petitioner is posted near to his home State, we dispose of this petition along with pending application.V. KAMESWAR RAO, J...
Pradeepa Shivashankar vs Vishal Pal Singh Commissioner of Customs
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 77/2026 PRADEEPA SHIVASHANKAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Swaswank Rai, Mr. Saikat Gangopadhyay, Mr.Himalya Sharma and Ms. Shreya Shankar, Advs. versusVISHAL PAL SINGH COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aditya Singhla, SSC, Ms. Arya Suresh Nair, Adv., CBIC (through v/c) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. Mr. Aditya Singla, learned counsel for the respondent informs that in terms of order dated 30.01.2026 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in modification application bearing no. 6266/2026 filed by the respondent in W.P(C) 11902/2025, the time period for compliance has been extended till 10.02.2026. 2. It is submitted that the petitioner has been asked to appear before the Custom Department on 10.02.2026 for release of the concerned items. The said statement is taken on record. 3. In view thereof, no further orders are required to be passed. 4. T...
Munish Dabas vs Central Board of Direct Taxes & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 75/2026 MUNISH DABAS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Parth Sahrawat, Advocate. versusCENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Sr. Standing Counsel along with Mr. Akshat Singh, Jr. Standing Counsel, Ms. Sakshi Sheriwal, Jr. Standing Counsel, Mr. Gooraang Ranjan and Ms. Harshita Kotru, Advocates for Revenue. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA ORDER % 02.02.20261. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the directions contained in the order dated 18.03.2025 passed in W.P.(C) 1333/2025, read with the order dated 22.04.2025 passed in CM APPL.23019/2025 (seeking modification of the aforesaid order dated 18.03.2025), have been complied with, inasmuch as the respondents have issued the process for determining the reward payable to the petitioner, and on culmination of the said process, have issued a sanction order dated 30...
Al Saad Traders Through Its Proprietor Anash vs Commisisoner of Centra ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 341/2026 & CM APPL. 1667/2026 & CM APPL. 1666/2026 AL SAAD TRADERS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR ANASH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M. A. Ansari, Ms. Tabbasum Firdause, Mr. Mohd. Imran and Mr. Ahmad Ansari, Advs.versusCOMMISISONER OF CENTRAL TAX & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Samiksha Godiyal, SSC, CBIC with Mr. Tenzing Namgyal Bhutia and Mr. Rithwik Narayanan, Advs.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER % 02.02.20261. We see no reason to entertain the present petition particularly when the petitioner has alternate and efficacious remedy. Just because, the petitioner is claiming that financially, he is not in a position to make the statutory pre-deposit of 10 % of the liability at the time of filing of appeal, that by itself will not render the appellate remedy infructuous nor may lead to maintainability of this petition. 2. That being so, th...
Alka Bharti vs Karan Sagar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~5&6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (5) MAT.APP.(F.C.) 304/2023 KARAN SAGAR .....Appellant Through: Mr. Varun Mittal, Ms. Bhavya Mishra, Advs. versus ALKA BHARTI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sumit Kumar Yadav, Adv. (6)+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 14/2024 ALKA BHARTI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sumit Kumar Yadav, Adv. versus KARAN SAGAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Mittal, Ms. Bhavya Mishra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. Learned counsel for the parties inform that the matter has been settled between the parties and have already moved the first motion before the Family Court. Hence, they pray to withdraw the present appeals. 2. In view of the above, the present appeals along with pending applications, if any, stand disposed of as withdrawn. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, JRENU BHATNAGAR, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/bs/smThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can b...
Jaideep Kanojia vs State Nct of Delhi Through Sho Ps Kalindi Kunj
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-02-2026
$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 412/2026&CRL.M.A. 3123/2026 JAIDEEP KANOJIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rishabh Yadav, Advocate.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO PS KALINDI KUNJ .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP with SI Satyapreet.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 02.02.2026 1. Since the FIR in question has been quashed in CRL.M.C. 878/2026, learned counsel of the petitioner does not pray for any further relief. 2. In view of the fact that the FIR has been quashed, present application has become infructuous. 3. The application is disposed of as having become infructuous.MANOJ JAIN, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/sw/pbThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/02/2026 at 12:20:32...
- ‹ Prev
- 235
- 236
- 237
- 238
- 239
- 241
- 242
- 243
- 244
- 245
- Next ›
- Last »