Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arman vs the State N.C.T of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4835/2025 ARMAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Mr. Chetan Pangasa, Ms. Kanika Vohra, Advs.VersusTHE STATE N.C.T OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 03.02.20261. By way of the present application, the applicant seeks grant ofanticipatory bail in case arising out of FIR bearing no. 550/2025, registered at Police Station Model Town, Delhi, for the commission of the offence punishable under Sections 74/115(2)/126(2)/351(3)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter BNS).2. The brief facts of the present case are that on the intervening night of31.10.2025 / 01.11.2025, at about 01:00 AM, the complainant was standing on the street in front of her house along with her husband, as they were about to leave for Prahladpur, Delhi. While the complainants husband had gone to bring the car from the parking area, the co-accused per...
Jitender Singh Lamba vs the State of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 891/2026, CRL.M.A. 3547-3549/2026 JITENDER SINGH LAMBA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate with petitioner in person.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 03.02.20261. After some arguments, Mr. Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this petition, with liberty to the petitioner to take such remedies as may be available in law.2. The petition, alongwith pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.3. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on the merits of the case. PRATEEK JALAN, J FEBRUARY 3, 2026 SS/KA/This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/02/2026 at 12:04:25...
Dhan Prakash Gupta vs Vinod Malik
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P.(NI) 26/2026, CRL.M.A. 3607/2026-Stay, CRL.M.A. 3608/2026-Exp DHAN PRAKASH GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pradhuman, AdvocateversusVINOD MALIK .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 03.02.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner after canvasing his case, seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the learned Trial Court for raising the same contentions vehemently argued before this Court.2. As such, the present petition alongwith the pending applications is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. SAURABH BANERJEE, J FEBRUARY 3, 2026/SoThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/02/2026 at 12:06:57...
Sachin & Anr. vs Canara Bank
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA(COMM) 560/2025, CM APPL. 61873/2025, CM APPL. SACHIN & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Yash Harshvardhan and Mr. Ketan Bhutani, Advocates.versusCANARA BANK .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naman Shukla, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAORDER (ORAL)% 03.02.2026C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The dispute between the parties stands settled with the intervention of the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.2. The settlement agreement dated 7 November 2025 arrived at between the parties is on record.3. We have perused the settlement agreement and we find that it is lawful and capable of enforcement.4. The parties would abide by the terms of settlement. Accordingly, nothing survives for adjudication in the appeal. Signed By:RAJEEV RFA(COMM) 560/2025 Page 1 of 25. The appeal stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. C. HARI SHANKAR, J OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J FEBRUARY 3, 2026/...
Neeraj @ Kuppa vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 5/2026 NEERAJ @ KUPPA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vrinda Bhandari and Ms. Pragya Barsaiyan, Advocates (DHCLSC)versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhijeet Kumar and Ms. Amisha Gupta, Advocates for Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for State with SI Vivek, PS: Neb SaraiCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 03.02.20261. The petitioner, vide the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeks issuance of a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondent to grant custody parole for a period of six hours enabling him to visit his ailing father who is admitted in Nehru Homeopathic Medical College & Hospital.2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions, seeks to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to approach the Court in accordance with law as and when requi...
Naresh Akkepally vs State of Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 5059/2025 NARESH AKKEPALLY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Y. Lokesh, Mr. Bibek Tripathi and Mr. Ajay, Advocates.versusSTATE OF GNCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP with SI Raj Kumar Singh.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 03.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 3660/2026(for withdrawal) &BAIL APPLN. 5059/20251. The applicant has filed CRL.M.A. 3660/2026 seeking permissionto withdraw the captioned bail application, stating that he wishes to reserve his rights to approach the appropriate Court for relief, at the appropriate stage.2. Having regard to the aforesaid, the application is allowed, and the bail application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.3. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on themaintainability or merits of any application that may be filed by the applicant, which may be considered independently on its own merits and in accordance with law.4. The next date of ...
Aashutosh Kumar vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1474/2026 AASHUTOSH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Kumar Singh, Advocate.versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain ASC with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Ms. Vishruti Pandey and Mr. Sachin Garg, Advocates for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 03.02.20261. After making submissions for some time, Mr. Abhishek Kumar Singh,counsel for the Petitioner, seeks leave of this Court to avail appropriate legal remedies against his employer, i.e., Respondent No. 2, by instituting civil proceedings in accordance with law.2. Leave and liberty, as prayed for, are granted.3. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case, including on the maintainability of any such action against Respondent No. 2, if and when filed.4. With the above directions, the present petition is disposed of, along with pending application(s), if any. SANJEEV NARULA, J FE...
Babar & Ors. vs the State of Delhi Sho New Usmanpur & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 892/2026 BABAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Zeba, Advocate alongwith petitioners in personversusTHE STATE OF DELHI SHO NEW USMANPUR & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 03.02.20261. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIRbearing no. 703/2024, registered at Police Station New Usmanpur, Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 115(2)351(3)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereafter BNS) and Section 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019.2. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer(IO) from Police Station New Usmanpur, Delhi.3. Brief facts of the present case are that the marriage between thepetitioner no.1 and respond...
Sherpal Singh vs D.T.C.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
$~R-2&3* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI(2)+ FAO(OS) 419/2009 SHERPAL SINGH .....Appellant Through: NoneversusD.T.C. .....Respondent Through: None (3)+ FAO(OS) 556/2009 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION .....Appellant Through: NoneversusSHER PAL SINGH .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 03.02.20261. The matter was called out twice in the revised call; however, none appeared on behalf of either of the parties.2. Accordingly, the present appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution.3. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J RENU BHATNAGAR, J FEBRUARY 3, 2026/bs/myThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 12:52:04...
Delhi Transport Corporation vs Sher Pal Singh
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-03-2026
$~R-2&3* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI(2) FAO(OS) 419/2009 SHERPAL SINGH .....Appellant Through: NoneversusD.T.C. .....Respondent Through: None (3)+ FAO(OS) 556/2009 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION .....Appellant Through: NoneversusSHER PAL SINGH .....Respondent Through: NoneCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARYHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGARORDER% 03.02.20261. The matter was called out twice in the revised call; however, none appeared on behalf of either of the parties.2. Accordingly, the present appeals are dismissed for want of prosecution.3. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J RENU BHATNAGAR, J FEBRUARY 3, 2026/bs/myThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2026 at 12:52:11...
- ‹ Prev
- 234
- 235
- 236
- 237
- 238
- 240
- 241
- 242
- 243
- 244
- Next ›
- Last »