Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajiv Kumar Singhal vs State Gnct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 687/2026RAJIV KUMAR SINGHAL .....PetitionerThrough: Ms. Priyal Bhardwaj, Advocate.versusSTATE GNCT OF DELHI .....RespondentThrough: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC with Mr. Arjit Sharma and Ms. Sakshi Jha, Advocates. SI Vikas, PS-Kalyan Puri.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 26.02.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks a direction towards Competent Authority to consider name of the petitioner for pre-mature release in case FIR No.341/1996 registered under Sections 304B/498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at PS.: Kalyan Puri, Delhi in the upcoming Sentence Review Board Meeting.2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks towithdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the incumbent jail authorities, if, as and when required.3...
Sahil Gupta vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1585/2026 SAHIL GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Malik & Mr. Aman Malik, Advocates alongwith Petitioner in Person.versusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for State. SI Shivpal Singh & HC Vikram, PS Punjabi Bagh. Mr Pramod Kumar, Advocate for R-2 alongwith R-2 in Person.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 26.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 6402/2026 (for exemption)1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of.CRL.M.C. 1585/20261. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure [CrPC]), seeking quashing of FIR No. under Sections 279/337 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], alongwith consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.CRL.M.C. 1585/2026 Page 1 of 62. Issue ...
Ranjeet Jha @ Ganja vs State Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 826/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6343/2026RANJEET JHA @ GANJA.....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sanjana Gupta, Advocate (through V.C.).versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 26.02.20261. Applicant seeks regular bail in a case arising out of FIR No.1092/2022dated 11.12.2022, for commission of offences under Sections 324/307/506/34 IPC, registered at P.S.Mukherjee Nagar.2. Charges have already been framed.3. As per the prosecution story, on 11.12.2022, two accused (includingthe applicant herein) with one Chunni (since absconding) and one Amit (since deceased) caused serious stab injuries to Ashwani @ Goli and Raja Sisodiya, and also caused simple injuries to two other persons.4. When the applicant prayed for regular bail earlier, such relief wasdenied by the learned Trial Court while also observing that the appl...
Mohd. Tayyab vs Farheen
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 121/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6446-6447/2026MOHD. TAYYAB .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Parmeet Singh, Advocate.versusFARHEEN .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 26.02.20261. By way of this petition, the petitioner assails an order dated12.01.2026, by which the Family Court has summoned income tax records of the petitioner in proceedings under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.2. Mr. Parmeet Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, contends thatthe said evidence has been summoned at a belated stage, when the matter was scheduled for final arguments. He submits that the grievance of the petitioner is that, if the evidence is to be re-opened, he should also be permitted to place on record a fresh affidavit of assets and liabilities, as the petitioners liabilities have increased since the last affidavit filed by him.3. After some arguments, Mr. Singh submit...
Union of India & Ors. vs Janardhan Singh Rawat
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2700/2026 CM APPL. 13066/2026 CM APPL. 13271/2026 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, CGSC, Ms Vandana Sachdeva, Mr Ankit Choudhary, Mr Sumit Choudhary and Major Kanika SharmaversusJANARDHAN SINGH RAWAT .....Respondent Through: appearance not given.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 26.02.20261. This petition lays a challenge to the order dated 17.09.2018 whichwas passed almost eight years back. Learned counsel for the petitioners have no explanation for the delay and laches.2. If that be so, this petition is dismissed on the ground of delay andlatches alone. The pending applications are also dismissed.V. KAMESWAR RAO, JMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, JFEBRUARY 26, 2026rkThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. T...
Master Lalith Kumar Through His Father Devaraju N. vs Sh. Ashok Kumar ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
$~225 & 226* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 335/2026MASTER HARSHA D.R. THROUGHHIS FATHER SH. SHANKARAPPA D.R. .....Petitioner + CONT.CAS(C) 336/2026(226) MASTER LALITH KUMARTHROUGH HIS FATHER DEVARAJU N. .....PetitionerCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 26.02.20261. The petitioners are minor children suffering from rare geneticdisorders. These petitions allege that the Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) is obligated to provide continuous treatment to the petitioners in view of their condition. It is pointed out that the said obligation clearly flows from the judgments/ orders dated 17.07.2019 inW.P.(C) 8503/2017 and 15.04.2019 in W.P.(C) 1860/2016.2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the fact that, of late, the ESIC hasbeen remiss in providing the requisite treatment and administering the concerned drugs to the petitioners.3. Learned counsel appearing for ESIC fairly submits that ESIC shallcontinue to provide the...
Sitara Singh vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 686/2026 SITARA SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitender Tyagi, Mr. Gaurav Bidhuri, Ms. Tabassum, Advs. along with petitioner in person.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl) with Ms. Priyam Agarwal, Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. for the State and SI Kamal Sharma, PS Maidangiri.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 26.02.20261. The present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 ofthe Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying for issuance of a Writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce Ms.XXX before this Court.2. Issue notice.3. Notice is accepted by Mr.Sanjay Lao, the learned StandingCounsel for the respondent nos.1 to 3.4. The status report filed by the respondent nos.1 to 3 is taken onrecord....
Sumit Dass and Ors vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 683/2026 SUMIT DASS AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. S.S. Raghav, Advocate alongwith petitioners in personversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC for the State with SI Dinesh Kumar, P.S. Kashmere Gate R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 26.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 6364/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6365/2 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Applications stand disposed of.W.P.(CRL) 683/20263. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIRbearing no. 301/2023, registered at Police Station Kashmeri Gate, New Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC) and the proceedings emanating therefrom.4. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court andhave been identified by their counsels and concerned Invest...
Neelam & Anr vs Ram Swaroop & Anr (ICICI Lombard Motor Ins Co Ltd )
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAC.APP. 147/2019 NEELAM & ANR .....Appellant Through: None.versusRAM SWAROOP & ANR (ICICI LOMBARD MOTOR INSCO LTD ) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Jha, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 26.02.20261. No one appears on behalf of appellant.2. From the perusal of the order sheets, it shows that no one hasbeen appearing on behalf of appellant for many dates.3. In view of the same, the appeal is dismissed for want ofprosecution.4. Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.ANISH DAYAL, JFEBRUARY 26, 2026/RKThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 11:15:11...
Zahida Begum vs ICICI Lombard Gen Ins Co Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MAC.APP. 252/2019 ZAHIDA BEGUM .....Appellant Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv.versusICICI LOMBARD GEN INS CO LTD & ORS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Suman Bagga and Ms. Mouli Sharma, Advs. for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALORDER% 26.02.20261. Pursuant to an accident which occurred on 25th October 2013, involvinga motorcycle on which the deceased was alleged to be travelling as a pillion rider and which was allegedly driven by Mohd. Fahim, and insured with respondent no.3, a collision occurred with the offending vehicle/truck, which hit the motorcycle and fled from the spot, resulting in fatal injuries to the deceased Mohd. Nazakat Hussain. An FIR No.259/2013 under Sections Station Garhmukteshwar, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh. A claim petition was filed under Section 163(A) of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988, on the basis that the deceased Mohd. Nazakat Hussain was a pillion rider and, therefore, a third party to the insura...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »