Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vijeta Gautam vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1396/2026 & CRL.M.A. 5618/2026 VIJETA GAUTAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sehgal, Ms. Prathana, Mr. Vivek Kumar Aurora, Ms. Tulika and Ms. S. Choubey AdvocatesversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advocates Inspector Dharmender Kumar, Vigilance, DelhiCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 26.02.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw thepresent petition.2. As such, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.SAURABH BANERJEE, J.FEBRUARY 26, 2026/SoThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2026 at 12:02:45...
Upendra Kumar vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2365/2026 UPENDRA KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Mr. Satyaarth Sinha, Ms. Shradha Mewati & Mr. Ajinkya Dhalwade, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Latika Malhotra, SPC for UOI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAORDER% 26.02.20261. The counsel for the respondents submit that she has instructions tostate that the competent authority has decided to post the petitioner at 36, Battalion, BSF Noida.2. Mr. Bharghav, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the sameshall satisfy the grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition.3. Taking the statement of the counsel for the respondent on record, thepetition is disposed of.V. KAMESWAR RAO, JMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, JFEBRUARY 26, 2026/ngThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi Hig...
Ajay vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 586/2026AJAY.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. Anmol Kumar Pandey, Ms. Jyoti Yadav, Mr. Nitin Yadav, Mr. Vikas Deep and Mr. Krishna Kumar, Advocates.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel(Crl.) with Ms. Priyam Agarwal and Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 26.02.20261. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying for issuance of Writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus, seeking production of Ms. Anjalee Kumari, who is stated to be the wife of the petitioner.2. Pursuant to our order dated 19.02.2026, Ms. Anjalee Kumarihas appeared before us in person. We have interacted with her, with her father, as also the petitioner, in our Chamber.3. In this int...
Abhijeet Kumar Singh vs Foreigner Regional Registration Officer & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 628/2026 ABHIJEET KUMAR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok K. Singh, Mr.Deepak Kumar , Mr.Lalit Choudhary, AdvocatesversusFOREIGNER REGIONAL REGISTRATION OFFICER & ORS......Respondents Through: Mr. Farman Ali, CGSC with Ms.Usha Jamnal, Advocate for R-1FRROMr.Vikrant Pachnanda, SPP for CBI with Mr.Mukul Katyal, Advocate for R-2/CBI Mr.Hitesh Sachar, Advocate for R- 3/BankCORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 26.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 6483/2026 (for early hearing) The petitioner has filed this application seeking early hearing of the captioned petition. For the reasons stated in the application, and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, it is allowed, and the petition is taken on Board. The application stands disposed of.W.P.(CRL) 628/20261. This writ petition has been filed, under Article 226 of theW.P.(CRL) 628/2026 Page 1 of 2 Constitution, for the following reliefs: Pass an order thereby iss...
Rajesh Khurana vs Lieutenant Governor, Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2412/2026 RAJESH KHURANA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Kohli, Senior Advocate with Ms. Yeshi Rinchhen, Mr. Anmol Chawla and Ms. Vasudha Chadha, Advocates.versusLIEUTENANT GOVERNOR, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Lalltaksh Joshi and Ms. Minu Kumari, Advocates for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 26.02.2026 CM APPL. 13159/2026 (to place on record additional documents)1. Through the present application, the Petitioner seeks to place onrecord certain additional documents. The said documents comprise a Sale Deed, which, according to the Petitioner, establishes his ownership over the subject land. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the documents are taken on record.2. The application is accordingly disposed of.W.P.(C) 2412/20263. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the main writ petitionis called on board toda...
Akash @ Bhola vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 657/2026 AKASH @ BHOLA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anmol Kumar Pandey, Ms. Jyoti Yadav, Mr. Vikas Deep and Mr. Nitin Yadav, Advocates.versusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for the State. SI Sandeep Yadav, P.S.: Sadar Bazar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 26.02.2026 By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks release on parole, while challenging conditions Nos. 7 and 9 of order dated 27.01.2026 by which the jail authorities have declined to release the petitioner only because co-convict Manoj is already on parole and is yet to surrender. The petitioner has been granted parole by the jail authorities vidorder dated 27.01.2026 subject however to the aforesaid conditionviz., that ordinarily co-convicts are not be released on parole simulta...
Vishal Sagar & Ors. vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 1582/2026 VISHAL SAGAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Petitioners with their counselversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State. R-2 with her counsel Mr. Gaurav Gulati, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 26.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 6390/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of.CRL.M.C. 1582/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6389/20263. By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIRbearing no. 168/2018, dated 19.03.2018, registered at Police Station Rajouri Garden, New Delhi, for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC).4. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court andhave been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer(IO) from Police Station Ra...
Kishan Singh Alias Badal vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 831/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6378/2026 KISHAN SINGH ALIAS BADAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Chaman Lal and Ms.Taruna Devi, AdvocatesversusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State with SI Sanjeeta P.S. Mukherjee NagarCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 26.02.20261. The learned counsel for the petitioner draws this Courts attention tothe fact that the complainant in this case has not been examined as yet, despite the accused being in judicial custody for last about two years. The learned Trial Court is directed to ensure that the complainant and eye witnesses are examined on the next date of hearing.2. At this stage, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicantstates that she does not want to press the present bail application and seeks permission to withdraw the present bail application.3. Accordingly, the present ba...
Vaderas Interiors and Exteriors vs Gail India Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 199/2026, I.A. 5320/2026 & I.A. 5321/2026 VADERAS INTERIORS AND EXTERIORS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Kumar, Mr. Parv Verma & Mr. Ish Chopra, Advs.versusGAIL INDIA LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. N.L. Ganapathi & Ms. Rini V. Tigga, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 26.02.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended by twelve months as prayed for.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, JFEBRUARY 26, 2026haThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanni...
Mahesh vs the State( Nct of Delhi) and Another
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 829/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6368/2026 MAHESH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Tiwari, Advocate.versusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP with SI Sandeep Yadav.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 26.02.2026 At the very outset, Mr. Sunil Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, seeks permission to withdraw this bail application without prejudice to the rights and remedies available to the applicant before the Trial Court. The bail application, alongwith the pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the above submissions.PRATEEK JALAN, JFEBRUARY 26, 2026SS/JM/This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/03/2026 at 10:14:47...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »