Delhi Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ajay Jha vs State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 725/2026 AJAY JHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ghanshyam Thakur, Advocate.versusSTATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, Additional Standing Counsel [M: 9818460146]CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 28.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 6883/2026(Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 725/2026 & CRL.M.A. 6882/2026 (for interim protection)1. This matter has been taken up for hearing today [Saturday] at 05:45P.M. upon urgent mentioning before Honble the Chief Justice.2. The petitioners comprising of husband (petitioner No. 1), wife(petitioner No. 2). their two minor children (petitioner Nos. 3 and 4), and the brother of petitioner No. 1 (petitioner No. 5), have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, seeking the following reliefs: a) Issue a writ of mandamus directing Respondent Nos.1 to 3 to...
Prl Projects and Infrastructure Limited vs Union of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2026
$~1&2* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 28.02.2026+ W.P.(C) 2827/2026PRL PROJECTS AND INFRASTRUCTURELIMITED .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent+ W.P.(C) 2836/2026PRL PROJECTS AND INFRASTRUCTURELIMITED .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA .....RespondentPresent: Ms Anusuya Salwan and Ms Nikita Salwan, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Mittal, CGSC Mr. Ankur Saboo Mr. Aviraj Pandey, Advocates and Mr Vinay Kaushik, GP for UOI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAV. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL)CM APPL. 13746/2026(Exemption) in W.P.(C) 2827/2026 CM APPL. 13771/2026(Exemption) in W.P.(C) 2836/20261. Exemptions are allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The applications stand disposed of.W.P.(C) 2827/2026 & CM APPL. 13745/2026(Stay) W.P.(C) 2836/2026 CM APPL. 13770/2026 (Stay)Signed By:PRADEEP W.P. (C) 2827 and 2836 of 2026 Page 1 of 53. These petitions have been filed ...
Prl Projects and Infrastructure Limited vs Union of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2026
$~1&2* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 28.02.2026+ W.P.(C) 2827/2026PRL PROJECTS AND INFRASTRUCTURELIMITED .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent+ W.P.(C) 2836/2026PRL PROJECTS AND INFRASTRUCTURELIMITED .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA .....RespondentPresent: Ms Anusuya Salwan and Ms Nikita Salwan, Advocates for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Mittal, CGSC Mr. Ankur Saboo Mr. Aviraj Pandey, Advocates and Mr Vinay Kaushik, GP for UOI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAV. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL)CM APPL. 13746/2026(Exemption) in W.P.(C) 2827/2026 CM APPL. 13771/2026(Exemption) in W.P.(C) 2836/20261. Exemptions are allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The applications stand disposed of.W.P.(C) 2827/2026 & CM APPL. 13745/2026(Stay) W.P.(C) 2836/2026 CM APPL. 13770/2026 (Stay)Signed By:PRADEEP W.P. (C) 2827 and 2836 of 2026 Page 1 of 53. These petitions have been filed ...
Rajo vs the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 165/2026 RAJO .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Meena Chaudhary Sharma, and Mr. Saurabh Goel, Advs. versusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel with Ms. Priyam Aggarwal, Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya, Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. and SI Priyanka, AHTU, North-West District for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA ORDER % 27.02.2026 W.P.(CRL) 165/2026 1. The learned Standing Counsel has handed over a copy of the Status Report dated 25.02.2026 detailing the various efforts that have been made to trace out the missing person. 2. Till now the whereabouts of the missing person could not be traced. The learned Standing Counsel submits that as the whereabouts of the missing person could not be traced, an FIR shall be registered and further efforts shall be continued to be made to trace out the missing person. 3. Accordi...
Khoobsurat Hotels Private Limited vs Mr Sushil Bhasin & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 68/2025 & CM APPL. 2344/2025 KHOOBSURAT HOTELS PRIVATE LIMITED.....Petitioner Through: None.versusMR SUSHIL BHASIN & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA ORDER % 27.02.2026 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. As nobody has appeared on behalf of the parties, the matter is adjourned. 3. List on 08th September, 2026.RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/sds/abk At 03:00 P.M. 4. Matter again taken up at the request of the learned Counsel for the petitioner. Ms. Aditi Mohan and Mr. Puru Lekhi, learned counsels for petitioner, submits that the matter has been settled between the parties. It is prayed that the petition be disposed of as withdrawn. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-ve...
Neera Batra & Anr. vs Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 439/2026, CM APPL. 2116/2026 & CM APPL. 2117/2026 NEERA BATRA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Lalit Gupta and Ms. Ishita Nautiyal, Advocates.versusTATA POWER DELHI DISTRIBUTION LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Srivasatava, Mr. Moksh Arora, Mr. Santosh Ramdurg, Ms. Charu Roy, Advocates and Mr. Amit Singh, AGM (Legal). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL ORDER % 27.02.2026 1. The matter has been settled in the mediation proceedings before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre (Mediation Centre). 2. The Settlement Agreement dated 19th January 2026 (hereinafter Settlement Agreement) between the petitioners and the respondent/BSES has been placed on record. 3. In terms of the settlement, the entire payment has been made by the petitioners to the respondent/BSES. 4. In light of the aforesaid settlement, the present writ petition, along with all application(s) ...
Lata Yadav vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 118/2026 LATA YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sehgal, Ms. Sunita Choubey, Ms. Himanshi Chauhan, Mr. Vivek Kumar Aurora, Ms. Prathana & Ms. Rani Thakur, Advs.versusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for State. Mr. Mohit Dagar & Ms. Maya Dagar, Advocates for the complainant.CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA ORDER % 27.02.2026 10. By way of the present application, the applicant seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case arising out of FIR bearing No.125/2023, registered at Police Station Jafarpur Kalan, Delhi for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 420/448/468/471/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter 'IPC'). 11. Briefly stated, the present FIR was registered on the complaint of Smt. Sangeeta Devi, who alleged that during her absence from Delhi on 22.02.2023, the applicant Lata Yadav and her husba...
Suhail @ Guddu vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 78/2026, CRL.M.A. 3474/2026, 3475/2026 & 3476/2026SUHAIL @ GUDDU .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Heena, AdvocateversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for StateCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA ORDER % 27.02.20261. Matter taken up on mentioning at the end of the board. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition unconditionally. 3. As requested, the petition and the accompanying applications are dismissed as withdrawn.GIRISH KATHPALIA, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/asThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/02/2026 at 12:10:35...
Priyank Pathak vs University of Delhi Through Its Vice-Chancellor & Or ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
$~93* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1895/2026PRIYANK PATHAK.....Petitioner Through:versusUNIVERSITY OF DELHI THROUGH ITS VICE-CHANCELLOR& ORS......Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder JS Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal, Ms. Aishwarya Malhotra, Ms. Tripta Sharma, Advs. University of Delhi Mr. Preet Pal Singh, Ms. Tanupreet Kaur, Ms. Simran Kumari , Ms. Pooja, Mr. Gaurav, Ms. Medha Sharma, Advs. for BCICORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 07.04.2026CM APPL. 22127/20261. This is an application filed under Section 151 of the CPC, 1908,seeking directions against the respondents to ensure the compliance of the Order dated 27.02.2026 passed in the main petition.2. It is stated that the petitioner has cleared the 4 papers out of totalnumber of 5 papers in the VI Semester and was not permitted to sit in the exam for Paper Code LB-601 Professional Ethics and AccountingSystem on account of detention list.3. For the reasons stated in the appli...
Shyam Veer Singh vs Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision : 27.02.2026 + W.P.(C) 2678/2026 CM APPL. 13028/2026SHYAM VEER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ratnesh Sharma, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Gupta SPC, Mr. Vidur Dwivedi GP, Insp. Sanjay Kumar, SI Manjunath, Sunder lal, A.C CISFCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAV. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL)1. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-I. Issue a writ, order or direction(s) to the Respondent Authorities in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ quashing and setting aside the impugned Office Order bearing S. No. 42099/CSIF/TAJ/CO/Admin/2026-748 dated 07.02.2026 whereby the Petitioner has been transferred/relieved from Taj Mahal Unit, Agra to DHEP Dulhasti; AND/OR II. In the alternative, and without prejudice to prayer(a) above, issue a writ, order or direction in the natureof mandamus or any other...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »