Delhi Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhagwati Devi vs Uoi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-31-2026
$~7, 8, 16 & 17* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI(7) + W.P.(C) 6231/2006 & W.P.(C) 6232-6234/2006ANITA DEVI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Dheeraj Sharma, Adv.(8) + W.P.(C) 8959/2006 URMILA DEVI .....Petitioner(16) + W.P.(C) 15760/2006 & W.P.(C) 15761-15762/2006KASTURI DEVI .....Respondent(17) + W.P.(C) 8868/2008 BHAGWATI DEVI .....PetitionerCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 31.01.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the Respondent/Ms. Anita Devi submits that despite his best efforts, he is unable to contact the Respondent.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Union of India(UOI) submits that the present Petitions have been listed for hearing after nearly 20 years and that during the pendency of these Petitions, the Applicants, namely Ms. Anita Devi, Ms. Urmila Devi, Ms. Kasturi Devi, Ms. Bhagwati Devi, were not paid family pension on the ground that they had been granted compassionate appointments fol...
Neena Gupta & Anr. vs the State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 89/2026 NEENA GUPTA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocate with petitionersversusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel with Mr. Abhinav Kumar, Mr. Aryan Sachdeva and Mr. Priyam Aggarwal, Advocates with Insp. Daya Nand Yadav, SI Chetan, P.S.Paschim Vihar, West. Mr. Ankur Aggarwal and Mr. Ananay Lamba, Advocates for respondent no.3. Ms. Shyel Trehan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rohan Poddar, Ms. Vidhi Jain, Mr. Dinesh Kumar Chouhan and Mr. Vaibhav Raj Singh Rathore, Advocates for R-5. Mr. Brijesh Kumar Gupta for respondents Sanjiv Kumar Gupta and Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA ORDER % 30.01.2026 1. This petition has been filed under Article 226 of theThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi Hig...
Saharsh Bhalla vs the High Court of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 280/2025 & CM APPL. 1366/2025, CM APPL. 1367/2025 SAHARSH BHALLA .....Petitioner Through: None. Versus THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mrs Avnish Ahlawat, SC GNCTD Mr. Uday Singh Ahlawat, Ms. Tania Ahlawat, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER % 30.01.2026 1. It is brought to our notice through various orders passed by this Court that the petitioner is not appearing in the matter. 2. It is claimed by counsel appearing for the respondents that even otherwise, the subject matter of this petition has rendered infructuous as the selection process for the period for which the petitioner has claimed relief, is already completed. 3. That being so, the writ petition stands dismissed as being infructuous as well as for non-prosecution.NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, JAJAY DIGPAUL, J JANUARY 30, 2026/ay/ssThis is a digitally sig...
Ps Toll Road Pvt Ltd vs National Highways Authority of India
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 39/2026 & I.A. 598/2026 PS TOLL ROAD PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Asif Ahmed & Ms. Bhanu Jindel, Advs.versusNATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain & Ms. Sakshi Mand, Advs.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN ORDER % 30.01.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to the prayer made. 3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by six months. 4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, J JANUARY 30, 2026 haThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order i...
Gautami Kawale and Anr vs John Doe and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 33/2026 X AND ANR .....Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Diya Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Nakul Gandhi, Adv.versusJOHN DOE AND ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Ankit Parhar, Mr. Abhishek Kumar and Ms. Sanchli Sethi, Advs. for D-44 (X. Corp.). Mr. Ankit Parhar and Ms. Sneha Dey, Advs. for D-43 (Reddit). Ms. Amee Rana, Ms. Sana Banyal and Ms. Bhavnish Kaur, Advs. for D- 42. Ms. Mamta Rani, Mr. Rohan Ahuja, Ms. Shruttima Shersa, Mr. Aiswarya Debardarsini, Ms. Vareesha Irfan and Ms. Jahanvi Agarwal, Advs. for D-45. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN ORDER % 30.01.2026CS(OS) 33/2026 & I.A. 705/2026 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 r/w Section 151 CPC)1. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiffs praying for decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from publishing, transmitting, reposting, hyper linking, advertising, or otherwise circulating any impugned AI-generated, morphed and/or ph...
Flipkart Internet Private Limited vs Central Consumer Protection Autho ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~87 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1245/2026 & CM APPL. 6187/2026 FLIPKART INTERNET PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dheeraj Nair, Mr. Sukrit Seth, Ms. Vishrutyi Sahni and Mr. Sahir Seth, Advs.versusCENTRAL CONSUMER PROTECTION AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ranjeev Khatana, SPC.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV ORDER % 30.01.2026 1. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, learned senior counsel, on instructions, seeks liberty to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law. 2. With the aforesaid liberty, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 3. All rights and contentions are left open.PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JANUARY 30, 2026/SH/ AMGThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DH...
Parvindra Kumar vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 328/2026 PARVINDRA KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Singh Pilania, Mr. A.P. Sidharth, Mr. Girdhari Singh, Mr. Rishabh Sharma and Ms. Kirti Prabha, Advocates. Petitioner via video-conferencing. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State. SI Sumeet Ponia, P.S., Vivek Vihar. Mr. Dikshant Khanna, Advocate for R-2 and R-2 in court. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI ORDER % 30.01.2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner, who is the former husband of the complainant/respondent No.2, seeks quashing of case FIR No.387/2021 dated 14.08.2021 registered under sections 498A/406/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at P.S.: Vivek Vihar, Shahdara, Delhi. 2. The petition is premised on Compromise-cum-Settlement Deed dated 18.11.2025 signed between the ...
M/S Sandhya Finance Ltd. vs Naresh Kumar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 123/2026, I.A. 2568/2026, I.A. 2569/2026 & I.A. 2570/2026M/S SANDHYA FINANCE LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Inderjot Kaur, Adv. (through VC)versusNARESH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Ms. Monika & Mr. Amandeep Mehra, Advs. (through VC)CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN ORDER % 30.01.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to the prayer made. 3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by three months. 4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, J JANUARY 30, 2026 haThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. T...
Sarit Chawla & Anr. vs Leena Gandhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 776/2026, CRL.M.A. 3095/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3096/2026 SARIT CHAWLA & ANR. ..Petitioners Through: Ms. Prachi Goel with Mr. Amit Kumar Jha, Advocates. versusLEENA GANDHI ..Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 30.01.2026 1. Petitioners seek quashing of summoning order dated 12.05.2023 and all consequent proceedings arising out of the complaint in question, which have been filed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. 2. After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, does not press the present petition and seeks liberty to take other appropriate remedy in accordance with law. 3. The present petition is, accordingly, disposed of as not pressed. Liberty, as prayed, is granted. 4. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. 5. All pending applications also stand disposed of....
Chintu Chauhan vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 151/2026 CHINTU CHAUHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohd. Arif, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 30.01.2026 1. The applicant/accused seeks grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR No. 480/2025 dated 16.12.2025, registered at P.S. Tigri, for commission of offences under Sections 110/351/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Sections 308/503/506/507/34 of IPC). 2. When the application was taken up on 15.01.2026, it was informed that aggravated offence i.e. 109(1) BNS (corresponding Section 307 IPC) has been added in place of 110 BNS (corresponding Section 308 IPC). 3. The alleged incident took place on 12.12.2025 and, even as per the bare allegation appearing in the FIR, the complainant did not know the alleged assailants, beforehand. However, he claimed that h...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »