Delhi Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rama Pandey & Ors. vs State of Delhi Through Sho Mangol Puri & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 746/2026 RAMA PANDEY & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Divakar Upadhyaya, Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Singh Parmar, Advocate. Petitioners in court. versus STATE OF DELHI THROUGH SHO MANGOL PURI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State. S.I. Satish Kumar, P.S: Mangol Puri. Ms. Seeta Mishra and Mr. Deepak, Advocates for R-2. R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI ORDER % 29.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 2965/2026 Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of. CRL.M.C. 746/2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners, who are the former in-laws and husband of the complainant/respondent No. 2, seek quashing of case FIR No. 1114/2022 dated 07.10.2022 registered under sections 498-A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 (IPC), at P.S.: Man...
Pawan Kumar & Ors. vs the State Goverment of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 310/2026 PAWAN KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Petitioners with their counselversusTHE STATE GOVERMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for State with Mr Sangeet Sibou, Mr Aniket Kumar Singh and Mr Priyansh Raj Singh Senger, Advs. R-2 with her counsel Mr Amit Kumar and Mr Shashikant Sharma, Advs.CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA ORDER % 11.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 7186/2026 1. By way of the present application, the petitioners are seeking recall of the order dated 29.01.2026, vide which the present writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. 2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the order dated 29.01.2026 is recalled and the writ petition is restored to its original number. 3. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 310/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2962/2026 4. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR...
Ravi vs Himani & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~130 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 48/2026 & CRL.M.As. 3022-25/2026 RAVI .....Revisionist Through: Mr. Abhik Chimni, Ms. Pranjal Abrol, Mr. Gurupal Singh, Ms. Moksha Sharma and Mr. Ayan Dasgupta, AdvocatesversusHIMANI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: NoneCORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % 29.01.2026 After some arguments, Mr. Abhik Chimni, learned counsel for the revisionist, seeks permission to withdraw the present revision petition, with liberty to avail such remedies as may be available to the revisionist before the learned Family Court, in accordance with law. In view of the aforesaid, the present revision petition, alongwith the pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the maintainability, merits, or the availability of any remedy which the revisionist may seek to pursue.PRATEEK JALAN, J JANUARY 29, 2026/dy/SD/...
Vishal Narender Pal vs the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~83 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 303/2026, CRL.M.A. 2918/2026-Exp VISHAL NARENDER PAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Prasad, AdvocateversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for State with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advocate with SI Puran Singh, PS: Dabri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE ORDER % 29.01.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India Constitution read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks direction to the respondent to release the petitioner on parole for a period of four weeks. 2. Though learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the order dated 23.01.2026 passed by this Court in CRL.M.A. 2542/2025 in W.P.(CRL) 3009/2026, whereby the applicant was given liberty to file a fresh application for grant of parole before the Jail Authority, however, since no such application ...
Shabana Alam Through G.P.a Holder Mr Jamshed Alam vs M/S Associated Jo ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. 29/2026 & CM APPL. 6174/2026 CM APPL. 6175/2026 SHABANA ALAM THROUGH G.P.A HOLDER MR JAMSHED ALAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohit Gupta, Mr. Adit Sharma, Advs. versusM/S ASSOCIATED JOURNAL LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Varun K. Chopra, Mr. Dipu Kumar Jha, Mr. Rahul Tomar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. Mr. Mohit Gupta, counsel for petitioner, seeks to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise pleas during arguments at the post trial stage. 2. Needless to say, observations made in the impugned orders dated 16th December 2025 and 25th July 2025, related to the merits of the matter shall not be determinative of the issues in question. 3. The Trial Court, after completion of the evidence, shall take a final view on the issues. 4. The Trial Court is expected to proceed with the matter. 5. Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty granted. 6. ...
Pooja and Ors vs the State (N.C.T of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~116 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 737/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2937/2026 POOJA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Appearance not given.versusTHE STATE (N.C.T OF DELHI) AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Priyanka Saini, P.S. Bindapur.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN ORDER % 29.01.2026 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners in the criminal proceedings. Accordingly, the petition, alongwith pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid.PRATEEK JALAN, J JANUARY 29, 2026 Bhupi/KA/This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 14:04:50...
Sanjeev Khatri & Anr. vs State,Delhi Police & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 804/2024 SANJEEV KHATRI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Petitioners with their counselversusSTATE,DELHI POLICE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with Mr. Chetan Dahiya, Adv. along with SI Mahesh. R-2 and R-3 with their counsel CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. By way of present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR bearing no. 370/2017, registered at Police Station Kalkaji, Delhi for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 287/304A/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC). 2. The petitioners and respondent nos. 2 and 3 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer (IO) from Police Station Kalkaji, Delhi. 3. Briefly stated, facts of the present case are that petitioner no. 1 was carrying out constructions work on his property and, on 0...
M/S Jmd Cranes vs M/S the Indure Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~48* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 226/2025M/S JMD CRANES .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nidish Gupta, Advocate throughVC.versusM/S THE INDURE PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 29.01.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.CM APPL. 5906/2026 (for withdrawal of petition)2. The present application has been filed by the petitioner under Article227 of the Constitution of India, seeking withdrawal of the present petition.3. No one has appeared on behalf of the respondent despite service of theadvance notice.4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition bedisposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to take appropriate remedies.5. Keeping in view the submissions made by ld. Counsel for thepetitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as sought, in accordance with law.6. The next date of hearing before Cou...
Gurvinder Singh & Anr. vs Amrit Mohan Prasad Director General Sashastr ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 237/2025 GURVINDER SINGH & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Joby Varghese, Mr. Jasmeet Singh Randhawa and Ms. Rashi, Advocates.versusAMRIT MOHAN PRASAD DIRECTOR GENERAL SASHASTRASEEMA BAL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shrey Sharawat, SPC along with Mr. Yash Chaturvedi, Advocate forUOI.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 29.01.20261. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that directions containedin the order dated 24.07.2024 passed in W.P.(C) 601/2023 stands complied with. The same is not disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.2. Consequently, no orders are required to be passed in the presentpetition; the same is, accordingly, disposed of.SACHIN DATTA, JJANUARY 29, 2026/rThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Se...
Retail Royalty Company and Anr vs Rupesh Vishvambar Paithane, Trading ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 192/2025 & I.As. 5719/2025, 12442/2025 RETAIL ROYALTY COMPANY AND ANR .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Urfee Roomi, Mr. Ayush Dixit and Ms. Vanshika Bansal, Advocates.versusRUPESH VISHVAMBAR PAITHANE, TRADING AS CHAITANYA ENTERPRISES .....Defendant Through: Ms. Archana Gaur, Advocate (DHCLSC) and Ms. Ridhima Gaur, Advocate. Mr. Rupesh Vishvambar Paithane, Defendant in person through VC.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGHORDER% 29.01.20261. Ms. Archana Gaur, learned counsel for the Defendant submits thatpursuant to order dated 23.01.2026 in I.A. 12442/2025, an affidavit of undertaking has been filed on 27.01.2026, however, the same is not on record. Let the same be brought on record during the course of the day. However, copy of the said affidavit of undertaking is handed over in Court and is taken on record.2. By this suit, Plaintiffs inter alia seek injunction against the Defendantand all others acting on its...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »