Delhi Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Karan & Anr. vs State of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 600/2026 KARAN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Avinash Das, Advocate with Mr. Nikhil Yadav, Advocate and Ms. Shatakshi Rai, Advocate. Petitioners in court. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State. S.I. Gurtej Singh, P.S: J.P. Kalan. Respondents Nos. 2 and 3 in court. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI ORDER % 29.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 2373/2026 Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. Let requisite compliances be made within 01 week. The application stands disposed-of. CRL.M.C. 600/2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 0002/2026 dated 02.01.2026 registered under sections 333/115(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) at P.S.: Jaffarpur Kalan, Dwarka, Delhi. 2. The petition is premised on Affid...
Arun Kumar Dhawan & Anr. vs Niti Dhawan
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 179/2026 & CM APPL. 4849/2026 ARUN KUMAR DHAWAN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Arjun Anand, Ms. Priyam Wadhawan & Ms. Isha Shukla, Advs.versusNITI DHAWAN .....Respondent Through:CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeks the following prayers:- a) Allow the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the impugned order dated 21.01.2026 passed by the Honble Court of Sh. Lovleen, PJFC- 02, West District, Tis Hazari Courts thereby directing the respondent to bring the minor child namely Master Angad Dhawan to perform the hawan on the account of death anniversary of the father of Master Angad Dhawan in the interest of justice;b) Set aside the impugned order dated 21.01.2026 passed by the Honble Court of Sh. Lovleen, PJFC-02,...
Pankaj Kumar and Ors vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 727/2026PANKAJ KUMAR AND ORS .....PetitionersThrough: Mr. Vineet Jain, Advocate with petitioners in court.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....RespondentsThrough: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State with S.I. Rupesh Raj, P.S: Subhash Place, Delhi. R-2 in court.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI ORDER % 29.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 2908/2026 Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of. CRL.M.C. 727/2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners, who are the husband and in-laws of the complainant/respondent No. 2, seek quashing of case FIR No. 436/2017 dated 04.09.2017 registered under sections 498-A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at P.S.: Subhash Place, North West, Delhi.CRL.M.C. 727/2026 Page 1 of 3 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from D...
Mangloor Highways Private Limited vs National Highways Authority of In ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 115/2026 MANGLOOR HIGHWAYS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Samiron Borkataky, Mr. Ikshvaaku Marwah, Ms. Sanskriti Shrimali, Mr. Saurav Kumar, Advs with Mr. Anuj Bhave, AR. (through VC) versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Subhash Bhat, Ms. Lisha Chauhan, Ms. Nikita Sharma & Ms. Parwati Sharma, Advs. (through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to the prayer made. 3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by six months. 4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, J JANUARY 29, 2026 haThis is a digitally signed...
M/S Ashok Sharma and Associates Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs Pegasus Assets Rec ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1242/2026 & CM APPL. 6085/2026 M/S ASHOK SHARMA AND ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Malvika Trivedi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Nikhil Palu, Mr. Ashish Kumar Sharma & Ms. Niyati Razdan, Advs.versusPEGASUS ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION PVT LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amar Dave, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Usha Singh & Mr. Shahrukh Inam, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Rajeev Mehra, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Pranati Bhatnagar & Mr. Dhairya B., Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR ORDER % 29.01.2026 CM APPL. 6086/2026 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1242/2026 & CM APPL. 6085/2026 (stay) 3. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of appropriate writ, orders or directions in the nature of w...
Bikanervala Foods Pvt. Ltd vs M/S Namaste Foods & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 116/2026 & I.A. 2480/2026 BIKANERVALA FOODS PVT. LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Umesh Mishra, Adv.versusM/S NAMASTE FOODS & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Rattan, Adv. (through VC)CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN ORDER % 29.01.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to the prayer made. 3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by six months. 4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.AVNEESH JHINGAN, J JANUARY 29, 2026 haThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 0...
Union of India and Anr. vs Sh Ashok Kumar
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1213/2026, CAV 40/2026 and CM APPL. 5938/2026 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Neeraj Dubey, SPC.versusSH ASHOK KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Prem Chand, Mr. Chander Bhan, Advs.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJ.AN ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. Learned counsel representing the Petitioners, at the outset, seeks permission to withdraw the present Petition with liberty to file a fresh Petition. 2. The present Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.AMIT MAHAJAN, J. JANUARY 29, 2026 jai/palThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 14:45:41...
Surinder Singh Rihal vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1218/2026 SURINDER SINGH RIHAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Adv versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL ORDER % 20.04.2026 CM APPL. 25430/2026 1. This is an application seeking marking of appearance for respondent No. 2 in the order dated 29.01.2026. 2. It is stated that Ms. Anushree Narain, SSC for respondent No. 2 had appeared and assisted this Court on 29.01.2026 but inadvertently her appearance could not be marked. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the prayer. 4. Accordingly, let the appearance of Ms. Anushree Narain, SSC for respondent No. 2 be read in the order dated 29.01.2026. 5. The application stands disposed of.NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, JAJAY DIGPAUL, J APRIL 20, 2026/DMThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verif...
Shakuntala Devi vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~76 to 78 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 390/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2976/2026 SHAKUNTALA DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Surjeet Singh with Mr. Raju Sonkar, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State. + BAIL APPLN. 394/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2989/2026 ANU KUMARI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Surjeet Singh with Mr. Raju Sonkar, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State. + BAIL APPLN. 395/2026 & CRL.M.A. 3007/2026 CHUNNU KUMAR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Surjeet Singh with Mr. Raju Sonkar, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI ORDER % 29.01.2026 Ms. Shubhi Gupta, learned APP appearing for the State takes a preliminary objection to submit, that the petitioners have approached this court directly without fir...
Prakash Gupta vs Govt (Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~103 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1233/2026 & CM APPL. 5991/2026 PRAKASH GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Samman Vardhan Gautam, Ms. Khushi Sharma, Mr. Priyam Tiwari andMs. Anshika Priyadarshini, Advocates. versusGOVT (NCT) OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Nitika Bhutani, Adv.CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. The petitioner confines his prayer to the extent of directing the Divisional Commissioner to expedite the hearing of the petitioners appeal. 2. It is submitted that 7-8 months have elapsed since the filing of the appeal, however, there has not been any substantial hearing. 3. The Court is not inclined to manage the board of the Divisional Commissioner. The micro management of the Board will have to be take place as per the workload of the concerned authority. However, liberty to emphasise for early disposal of the appeal is granted to the petitioner. If such a request is made, the Court...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »