Delhi Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sandeep vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13003/2018 SANDEEP .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Chandrika Upadhyaya, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Narain, SSC with Mr. Naman Choula and Mr. Yamit Jetley, Advs. for R-2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBREHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAULORDER% 30.01.2026 CM APPL. 6591/2026 (Delay of 334 days)1. For the reasons disclosed in the application, the delay of 334 days in filing the restoration application is condoned.2. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 6590/2026 (Restoration)3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/applicant.4. Since the petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the counsel failed to appear, we deem it appropriate to restore the petition.5. The applications, accordingly, stand allowed. W.P.(C) 13003/20186. It is the case of the petitioner that he purchased a vehicle. He is entitled for the concessional rate of GST being...
Mala Devi vs State & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 805/2018 MALA DEVI .....Appellant Through:versusSTATE & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with SI Saurabh Kumar, PS Shalimar Bagh. Mr. Vidit Gupta and Mr. Trivesh Sharma, Advocates for respondents no. 2 to 5.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHAORDER% 10.03.20261. This matter has been listed on an office note.2. Vide order dated 30.01.2026, the matter has been sent back to the Sessions Court and the appellant has been directed to appear before the Sessions Court on 17.02.2026.3. Hence, the date already fixed, i.e., 11.03.2026 shall stand cancelled. CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J MARCH 10, 2026/kdThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2026 at 10:14:57...
Deep Narayan Surya Kumar Smriti Mahavidyalaya (D.El.ED) vs National Co ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~112 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 696/2026 & CM APPL. 3426/2026 DEEP NARAYAN SURYA KUMAR SMRITI MAHAVIDYALAYA (D.EL.ED) .....Petitioner Through: Mr Brijendra Singh Advocate versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH ORDER % 29.01.2026CM APPL. 3427/2026 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 696/20261. This writ petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:- (a) quashing of withdrawal order dated 10.09.2025 issued by the respondentNo.2, withdrawing recognition of the D.El.Ed. courses of petitioner institution, in an arbitrary and illegal manner; and (b) direction to respondent no.2 to issue order of restoration, thereby restoring recognition of D.El.Ed. courses of the petitioner institution with all ...
Sonia Mahila Mahavidyalaya (D.El.ED) vs National Council for Teacher E ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~98 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 780/2026 & CM APPL. 3883/2026 SONIA MAHILA MAHAVIDYALAYA (D.EL.ED) .....Petitioner Through: Mr Brijendra Singh AdvocateversusNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. This writ petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:- (a) quashing of withdrawal order dated 10.09.2025 issued by the respondentNo.2, withdrawing recognition of the D.El.Ed. courses of petitioner institution, in an arbitrary and illegal manner; and (b) direction to respondent no.2 to issue order of restoration, thereby restoring recognition of D.El.Ed. courses of the petitioner institution with all the benefits of being a recognised institute; and (c) consequent direction to respondent no.2 to update its website by displaying the ...
Sudama vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 216/2026 SUDAMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.P. Singh (DHCLSC) with Mr. Nitej Kumar & Mr. Poorna, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.), Mr. Abhinav Kumar, Mr. Aryan Sachdeva & Mr. Priyam Agarwal, Advs. Mr. Anil Kumar, SI, P.S. Dabri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 18.03.2026 CRL.M.A. 8222/2026 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.A. 8221/2026(corrections/modifications of orders) 1. The applicant, who has been granted parole, seeks modification in order dated 29.01.2026, simply for the reason that his family members have not been able to arrange surety. He, therefore, seeks his release on personal bond or cash surety. 2. However, before taking any final decision with respect to abovesaid aspect, learned Standing Counsel for respondent who appears on advance notice, is requested to place on r...
Abhishek vs State (Govt of Nct of Delhi )
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 276/2026 ABHISHEK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shatrughan Singh, Advocate.versusSTATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP with ASI Ravinder Singh.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN ORDER % 29.01.20261. Applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No.0984/2025 dated 25.10.2025, for commission of offences under Sections 109(1)/3(5) BNS 2023, (corresponding Sections 307/34 IPC) registered at P.S. Burari. 2. A cursory look at the averments appearing in the FIR would indicate that on the relevant date, the complainant-Ashok Yadav was beaten up by accused-Rohit along with the co-accused persons, namely Karan, Krishn @ Kallu and Prem. Accused-Rohit exhorted his associates saying that today he (Ashok) should not be spared and, thereafter, co-accused-Karan took out a knife and stabbed the complainant with the intention to kill him, and other co-accused i.e. Rohit, al...
Suhani Sheikh and Anr vs Devender Malhotra
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 11/2023, CM APPL. 787/2023 (stay), CM APPL.788/2023 (delay), CM APPL. 40999/2023 (for impleadment), CM APPL. 41000/2023 (stay) SUHANI SHEIKH AND ANR .....Appellants Through: NoneversusDEVENDER MALHOTRA .....Respondent Through: Counsel for Respondent (appearance not given). CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA ORDER % 29.01.2026 CM APPL.41001/2023 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The Application stands disposed of. RFA 11/2023 3. Learned counsel for the Respondent submits that the decree already stands executed and the possession has been handed over to the Respondent. 4. None is present on behalf of the Appellants. 5. The Appeal along with the Applications, is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J JANUARY 29, 2026/RSThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Porta...
Renew Wind Energy AP2 Pvt Ltd vs Solar Energy Corporation of India Lim ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1103/2026 with CM APPL. 5441/2026 RENEW WIND ENERGY AP2 PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Buddy A. Ranganadhan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vishrov Mukerjee, Mr. Girik Bhalla, Ms. Priyanka Vyas and Mr. Anuj Berry, Advocates.versusSOLAR ENERGY CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Anushree Bardhan, Ms. Somya Sahani, Ms. Ritika Singh and Ms. Rashmi Vaish, Advocates for R-1.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL ORDER % 29.01.20261. This order may be read in continuation with the order passed by this Court on 27th January, 2026. 2. Counsel for the parties inform the Court that the application for interim relief filed by the respondent no.1 before the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) could not be taken up on 28th January, 2026 and is now posted on 5th February, 2026. 3. Counsel for the respondent no.1 submits that the respondent no.1 has informed its bankers that no pr...
Vikas Gumber vs Commissioner of Cgst, Anti Evasion Branch, Delhi East
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 39/2026 & CRL.M.A. 2430/2026 VIKAS GUMBER .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Akshita Jain, Adv.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CGST, ANTI EVASION BRANCH, DELHI EAST .....Respondent Through: Mr.Arun Khatri, Ms. Shelly Dixit and Ms. Tracy Sebastian, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant bail application. 2. Bail application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. 3. The date fixed, i.e. 06.02.2026 stands cancelled. 4. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J JANUARY 29, 2026/A/GJThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/02/2026 at 1...
Vinod Kumar B.a. vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 294/2026, CM APPL. 1398/2026 VINOD KUMAR B.A. .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Balendu Shekhar, CGSC, Mr. Krishna Chaitanya, Mr. Divyansh Singh Dev and Mr. Rajkumar Maurya, Advs. Mr. Vinay Kaushik, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA ORDER % 29.01.20261. Mr. Balendu Shekhar, learned counsel for the respondents states that the respondents have decided to grant appointment to the petitioner as a Constable (General Duty) in Border Security Force, subject to fulfilment of conditions as per Rules. 2. Noting the said submission, we dispose of the petition along with pending application on the ground that the relief as sought for has been satisfied.V. KAMESWAR RAO, JMANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J JANUARY 29, 2026/srThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the orde...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »