Competition Appellate Tribunal Court May 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Dlf Limited and Another Vs. Competition Commission of India and O ...
Court: Competition Appellate Tribunal
Decided on: May-19-2014
V.S. Sirpurkar, Chairman 1. In this judgment, we shall be dealing with Appeal Nos. 20 of 2011, 22 of 2011, 23 of 2011, 12 of 2012, 19 of 2012, 20 of 2012, 8 of 2013, 9 of 2013, 11 of 2013 and 29 of 2013. These Appeals can be grouped as under:- Group 1: Appeal No. 20 of 2011, Appeal No. 22 of 2011 and Appeal No. 19 of 2012. Group 2: Appeal No. 23 of 2011, Appeal No. 12 of 2012, Appeal No. 20 of 2012 and Appeal No. 29 of 2013. Group 3: Appeal No. 8 of 2013, Appeal No. 9 of 2013, and Appeal No. 11 of 2013. 2. The 1st group consists of Appeal No. 20 of 2011 which relates to Competition Commission of India (in short the 'CCI') Case No. 19 of 2010 in which Belaire Owners Association CBOA0 was the Informant. Appeal 22 of 2011 relates to CCI Case No. 18 of 2010 in which Park Place Resident Welfare Association ('PP-RWA' was the Informant. Appeal No. 19 of 2012 relates to CCI Case No. 67 of 2010 in which the Magnolia Flat Owners Association ('MFOA') and one Shri Rahul Kapoor were the Informant. ...
M/S. International Cylinder(P) Ltd. and Others Vs. Competition Commiss ...
Court: Competition Appellate Tribunal
Decided on: May-05-2014
1. This is an application by the CCI seeking extension of period by another 45 days w.e.f. 1st May, 2014. 2. Number of Cylinder Manufacturer Concerns had filed appeals before us challenging the order of the CCI holding them guilty of the breach of some provision of the Competition Act. As also the resultant penalties had ordered by the CCI. The appeals were partly heard and allowed in the sense that though the appeals were dismissed on merits the Tribunal remanded the matter to the CCI with the direction to re-hear the parties on the question of penalties. Those penalties were directed to be decided in the light of the observations made by this Tribunal. 3. This Tribunal had given the time upto 1st May, 2014. It was also observed that the parties were to approach the CCI by 1st February, 2014 for the purpose of filing their documents as well as the applications etc. That did not happen. Some of the parties did approach the CCI; however, some did not approach the CCI in time. Therefore,...
M/S. Fast Way Transmission Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Kansan News Pvt. L ...
Court: Competition Appellate Tribunal
Decided on: May-02-2014
HON'BLE MEMBER, SHRI RAHUL SARIN: 1. An appeal has been filed under Section 53-B of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") challenging the order of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) dated 03.07.2012 passed in Case No. 26/2011. 2. At the outset, it will be useful to recount brief facts of the case. An information was filed by M/s. Kansan News Pvt. Ltd. (Informant before CCI and the respondent No. 1 herein) under Section 19(1)(a) of the Act for the alleged infringement of Sections 3 and 4 of the Act. The informant is a broadcaster of news and current affairs TV channel named 'Day and Night News' operating in the states of Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh and Union Territory of Chandigarh. The Appellants are engaged in the business of distribution of cable network channels of broadcasters. They are M/s. Fastway Transmmissions Pvt. Ltd. (Appellant No. 1), M/s. Hathway Sukhamrit Cable and Datacom Pvt. Ltd. (Appellant No. 2) and M/s. Creative Cable Network ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›