Chhattisgarh Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manoj Sharma Vs. The State of C.G. and Others
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Apr-18-2016
1. The petitioner would assail the legality and validity of the order passed by the SP, Rajnandgaon on 11.3.2003 dismissing him from service; the appellate order dated 9.6.2003 passed by the IG, Police, Raipur Range and the order dismissing his mercy petition by the DGP, PHQ, Raipur in October, 2003 whereby his appeal and mercy petition were dismissed. 2. The petitioner was appointed as Constable in the District Force Rajnandgaon on 7.5.1993. He was served with a charge sheet in February, 2003 vide Annexure-P/1 imputing the following 3 charges:- (i) he remained unauthorizedly absent for a period of 43 days from 21.9.2002 to 4.11.2002 which violated Rule 3 of the CG Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1965. (ii) he committed indecent act with the prosecutrix and thus committed serious misconduct tarnishing the image of the department. (iii) despite having been punished earlier, he did not improve upon his conduct and thus making himself unsuitable for rendering service in the Police Departm...
Renu Sharma Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Raipur ( ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Apr-13-2016
CAV Order: 1. Invoking extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner herein seeks to challenge appointment of respondent No.3 as a member of District Consumer Redressal Forum, Rajnandgaon. 2. The aforesaid challenge has been made on the following factual backdrop:- 2.1 The State Government in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1A) of Section 10 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1986') on the recommendation of the Selection Committee appointed the petitioner as a Member of District Consumer Redressal Forum, Rajnandgaon by order dated 29th August, 2008, which she has completed on 2.9.2013. Upon completion of the petitioner's tenure, fresh applications were called for by issuing press-release by the Collector, Rajnandgaon, in which the petitioner, respondent No.3 as well as 23 other candidates submitted their candidature for a Member of District Consumer Redressal Forum, Rajnandg...
Sunderlal Patel and Another Vs. The High Court of Chhattisgarh, throug ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Apr-11-2016
CAV Order: 1. Father of our Nation said: - To deprive a man of his natural liberty and to deny to him the ordinary amenities of life is worse than starving the body; it is starvation of the soul, the dweller in the body. Mahatma Gandhi 2. Complaining infringement of their fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India i.e. protection of life and personal liberty, the petitioners herein, who are two in numbers, have filed this writ petition stating inter alia that they have been unlawfully and illegally detained by respondents No.2 and 3 for 113 days depriving them of their personal liberty and therefore, they are entitled for monetary compensation from the respondents jointly and severally, and also seek a direction for holding departmental action for illegal detention against respondent No.2/respondent No.3. 3. The writ petitioners have sought the above-stated relief(s) on the following factual backdrop:- 3.1) The petitioners herein were charge-sheeted an...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›