Chhattisgarh Court November 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Navbharat Press Karmachari Kalyan Sangh Through its President Vs. Stat ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-30-2015
Cav Order (1) The determining issue falling for consideration would be whether the appropriate Government failed to refer actual/real industrial dispute existing between the parties to the labour court for adjudication in exercise of power conferred under Section 10 (2) of The Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 ? (2) Dainik Navbharat Press, Bilaspur through its Manager, respondent No. 5 herein, made an application to the Assistant Labour Commissioner under The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the I.D. Act ) stating inter alia that the petitioner-Sangh in collusion with respondent No. 6 herein, Navbharath Press Karmachari Sangh went into illegal strike on 9.8.2014 at 7 p.m., consequently publication of newspaper was disrupted on 10.8.2014 and 11.8.2014 and, as such, the strike called by petitioner-Sangh in collusion with respondent No. 6 is prima facie illegal strike, as no notice was served before undertaking strike and the provisions contained in Sections 22 and 23 ...
Sukhnandan Ram Rajwade Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secr ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-18-2015
Cav Order 1. Challenge in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is to the impugned memo dated 4-6-2011 (Annexure P/1) whereby the Deputy Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare, Sarguja, has informed the petitioner about the rejection of his prayer for grant of compassionate appointment. 2. Facts of the case, as projected by the petitioner, briefly stated, are that the petitioner s father late Shri Salikram Rajwade was working as Assistant Gram Panchayat Officer (Gram Sahayak) at Gram Panchayat Bhafauli, Janpad Panchayat Ambikapur. He died in harness on 31-3-2009 at village Kanchanpur leaving behind his widow and two sons, including the petitioner. The petitioner has averred that co-incidentally 31-3-2009 was the date of superannuation of his father, therefore, since he died in course of service, the petitioner moved an application for compassionate appointment on 5-8-2009 (sic 5-3-2009 mentioned in para 8.4), which was not entertained on the ground that the petit...
Vinod Rathore and Others Vs. Commissioner, Bilaspur Municipal Corporat ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-16-2015
Cav Order 1. Chief question falling for consideration is whether the respondent No.3 Meinhart Singapore Pvt. Ltd., a Multinational Company, which has established place of business within India, under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, 1956, is an instrumentality of the State or other authority under Article 12 of the Constitution of India? 2. The Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur respondent No.1 herein entered into agreement with Meinhart Singapore Pvt. Ltd. respondent No.3 herein, a multinational company having established place of business within India, under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 on 09.11.2006 for construction of sanitary sewerage system in Bilaspur city covering an area of 30.42 sq.km.. The petitioners were appointed as Engineers by order dated 05.09.2011 for providing consultancy service for planning, designing and supervision of execution of sanitary sewerage system for Bilaspur city till the completion of project, on a gross remuneration of 30,0...
Hema Bai Sahu @ Hima Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secret ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-05-2015
Order On Board (1) Heard finally with the consent of learned counsel for the parties. (2) The petitioner is an elected member from constituency No.5 of Zila Panchayat, Durg. Her election has been challenged by respondent No.7 by preferring an election petition before the Director (Panchayat) under Section 122 of the Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993. (3) On receipt of notice from the Election Tribunal, the petitioner raised an objection to the maintainability of the election petition, on submission that there is non-compliance of mandatory provisions contained under Rules 3(2) of the Chhattisgarh Panchayats (Election Petitions, Corrupt Practices and Disqualification for Membership) Rules, 1995 (in short the Rules, 1995 ), inasmuch as, copies supplied to her did not carry the attestation and signature of the election petitioner in the manner required in the law. Respondent No.7 contested the said application on submission that the above said Rule has been duly complied with. (4) Mr. Sunil O...
C.H. Kodand Rao Vs. Union of India through the AMC Centre and School R ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-05-2015
Order on Board 1. Lieutenant Colonel/Commanding Officer in exercise of power conferred under Section 91 (i) of the Army Act, 1950 (for short the Act of 1950 ) passed an order of penal deduction from the salary of the petitioner, who is working in the Military Hospital, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India questioning the order passed by the said authority. 2. Mr.N.K.Vyas, learned Assistant Solicitor General appearing for the respondents would submit that the order passed by the competent authority in exercise of powers conferred under Section 19 (i) of the Act of 1950 is service matters falling within the meaning of 3(o) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (for short the Act of 2007 ) and therefore, remedy of the petitioner would be to file an application under Section 14(2) of the Act of 2007 before the Armed Forces Tribunal for redressal of his grievances and as such, by virtue of the provisions contained in Section 14(1) of the Act of 2007, ...
Vijay Jamnik Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Water Resou ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-05-2015
Order On Board 1. The neat question that emanates for consideration is whether the District Election Officer (Local Election) is empowered under Rule 27-A of the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Nirvachan Niyam, 1995 (for short 'the Niyam, 1995') to place officer(s) on deemed deputation under suspension and whether the officer assigned the duty in relation to an election (local) would be continued to be on such deemed deputation even after declaration of result of election? 2. The facts shorn of unnecessary details requisite to judge the correctness of the impugned order are as under: - 3. The petitioner at the relevant point of time was holding the substantive post of Assistant Engineer and was also officiating the post of Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division, Balrampur. By order dated 10-1-2015, the District Returning Officer (Local Election) / Collector passed an order appointing the petitioner as officer-in-charge for printing of ballot papers for Panchayat Local Elections, 2015 and ...
S.K. Shrivastava Vs. State Information Commissioner Chhattisgarh Offic ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-04-2015
Order On Board 1. The petitioner, a retired Deputy Director in the Department of Fisheries, having been retired on 31.7.2011, has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order passed by the Second Appellate Authority i.e. the State Information Commission under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (henceforth 'the Act') whereby the State Information Commission (for short 'the Commission') has imposed penalty of Rs.5,000/- and also directed to pay compensation of Rs.500/- to respondent No.4 together with all the required information. 2. Facts of the matter, briefly stated, are that respondent No.4, a social worker, moved an application under Section 6 of the Act seeking information in respect of one Fisheries Extension Worker (FEW) on 28.12.2010. The petitioner refused to provide the required information on the ground that the information sought for pertains to individual fisheries extension worker and no public interest is involved in pr...
Lakhan Bai Vs. Rambai and Others
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-03-2015
Order on Board 1. Shri Mahettar Lal while working as E.P. Fitter Grade-III in the South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Kusmunda Project, District Korba died on 8.12.1998 leaving behind his widow Smt.Lakhan Bai and other legal representatives. Upon death of Shri Mahettar Lal, Smt.Lakhan Bai as well as Rambai both filed an application before the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 1972 ) in Form-N claiming a sum of Rs.1,29,000/- as gratuity in respect of service rendered by Shri Mahettar Lal. 2. On a notice being issued, the respondent No.2/SECL filed its reply before the competent authority stating inter-alia that petitioner Lakhan Bai cannot be termed as widow of late Mahettar because name of respondent No.1 Rambai has been entered into in service record, therefore, the respondent No.1 is entitled for gratuity. 3. Both the petitioner and respondent No.1 adduced their evidence before the Controlling Authority. The controlling...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›