Chhattisgarh Court June 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/s. Beekey Hygiene Products Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board and ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jun-30-2014
1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the supplementary bill raised by the respondent / Board vide impugned memo dated 11/06/92 (Annexure P/1). The petitioner has also assailed the correctness and validity of notice of disconnection dated 24/06/93 (Annexure P/2). 2. Quintessential facts necessary for adjudication of the controversy involved in the writ petition are that the petitioner is an industrial consumer who was provided electricity connection by the respondent / Board. During the period of consumption of electricity for industrial use by the petitioner, an inspection was carried out by the authorities of the Board on 17/08/91 and the officers of the Board found the current transformer /potential transformer, defective and not giving correct recording of consumption. As the pleadings and documents placed on record goes to show, the respondent / Board intimated this fact to the petitioner and the petitioner vide his communication ...
Dwarika Prasad Dewangan Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jun-27-2014
1. Invoking revisional jurisdiction of this Court under Section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, petitioner herein has filed this criminal revision against the impugned order dated 19-5-2011 by which learned Additional Sessions Judge, Balod, District Durg framed charge for the offence punishable under Section 304, IPC. 2. The core facts required for judging the legality and correctness of the impugned order are as under:- 2.1 That the petitioner is a registered medical practitioner having passed Ayurved Ratna and practicing in alternative system of medicine administered injection to Lalita Bai aged about 30 years wife of Mahesh Kumar some time in the month of August, 2010. The said injection was administered in the Thai region, later on after 2-3 days Lalita Bai suffered pain in that place followed by swelling. The husband of Lalita Bai contacted petitioner and thereafter petitioner found formation of pus in that place, for which she was subjected to cut by the petition...
Chanda Tirkey Vs. Surajdev Sahu and Another
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jun-25-2014
1. Impugning the legality and correctness of order dated 22/07/2013, the instant revision has been filed by applicant/complainant, by which, non-applicant No. 1 has been discharged from offence under Section 3(2) (v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (in short Atrocities Act) finding no sufficient cause for proceeding with trial. 2. On 03/10/2012 a written complaint made by the applicant herein and the offence under Sections 3(2) (v) of the Atrocities Act, 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (in short IPC) was registered against the non-applicant No. 1. The copy of complaint (Annexure P-3) states that the applicant is working as A.N.M., in Primary Health Center, Umeshwarpur under non-applicant No. 1. The non-applicant No. 1 is working as Rural Medical Assistant. 3. It is the case of the complainant/applicant that on 23/11/2009 non-applicant No. 1 outraged her modesty and thereafter on 04/09/2011 committed rape with her. As she is a m...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›