Chhattisgarh Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramakant Dani Vs. Branch Manager, Bank of Baroda, Durg Branch and Anot ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Apr-09-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order, dated 11.06.2013 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum?), in Complaint Case No.211/2011, whereby the complaint of the appellant / complainant seeking compensation on account of loss to the crop, which was insured under National Agricultural Insurance Scheme, has been dismissed on the ground that as per declaration given by the appellant/complainant in the application form for obtaining agricultural credit limit, his land was irrigated and therefore no compensation was payable. 2. In nut shell, the facts of the case are that the appellant / complainant is a farmer of Village Motinpur, Tehsil Dhamdha, District Durg (C.G.) and he was having Kisan Credit Card and was enjoying credit facilities upto extent of Rs.3,00,000/- on the basis of that Kisan Credit Card. It is also not in dispute that as per National Agricultural Insurance Scheme, all persons, who have been grante...
Branch Manager, Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited and Another ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Apr-09-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 21.12.2012, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum") in Complaint Case No.68/2012. By the impugned order, the learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent/complainant and directed the appellants/OPs to pay within a month from the date of the order a sum of Rs.3,69,300/- (Rs.Three Lakhs Sixty Nine Thousand and Three Hundred Only) to the respondent/complainant, along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 05.06.2012 till date of payment. The District Forum has further directed the appellants/OPs to pay a sum of Rs.4,000/- as compensation for mental, physical agony and financial inconvenience and Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the respondent /complainant before the District Forum are : that the respondent/complainant purchased the Highwa Tru...
Mohammad Yusuf Raza Vs. Indore Transport Agency
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Apr-09-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 23.02.2013, passed District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum?) in Complaint Case No.357/2010. By the impugned order the learned District Forum, has dismissed the complaint of the appellant/complainant. 2. In nutshell, the facts of the case are that a Video Camera of Sony Company, valuing Rs.1,40,000/-, was booked by the appellant/complainant with the respondent/Transport Agency for its transport from Nagpur to Raipur, in the form of a parcel and requisite charges were paid by the appellant/complainant to the respondent/O.P. The allegation of the appellant/complainant against the respondent / O.P. was that the said parcel was not delivered at its destination and thus, deficiency in service has been committed by the respondent/O.P., so appellant/complainant, is entitled to get value of the article, along with other amount of compensation from the respondent/O.P. 3. The r...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Setimagrani and Another
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Apr-05-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal has been filed being aggrieved by the order dated 29.08.2012 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bilaspur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum"), in Complaint Case No.218/2009 "Smt. Smt. Seti Magrani Vs. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Through Divisional Manager and another". By the impugned order, the District Forum, allowed the complaint of the respondent No.1/complainant and directed the appellant/O.P.No.1 to pay sum of Rs.5,00,000/- to the respondent No.1/complainant along with interest @ 7% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint and also awarded Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation and to pay the same within two months from the date of order, otherwise, the aforesaid amount will be payable along with interest @ 9% p.a. 2. The facts of the complaint filed by the respondent No.1/complainant before the District Forum : are that the respondent No.1/complainant Smt. Seti Magrani is wife of Late Jang Bahadur Thapa, who wa...
Assistant Engineer (Rural) Vs. Kaushalya Patel and Others
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Apr-05-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 28.07.2012, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum") in Complaint Case No.54/2011, whereby the complaint, has been allowed by the District Forum and the learned District Forum, has directed the appellant/O.P. (i) to send electricity bill for the month of November, 2010 and January, 2011 on the basis of correct consumption, to which the respondents/complainants are responsible to pay (ii) the connection which was disconnected was to be reinstated/connected immediately after making payment by the respondents/complainants (iii) to pay a sum of Rs.4,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation to the respondents/complainants. 2. The facts of the complaint filed by the respondents/complainants before the District Forum, are : that the respondents/complainants obtained one domestic electric connection in their house from the a...
Harishankar Prasad Sahu and Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Apr-04-2014
P. Sam Koshy J. (1) By way of instant Criminal Revision, the applicants have challenged the judgement dated 4.1.2014 passed by Sessions Judge, Korba, in Criminal Appeal No.38/2013. (2) The applicants are aggrieved by the judgement dated 4.1.2014, to the extent of the Sessions Judge, while passing the impugned judgement after setting aside the judgement of conviction and order of sentence dated 25.6.2013 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Korba in Criminal Case No.1195/2010, has remitted back the matter for retrial after taking a fresh evidence of certain witnesses who were not cited as a witness by the prosecution either in the charge-sheet or at any point of time during the evidence before the trial Court. (3) Brief facts leading to the instant case are that in the year 2003, marriage of the complainant (Smt. Dhaneshwari Sahu) was solemnized with applicant No.1 (Harishankar Prasad Sahu). According to the complainant, immediately after about 2 years of marriage, applicant No.1 (husba...
Shamsher Singh Vs. Indian Potash Limited Company (i.P.L. Company) Thro ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Apr-02-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. The complainant Shamsher Singh, has filed this complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 seeking compensation of Rs.70,00,000/- for decrease in production on account of sale of adulterated and sub standard quality of white potash, Rs.12,00,550/- for loss suffered in Drip System, Rs.4,00,000/- towards compensation for mental agony along with interest @ 9% p.a. i.e. Rs.11,07,074/- totaling Rs.97,07,624/-. 2. The complaint of the complainant in brief is that : the complainant is an educated farmer. Agriculture is only source of his livelihood. The complainant is carrying agriculture activities with the help of his brother Jitendra Singh and other family members. The complainant has obtained 45 acres agricultural land on rent from Chawla Krishi Farm, Mandir Hasaud (Riko Road) and is carrying agriculture activities. O.P.No.1 is a company registered under Indian Companies Act, 1956 and it is manufacturer of white potash fertilizer, O.P.No.2 is...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›