Chhattisgarh Court April 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vikas Alias Pintu Keshari Vs. the State of Chhattisgarh, Through S.H.O ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Apr-25-2014
Sunil Kumar Sinha, J. (1) This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 24th of June, 2006 passed in Sessions Trial No. 355/2005 by the Tenth Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Bilaspur (C.G.). By the impugned judgment, the appellant has been convicted and sentenced in following manner with a direction to run the sentences concurrently:- ConvictionSentenceu/S 363 IPCR.I. for 7 years andfine of Rs.1,000/-, indefault R.I. for onemonthu/Ss 366 IPCR.I. for 10 years andfine of Rs.1,000/-, indefault R.I. for onemonthu/Ss 376 IPCR.I. for life and fine ofRs.2,000/- in defaultR.I. for one month (2) The facts, briefly stated, are as under:- 2.1 Prosecutrix (PW-13) was aged about 9 years. She was residing with her parents in Dayal Band (Nayapara), P.S. City Kotwali, Bilaspur. In the intervening night of 4th and 5th of August, 2005, prosecutrix (PW-13) and her parents, Amarnath (PW-1) and Ramsila Bai (PW-2) were sleeping in their house. Amarnath (PW-1), at about 2.00 a.m. found that the door o...
Triveni Bai and Others Vs. Golden Multi Service Club, G.T.F.S. Through ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Apr-23-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 18.11.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Mahasamund (C.G.), in Complaint Case No.04/2013. By the impugned order, learned District Forum has dismissed the complaint of the appellants (complainants). 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the appellants (complainant), before the District Forum are : that deceased Sakharam Sahu was husband of the appellant No.1 (complainant No.1) Smt. Triveni Bai and father of appellant Nos.2 to 4 (complainant Nos.2 to 4). Deceased Sakharam Sahu had purchased Group Janta Personal Accident Policy No.100300/47/01/9600022/01/96/30180 for the period from 01.09.2002 to 31.08.2017 from the respondent No.2 (O.P.No.2) National Insurance Company Limited and the insured amount is Rs.1,00,000/-. The appellant No.1 (complainant No.1) Smt. Triveni Bai was made nominee in the policy. On 28.05.2012, deceased Sakharam Sahu, was threatened by Yograj Sahu for payment o...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Dhanesh Kumar Sinha and Ano ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Apr-23-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 12.08.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum") in Complaint Case No.343/2012. By the impugned order, the learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent no.1 (complainant) and directed the appellant (O.P.No.1) to pay a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- as compensation to the respondent No.1 (complainant) along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint till date of payment. The District Forum has further directed the appellant (O.P.) to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- as compensation for mental agony and unfair trade practice and Rs.2,000/- as advocate fees and cost of litigation. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the respondent no.1 (complainant) before the District Forum are : that the respondent No.2 (O.P. No.2 Bank) had obtained Personal Accident Insurance Policy No.192502/48/2011/278 from the appellant (O.P.N...
Reliance General Insurance Company Limited and Another Vs. Satnam Sing ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Apr-23-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 10.09.2012, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum") in Complaint Case No.59/2011. By the impugned order, the learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent (complainant) and directed the appellants (OPs) to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-, which is repairing charges of the vehicle in question, to the respondent (complainant) within a month along with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of the order till date of payment. The District Forum has further directed the appellants (OPs) to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.2,000/- as cost of the litigation to the respondent (complainant). 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint filed before the District Forum are : that the respondent (complainant) is the registered owner of the vehicle bearing registration No.C.G.04-JB-5443. The said vehicle was insured with a...
indresh Kesharwani Vs. Magma Finance Corporation Limited
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Apr-23-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 30.04.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum") in Complaint Case No.122/2010. By the impugned order, learned District Forum, dismissed the complaint filed by the appellant (complainant). Hence this appeal. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the appellant (complainant) before the District Forum are : that the appellant (complainant) obtained finance facility of Rs.3,19,000/- from previous financer Shrachi Security Ltd. Jabalpur for purchase of a pick-up vehicle for the business purpose on 31.01.2005 and the rate of interest payable was 4% p.a. The subordinate office of the financier Shrachi Infrastructure Limited modified the interest rate 7.5% p.a. and dispute arose between the parties, but when the appellant (complainant) had not paid the installments, the agent made compromise and fixed rate of interest as 4.5% p.a. According to this compr...
Central Bank of India, Branch: Fafadih, Through Branch Manager Vs. Rek ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 26.04.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G) (henceforth œDistrict Forum?) in Complaint Case No.28/2012. By the impugned, the learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent (complainant) and directed the appellant (O.P.) to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-, which is the amount of cheque along, with interest @ 6% from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 01.02.2012 till the date of payment. The District Forum has further directed to the appellant/O.P. to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.3,000/- towards cost of litigation. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint filed by the respondent/complainant before the District Forum are : that the respondent/complainant and her husband namely Tulsi Patel having a joint saving bank account No.1261355823 in the appellant (O.P.) Central Bank of India, Branch Fafadih, Raipur....
Geeta Singh and Another Vs. the State of Chhattisgarh and Others
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
1. The main point involved in these two writ petitions is, 'Whether the word 'fu;fer' (regular) in sub-rule (1) of rule 4 {4(1)} of the Mahila Bahuuddeshiya Swasthya Karyakarta (ANM) Pathyakram Pravesh Niyam, 2011 (the Rules), is discriminatory.' THE FACTS 2. The State Government conducts 1 year Auxilliary Nursing and Midwifery course (the ANM-Course) for the appointment on the post of Multipurpose Health Worker, which includes ANM. The admission in the ANM-Course is governed by the Rules. 3. Rule 4(1) of the Rules provides minimum educational qualification for admission. It is as follows: œHINDI? WP 7934 of 2011 4. The Respondent published an advertisement for admission in the ANM-Course in the month of October, 2011 for the session 2011-2012. 5. Smt. Geeta Singh filed an application for admission in the ANM-Course. Her application was not entertained on the ground that she had passed 12th class privately and not as a regular student. She has filed Writ Petition (C)- 7934 of 201...
Pratap Shankar Shrivas Vs. the Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 23.04.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum") in Complaint Case No.30/2013. By the impugned order, the learned District Forum, has dismissed the complaint filed by the appellant (complainant). 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint filed before the District Forum are : that the appellant (complainant) is registered owner of vehicle bearing registration No.C.G. 13 “ L-1052, chassis no. M.A.T. 445056 B.V.G. 64025, Engine No. 2751D 106 G.Y.Y.S.D. 6148. The said vehicle was insured with the respondent (O.P.) for the period from 05.10.2011 to 04.10.2012 and the insurance policy No. is 193300 / 31/2012/7081. During the subsistence of insurance policy, the said vehicle was dashed by a motor cycle at Village Domhani, near Main Road, Bilaigarh, District Balodabazar in which the vehicle in question was damaged extensively. The appellant (complainant)...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Kanti Prasad and Others
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal has been filed being aggrieved by the order dated 29.04.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum"), in Complaint Case No.136/2011. By the impugned order, the District Forum, has allowed the complaint of the respondent Nos.1 to 5/complainants and directed the appellant/O.P.No.1 to pay sum of Rs.5,00,000/- to the respondent Nos.1 to 5/complainants along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint 14.09.2011 and also awarded Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation and advocate fee to the respondent Nos.1 to 5/complainants. 2. The facts of the complaint filed before the District Forum are : that Late Subran was father of the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and son of respondent No.4 and 5. Subran was an employee of S.E.C.L. and he was insured with appellant/O.P.No.1 through his employer O.P.No.2 and 3/S.E.C.L. The insurance was effective for the period from 16.10.1999 to 15.1...
Rohit Singh Thakur Vs. C.G. Rajya Beej Evam Krishi Vikas Nigam Limited ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 12.12.2012 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum?) in Complaint Case No.138/2012. By the impugned, the learned District Forum, has dismissed the complaint filed by the appellant/complainant. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the complaint filed before the District Forum are : that the appellant/complainant is owner of 2.241 hectare of land, near about 22.983 hectare land is recorded in the name of his father Gore Singh and near about 5.515 hectare of land is recorded in the name of his brother Venkat Singh and Lala Singh. All the land are situated at village Kenwtara, Patwari Halka No.12, Revenue Circle Saja, Tehsil and District Bemetara (C.G.). The respondent No.3/O.P.No.3 Deputy director Agriculture advised the appellant / complainant to cultivate soyabean crop instead of paddy crop. On being advised by the respondent No.3/O.P.No.3, the appellant/complainant ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »