Court : Chhattisgarh
Oral Order: (1) Heard. (2) By way of instant Transfer Petition, the petitioner has sought for transfer of Criminal Case No. 394 of 2012 from the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sitapur to any other Court situated in the same Sessions Division at Ambikapur. (3) Case in short is that respondent No. 2 “ the complainant has lodged a first information report before Sitapur Police Station District Surguja against the petitioner which was investigated upon by the Police Station and a case was registered as Crime No. 67 of 2012 against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the reason for seeking transfer of the said case from the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sitapur is that on 23.12.2011 when the petitioner had gone to the Court to mark his appearance in another criminal case i.e. Criminal Case No. 331 of 2010 some anti-social elements gathered in the Court premises, tried to as...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 21.10.2013, passed District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum?) in Complaint Case No.213/2012. By the impugned order the learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent/complainant and directed the appellant/O.P./Insurance Company to pay within a month a sum of , Rs.52,500/- to the respondent/complainant, along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 25.06.2012 till date of payment. The District Forum has further directed the appellant/O.P./Insurance Company to pay a sum of Rs.2,000/- towards compensation for mental agony and Rs.2,000/- towards Advocate Fees and cost of litigation to the respondent /complainant. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the respondent/complainant before the District Forum are : that the respondent/complainant is owner of vehicle Hero Honda Hunk bearing registration No.C.G.0...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 30.04.2013, passed District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum?) in Complaint Case No.49/2009. By the impugned order the learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent/complainant and directed the appellant/O.P. to pay within a month a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- to the respondent/complainant, along with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 14.11.2008 till date of payment. The District Forum has further directed the appellant/O.P. to pay a sum of Rs.25,000/-, which is the amount of lucky draw as well as Rs.30,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.2,000/- as advocate fees and cost of litigation to the respondent/complainant. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the respondent/complainant before the District Forum are : that the respondent/complainant had booked a Farm House in Saloni Farm House Scheme of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 14.01.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.133/2012, whereby the complaint of the respondent / complainant, has been allowed. 2. The appellants/OPs have preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 14.01.2013, passed by the District Forum and have also filed application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3. Shri Dron Tamrakar, learned counsel appearing for the appellants/OPs prayed for condoning the delay in filing the appeal on the basis of grounds mentioned in the application for condonation of delay filed by the appellants/OPs and he seeks an opportunity to argue the matter on merits. He placed reliance on N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy, AIR 1998 Supreme Court 3222; E.I.C.M. Exports Ltd. v. South Indian Corpn. (Agencies) Ltd. and Another [2011] 7 RCR (Civ) 32/[2009] 14 SCC 412 / [2009]...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 17.07.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum"), in Complaint Case No.170/2012. By the impugned order, the learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent No.1/complainant and directed the appellants/O.P.Nos.1 and 2 to pay sum of Rs.5,00,000/- which is sum insured under Group Janta Personal Accident Policy to the respondent No.1 / complainant, along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 26.11.2012. The District Forum, has further directed the appellants/O.P.Nos.1 and 2 to pay a sum of Rs.3,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.1,000/- as Advocate Fees to the respondent No.1/complainant. 2. The facts of the complaint filed by the respondent No.1/complainant before the District Forum are that : the husband of the respondent No.1/complainant namely Kailash Sharma, was a pe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 20.08.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum?) in Complaint Case No.CC/27/2012, whereby the complaint filed by the respondent No.1/complainant, has been partly allowed and the District Forum has directed the O.P. Nos.1, 3 and 4 to pay jointly and severally a sum of Rs.8,300/- to the respondent No.1/complainant within a period of 30 days from the date of order, along with interest @ 7.5% p.a. and to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- towards compensation for mental agony and Rs.5,000/- towards advocate fees and cost of litigation. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case, as per pleadings of the complainant are: that the respondent No.1/ complainant is an agriculturist by profession and is earning his livelihood by agricultural operation in his fields. The O.P.No.1, is the manufacturer of standard seeds, O.P.No.2 is an unit of certifying the sta...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 18.10.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum"), in Complaint Case No.199/2012. By the impugned order, the learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent Nos.1 and 2 / complainants and directed the OPs to pay a sum of Rs.3,50,000/- jointly and severally to the respondent Nos.1 and 2/ complainants as compensation, along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 12.06.2012 till date of payment. The District Forum, has further directed the OPs to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.2,000/- as Advocate Fees and cost of litigation to the complainants. 2. Brief facts of the case, as stated in the complaint filed by the respondent Nos.1 and 2/complainants before the District Forum are : that the respondent Nos.1 and 2 / complainants had taken a LPG gas connection for the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
1. By way of the present criminal revision the applicant has challenged the judgment dated 28.01.2004 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Balod, District Durg in Criminal Appeal No. 106/2000. 2. Facts leading to the instant case are that on 01.12.1990 a report was lodged by complainant Bharatram (PW-2) alleging that the present applicant who is the husband of her daughter Manbha Bai and his relatives are harassing, ill treating her daughter and also subjecting her to cruelty. Upon the said report, the Police registered a case against the applicant, his mother Parvat Bai and father Hariram for the offence punishable u/s 498A of IPC. After investigation, charge sheet was filed and the matter was put to trial before the A.C.J.M, Balod in Criminal Case No.1211/90. 3. After completion of trial, the trial Court vide its judgment dated 06.06.2000 reached to the conclusion that the applicant as well as his mother Parvat Bai are guilty of having committed the offence u/s 498A of IPC and upon c...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 02.05.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum") in Complaint Case No.CC/12/273. By the impugned order, the complaint filed by the respondent/complainant has been allowed and the appellants/Insurance Corporation, has been directed to pay within period of two months from the date of order the amount payable as accidental benefit under policy Nos.370473369, 384067139 and 385316764 and also pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- as compensation for mental agony along with interest @ 06% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 10/09/2012 and also pay a sum of Rs.2,000/-. If the aforesaid amount is not paid within the stipulated period, then the aforesaid amount would be payable along with interest 09% p.a. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the respondent/complainant before the District Forum are : that the during his life time, the husband of the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. The complainant has filed this complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the opposite parties for seeking direction to the opposite parties (a) to provide new J.C.B. Machine with original bill (b) to pay compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- for deficiency in service, unfair trade practice and for mental agony and to grant any other relief, which this Commission deems fit and just. 2. Brief facts of the complaint as per the complainant are : (1) that the O.P.No.1 is engaged in business of manufacturing engine and O.P.No.2 is engaged in business of manufacturing body and machine and O.P.No.3 is dealer of O.P.No.1 and 2 at Raipur from whom the complainant purchased J.C.B. Machine. The complainant purchased J.C.B. Machine J.S.80 for self employment for earning livelihood of himself and his family with the help of finance from O.P.No.3 and which is the only source of livelihood of the complainant and his family. The complainant purchased th...
Tag this Judgment!