Chhattisgarh Court February 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramkhilavan Sharma Vs. Ramkunwar Maheshwari
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Feb-12-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 17.12.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum"), in Execution Case No.47/2010 "Smt. Ramkunwar Maheshwari v. Om Grih Nirman Sahakari Samiti Maryadit, Raipur (C.G.)". By the impugned order, learned District Forum, has directed to issue non bailable warrant against the appellant herein. 2. Brief facts of the complaint filed by the respondent /complainant are : that the respondent/complainant became member of O.P./Om Grih Nirman Sahakari Samiti Maryadit. The appellant Ramkhilawan Sharma was president of that Housing Society at the relevant time. The respondent/complainant paid two instalments of Rs.2,500/- each on 29.04.1984 and 01.05.1984 towards allotment of plot but plot was not allotted in her favour. The respondent/complainant made repeated efforts and contacted the authorities for allotment of plot, but she was told that the layout was not approved ...
Paduman Singh Vs. Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Feb-07-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 08.03.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.153/2012, whereby the complaint of the appellant/ complainant, has been dismissed 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint case filed by the appellant/complainant before the District Forum are : that the appellant/complainant, is registered owner of the vehicle bearing registration No.C.G.13-C-8872. The said vehicle has been purchased by the complainant/appellant with the help of finance provided by the Finance Company. The said vehicle was insured with respondent/O.P. under Policy No.191600/31/11/01/00003547 for the period from 06.09.2011 to 05.09.2012. On 10.09.2011 the complainant/appellant himself was driving the vehicle in question and was going to village Marahi, District Siwan (Bihar). Near Wadrafnagar, the vehicle dashed against a tree and the complainant/appellan...
Gomti Patel Vs. Gopal Tractors Agency
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Feb-07-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 27.02.2013 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G) (henceforth called œDistrict Forum?) in Complaint Case No.102/2010, whereby the complaint filed by the complainant/appellant, has been dismissed by the District Forum. 2. The case of the complainant/appellant before District Forum was that the complainant/appellant purchased tractor bearing registration No.C.G.13-A-7028 and trolley bearing registration No.C.G.13-A-7029 from the O.P.No.1 after obtaining loan from O.P.No.3/Bank. The complainant/appellant had paid the entire cost of the tractor and trolley to the O.P.No.1 and 2, but on 07.06.2008, O.P.No.2, who is employee of O.P.No.1 illegally taken back the trolley bearing registration No.C.G.13-A-7029 by saying that amount has not been paid. On 06.01.2009 the complainant/appellant reported the matter to the Police Station, Sariya (C.G.), but Police had not taken any action. The comp...
Maksuda Begum Vs. Executive Engineer : West Zone, City Division âande ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Feb-07-2014
1. This appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has been filed by the complainant/appellant against the order passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bilaspur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum") on 20.02.2013 in Complaint Case No.117/2009, whereby the complaint of the appellant/complainant has been dismissed by the District Forum. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the complaint before the District Forum are that on the date of purchase of the house by the appellant/complainant, service connection no.033581 was operative for domestic use in the name of D.T. Shrivastava and on the date of purchase of the house, no dues was payable to the respondents/OPs, but after giving the said house on rent, Guardian and Guide School was started and thereafter domestic service connection, was converted into commercial service connection and billing was done as such. The appellant/complainant had regularly paid the electricity bills. In the said premises, a private ...
Branch Manager, Bank of Baroda Vs. Nagen Verman and Another
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Feb-07-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 21.11.2012 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surguja, Ambikapur (henceforth called "District Forum"), in complaint case no.54/2011. By the impugned order, learned District Forum allowed the complaint of the complainant and directed the appellant Bank to refund Rs.2,05,230/- to complainants / respondents along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of complaint till the date of payment. 2. Brief facts of the complaint case filed by the complainants / respondents are that the complainants/respondents purchased tractor Mahendra 275 D I Engine No. and Chasis No.RDT 8501 and trolley from Shastri Automobile, Ambikapur at the cost of Rs.4,79,285/-. The complainants/ respondents obtained loan from the appellant / OP Bank. Registration and insurance would be obtained by the appellant / OP Bank, but the appellant / OP Bank failed to obtain registration and insurance and committed deficiency in service. ...
National Insurance Company Limited, Through : Its Branch Manager Vs. H ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Feb-07-2014
1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 08.02.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Janjgir (C.G) (henceforth "District Forum") in Complaint Case No.09/2009. By the impugned order, learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent/complainant and directed the appellant/O.P. to pay a sum of Rs.60,000/- to the respondent/complainant within two months from the date of order, along with interest @ 7% p.a. from the date of repudiation of claim i.e. 14.03.2007 till date of payment, otherwise the aforesaid amount would be payable along with interest @ 9% p.a. The District Forum, has further directed the appellant/O.P. to pay a sum of Rs.1,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation to the respondent/complainant. 2. Brief stated the facts of the complaint filed before the District Forum are : that the respondent/complainant is owner of maruti van bearing registration No.M.H.31-H-8944 and the vehicle was i...
Sarabjeet Singh Vs. Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, Throug ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Feb-07-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 04.03.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum) in complaint case No.116/2012, whereby the complaint filed by the appellant / complainant, has been dismissed by the District Forum. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are : that the vehicle bearing registration No.C.G.04-J.A.3220 was insured by the respondents/OPs for the period from 01.06.2011 to 31.05.2012. The policy no. is 230371234000241. The said vehicle met with an accident on 06.07.2011 at about 12 noon in Punjupathra area. The appellant/complainant immediately intimated the respondents/OPs regarding the incident. On being received intimation regarding the incident, the respondents/complainant registered claim no.2111117726. In the accident, the vehicle in question completely damaged. The appellant/complainant incurred a sum of Rs.5,11,390/- on repairing of the vehicle. The appellant/co...
Lacchu Urf Laxminarayan Vs. Proprietor, Watch House
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Feb-06-2014
1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 24.06.2013 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.39/2013, whereby the complaint of the appellant / complainant, has been dismissed directing the appellant/complainant to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- as penalty, Rs.2,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation to the respondent/O.P. 2. The appellant/complainant has preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 24.06.2013, passed by the District Forum and also filed application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3. We have heard arguments of learned counsel for both the parties on the application for condonation of delay and have also perused the record of the District Forum. 4. In Revision Petition No.1616 of 2011 - National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shri P. Rangaswamy and anr., decided on 11.11.2013, Hon'ble National Commission held thus : "8. In ...
Prabhuvan Sidar Vs. the Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Feb-06-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 14.12.2012, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Janjgir Champa (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum" for short) in Complaint Case No.08/2011, whereby the complaint of the complainant/appellant, has been dismissed as barred by time. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case of the complainant/appellant before the District Forum are that the : complainant/appellant is registered owner of vehicle Bajaj Caliber 115 bearing registration No.C.G.-11-BA-2278. The said vehicle was insured with the O.P./Insurance Company for the period from 06.06.2005 to 05.06.2006 and Policy No. is 152404/31/303/2596/2006/10262. On 28.11.2005, the said vehicle was stolen by someone from Mudhpar Bazar, Manikpur, while it was in locked condition. The matter was reported to the concerned Police Station and First Information Report (FIR) was lodged. The complainant/appellant also intimated the O.P./Insurance Company regarding the ...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Ashok Kumar Goswami
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Feb-06-2014
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal has been filed being aggrieved by the order dated 31.12.2012 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Korba (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum"), in Complaint Case No.CC/12/15. By the impugned order, the District Forum, allowed the complaint of the complainant/respondent, in part, and directed the appellant/O.P./Insurance Company to pay sum of Rs.2,39,870/- to the complainant/respondent, which has been assessed by the Surveyor towards loss to the questioned vehicle, along with interest @ 7% p.a. within two months from the date of order, otherwise the aforesaid amount would be payable along with interest @ 9%. It has further been directed to the appellant/O.P./Insurance Company to pay a sum of Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation to the complainant/respondent. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case of the complainant/respondent before the District Forum are : that the complainant/appellant is registered owner of vehicle bearing registrat...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »