Chhattisgarh Court February 2014 Judgments

Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Lekhan Chand Sa ...

Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 19.12.2012, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum) in Complaint Case No.99/2012, whereby the complaint filed by the respondent / appellant, has been allowed and appellant/O.P. / Insurance Company, has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.40,538/- to the respondent/complainant within a month from the date of order along with interest @ 09% p.a. The District Forum has further directed the appellant/O.P./Insurance Company to pay Rs.1,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation to the respondent/complainant. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the complaint filed by the respondent/complainant before the District Forum are : that the vehicle bearing registration No.C.G.11-C.F.2798 was of the registered ownership of the respondent/complainant, Lekhan Chand Sahu, which was insured by the appellant/O.P/Insurance Company under policy No...

State Bank of India, Branch Ambikapur, Through : Chief Manager, State ...

Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 19.03.2013 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surguja, Ambikapur (henceforth called "District Forum"), in complaint case no.31/2007. By the impugned order, learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent no.1/ complainant against appellant/O.P.No.1 and directed the appellant/O.P.No.1 to pay a sum of Rs.2,75,700/- within a month from the date of order to the respondent No.1/complainant along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 09.03.2007 and also to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- towards compensation for physical and mental agony and inconvenience suffered by him and Rs.2,000/- as cost of litigation. 2. Brief facts of the complaint of the respondent no.1/complainant before the District Forum are : that the respondent No.1/complainant is registered owner of tractor bearing registration No.M.P.27-B/1378 and trolley bearing registration No.M.P....

Life Insurance Corporation of India, Through âandeuro;andldquo; Branc ...

Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 12.03.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum"), in Complaint Case No.58/2012. By the impugned order, the learned District Forum, has allowed the complaint of the respondent / complainant and directed the appellant/O.P./Insurance Corporation to pay a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- to the respondent/complainant along with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of order till date of payment, within a period of one month. The District Forum has further directed the appellant/O.P./Insurance Corporation to pay a sum of Rs.4,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation to the respondent/complainant. 2. The facts of the complaint of the respondent/ complainant before the District Forum are : that Late Kushdhwaj Nayak, who was husband of the respondent/complainant, had obtained an insurance policy from the appellant/O.P./Insurance Corporat...

Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 16.11.2012, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Janjgir (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum") in Complaint Case No.05/2007. By the impugned judgment, the learned District Forum, has dismissed the complaint filed by the appellant/complainant. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint filed by the appellant/complainant before the District Forum are : that the respondent/O.P. is a banking company. The appellant/complainant purchased an Escort tractor with trolley bearing registration No.C.G.10-A-1240. The appellant/complainant obtained loan from the respondent/O.P. Bank to the tune of Rs.2,25,000/-. As on the month of February, 2006, less than Rs.1,00,000/- was due against the appellant/complainant. The appellant/complainant wanted details regarding the loan account, but the respondent/O.P./Bank did not supply statement of account regarding the loan account and instalments paid by the appellant/comp...

i.C.i.C.i. Lombard General Insurance Company, Through : Legal Manager ...

Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 04.12.2012, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum) in Complaint Case No.285/2008, whereby the complaint filed by the respondent no.1/ complainant,, has been allowed and appellant/O.P.No.1/ Insurance Company, has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.16,91,949/- to the respondent No.1/complainant within a month from the date of order along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint till date of payment. The District Forum has further directed the appellant/O.P./Insurance Company to pay Rs.1,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation to the respondent No.1/complainant. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the respondent No.1/complainant before the District Forum are : that on 26.02.2008, the respondent No.1/complainant purchased vehicle Chevrolet Captiva bearing registration No.No.C.G.04-8656 f...

S.K. Sharma Vs. State of Chhattisgarh Through: Principal Secretary and ...

Court: Chhattisgarh

Sunil Kumar Sinha, J. (1) As an effect of coming into force the Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 (the Act 2000), the two successor States i.e. State of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh were formed with effect from the appointed day i.e. 1st of November, 2000. At the relevant time, the appellant was working as an Assistant Engineer in Public Works Department (PWD). In tentative allocation list the appellant, who was posted in Umariya, M.P., was allocated to the State of Chhattisgarh. He joined as Assistant Engineer in the Office of Chief Engineer, Raipur Chhattisgarh on 21.12.2000. The appellant, thereafter, made an application before the concern authority for reallocation/ transfer on mutual basis with Mr. U.S. Khare (proposed intervener herein) for finally allocating/ transferring him to the State of Madhya Pradesh. According to the appellant, the said application for allocation/transfer on mutual basis was withdrawn. However, in a final allocation list issued on 9.9.2002, the a...

Omprakash Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer

Court: Chhattisgarh

Sunil Kumar Sinha, J. (1) This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 19th of April, 2007 passed in Sessions Trial No. 230/06 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.). By the impugned judgment, the appellant has been convicted u/S 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.100/- with default sentence of S.I. for one month. (2) The facts, briefly stated, are as under:- 2.1 Deceased- Devsingh was grand-father-in-law (cousin) of Bangla Bai (PW-2). He was residing with her. He has commented on the meal prepared by Bangla Bai (PW-2). Bangla Bai, while taking bath in the river, was stating all this to the other ladies. The accused heard this. He abused Bangla Bai (PW-2) and assaulted her by a belt. Husband of Bangla Bai was also assaulted by him. Bangla Bai (PW-2), thereafter came to her house. The accused came there with a tabbal (farsa). Bangla Bai (PW-2) closed the door of her house. After sometime, Devsingh (deceased) came ...

United India Insurance Company Limited, Through : Divisional Manager, ...

Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 28.03.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum) in complaint case No.568/2011. By the impugned order, the filed by the respondent/complainant, has been allowed in part and the appellant/O.P./Insurance Company, has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.1,68,750/- to the respondent/complainant within one month from the date of order along with interest @ 6% p.a. from filing of the complaint i.e. 08.07.2011 till date of payment and also pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.2,000/- towards advocate fee and cost of litigation. 2. The case of the respondent/complainant before the District Forum, was that the respondent/complainant purchased a Tata Indigo L.S. (Tata) Model 2006 Car bearing registration No.C.G.05-C-2411 for his personal use. The said vehicle was insured with appellant /O.P./Insurance Company and Policy No.190500/31/10/...

iffco âandeuro;andldquo; Tokio General Insurance Company, Through : B ...

Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 17.12.2012 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum) in complaint case No.11/2011 whereby the complaint filed by the respondent no.1/ complainant has been allowed and appellant/O.P.No.1/Insurance Company has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.1,51,564/- to the respondent no.1/complainant within a period of one month from the date of order along with interest @ 09% p.a. from the date of order till date of payment and also to pay a sum of Rs.4,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the respondent no.1/complainant is owner of vehicle bearing registration No.C.G.-13-C-4912. The said vehicle was insured with the appellant/O.P. No.1 for the period from 06.08.2009 to 05.08.2010. On 26.10.2009 the said vehicle met with accident and damaged. The respondent no.1/complainant intim...

M/S. Bhagwati Trading Company and Another Vs. the Oriental Insurance C ...

Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

1. This order will govern disposal of Appeal No .FA/13/293 as well as Appeal No. FA/13/350, which have been preferred respectively by the complainant and O.P. of Complaint Case No.103/2012 against the order dated 23.03.2013 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum? for short), whereby the complaint filed by the complainant, has been allowed in part, and the District Forum has directed the O.P. to pay a sum of Rs.40,500/- along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 20.03.2012 till date of payment and also pay Rs.5,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.2,000/- as cost of litigation to the complainant. For the purpose of convenience, hereinafter in this order, the parties will be referred as per their original nomenclature in the complaint case. The original of this order be retained in the file of Appeal No.FA/13/293 and its copy be placed in the file of Appeal No. FA/13/350. 2. Briefly stated, ...