Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 21.05.2012, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum) in Complaint Case No.415/2010, whereby the complaint filed by the appellant/ complainant, has been dismissed. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the complaint of the appellant/complainant before the District Forum are : that the appellant/complainant is owner of Stone Crusher and he obtained Low Tension Electric Connection with Service No.470002/1000467748 from the respondents. On 01.09.2010 respondent No.3 sent a letter No.1055/2008-09 dated 06.08.2010 along with four additional bills amounting to Rs.480/-, Rs.12,894/-, Rs.11,042/- and Rs.5,799/- respectively to the appellant/complainant. The appellant/complainant on 03.09.2010 sent a letter of objection to the respondent no.3 and demanded calculation sheet and audit report and basis of the issuance of above bills. Respondent no.3 sent letter dated 08.09...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Oral Order: 1. By way of the instant revision, the applicants have challenged the order dated 3.6.13 passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Surguja (CG) in Sessions Trial No.109/12 whereby, the court below had framed charge against all the applicants for the offence punishable under Sections 304-B/34 IPC. 2. Case of the prosecution is that deceased Abha Sahu was the wife of applicant No.1 “ Vishwanath Sahu. Marriage between deceased Abha Sahu and applicant No.1 was solemnized on 27.4.09. Immediately after the marriage, the relationship between the husband and wife got strained on account of demand of dowry being raised by the applicants and his family members and for which the deceased was also harassed. On 5.1.12, applicant No.1 “ Vishwanath Sahu took deceased Abha Sahu along with their two children on motorcycle from village Uproda Podi to Lakhanpur. En route, it is alleged by the applicant No.1 that they met with an accident on account of which, deceased Abha Sahu ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This order will govern disposal of Appeal No .FA/13/263 as well as Appeal No. FA/13/266, which have been preferred respectively by the O.P.No.1 and 3 / Punjab National Bank and O.P.No.2 / Axis Bank of the Complaint Case No.29/2011 against the order dated 07.03.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum? for short), whereby the complaint filed by the complainants, has been allowed in part, and directed the O.P. No.1 and O.P.No.2 to pay a sum of Rs.1,000/- to the complainants, along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 27.10.2010 till date of payment, within a period of one month and also pay Rs.100/- per day as per Circular towards compensation from 07.11.2010 till date of payment as well as Rs.2,000/- as cost of litigation to the complainants. For the purpose of convenience, hereinafter in this order, the parties will be referred as per their original nomenclatur...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 07.05.2013 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Mahasamund (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum") in Complaint Case No.09/2013. By the impugned order, the complaint of the respondent/complainant, has been partly allowed by the District Forum and directed the respondents/OPs to pay a sum of Rs.1,54,000/- to the respondent/complainant along with interest @ 6% from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 07.05.2011 till date of payment, within a period of one month from the date of order. The District Forum, has further directed to pay Rs.5,000/- towards compensation for mental agony and Rs.3,000/- as cost of litigation. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the respondent/complainant before the District Forum are : that the shop of the respondent/complainant namely Jain Cosmetics, was insured by the appellant No.3 through appellant No.2 under Policy No.215034 / 48 /10 000030 for the period from...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 15.02.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum) in Complaint Case No.190/2010, whereby the complaint filed by the appellant/ complainant, has been partly allowed and respondent/O.P./ Insurance Company, has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.5,43,750/- to the appellant /complainant within a month from the date of order, along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 16.04.2010 till date of payment. The District Forum has further directed the respondent/O.P./Insurance Company to pay Rs.10,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.3,000/- as cost of litigation to the appellant/complainant. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the appellant/complainant before the District Forum are : that the appellant/complainant is registered owner of the vehicle bearing registration No.C.G.04-ZA-6938. The said vehicle was i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 15.05.2013 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum") in Complaint Case No.CC/12/366. By the impugned order, the complaint filed by the appellant/complainant, has been dismissed by the District Forum. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the appellant/complainant before the District Forum are that : on 23/11/1991, the appellant/complainant deposited a sum of Rs.6,812/- in the respondent/Bank in the name of his minor son Naman Bhatt under Laxmivarsha Jama Yojna. At that time respondent/Bank told the appellant/complainant that rate of interest is 13% p.a. and on the date of maturity i.e. 23.11.1994 the amount payable was Rs.9,999/-. On being asked by the respondent/Bank, that again rate of interest was 13% p.a. the appellant/complainant reinvested the amount for six years. The first maturity amount was Rs. 21,544/- and thereafter reinvestment of the above amount, the ma...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 22.12.2012, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum) in Complaint Case No.141/2012. By the impugned order, the complaint of the appellant/complainant, has been dismissed by the District Forum. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the appellant/complainant are : that the respondents/OPs are Directors of Wiro Research and Care Clinic. On 24.01.2011, Smt. Khemlata Sahu, who was wife of the appellant/complainant fell ill and she had taken to the hospital of the respondents/OPs. The appellant / complainant had taken Smt. Khemlata Sahu, on pursuance of advertisement published in daily newspaper. The respondents/OPs registered Smt. Khemlata Sahu, in their hospital and her registration No. was 068/11 and she was advised for blood test. The blood test was conducted in the hospital of the respondents/OPs. In the blood test report, it is mentioned that H...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 11.10.2012, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum") in Complaint Case No.C.C.12/20. By the impugned judgment, the learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint and directed the OPs to pay a sum of Rs.1,12,904/- within a month from the date of order, along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 24.01.2012 till date of payment to the complainant. It has further been directed to the O.P. to pay Rs.5,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.2,000/- as cost of litigation to the complainant. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint filed by the complainant before the District Forum are : that the complainant Rajendra Kumar Mishra purchased a second hand Maruti 800 Car, bearing registration Number C.G.04-B-7358 with the help of financial assistance provided by the OPs and loan of Rs.1,24,000/-, was sanctioned. The s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Sunil Kumar Sinha, J. 1. Appellant- Kumar Sai has been convicted under Sections 376(1) and 506 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 500/-, with default sentence of S.I. for one month; and S.I. for one year, respectively, with a direction to run the sentences concurrently. The judgment and findings have been recorded by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Rajnandgaon in S.T. No. 24/2008 on 08.07.2008. 2. The facts, briefly stated, are as under:- 2.1. The prosecutrix (PW-1) was a minor girl, aged about 14 years. She was studying in 7th standard. She was residing with her parents in village Pateli. The appellant is father of the prosecutrix (PW-1). On 01.12.2007, the mother of the prosecutrix (PW-1), namely, Ghasnin Bai (PW-7) was not present in the village, because she had gone to her brother's place. The allegations are that in the night, at about 9.30 pm, when the prosecutrix (PW-1) was sleeping in a room, the appellant came there, threatened her and...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
1. Cr.A.No.556/2009 filed on behalf of Mithun Gendre and Cr.A.No.766/2009 filed on behalf of Santosh Kumar and Raju Ratre against the common judgment dated 27-7-2009 passed by the 7th Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Durg in S.T. No.92/2008 are being disposed of by this common judgment. 2. By aforesaid two criminal appeals, the appellants namely Mithun Gendre, Santosh Kumar and Raju Ratre have challenged legality and propriety of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 27-7-2009 passed by the 7th Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Durg in S.T. No.92/2008, whereby and whereunder learned Additional Sessions Judge after holding the appellants guilty for causing homicidal death of Anil Sharma in sharing common intention and concealing the evidence of criminal case, convicted them under Sections 302 read with Section 34 and 201 of the IPC and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and pay fine of Rs.1,000/- each, in default of payment of fine to further suffer SI for six mon...
Tag this Judgment!