Court : Chhattisgarh
1. Petitioners father Shri Shyam Lal Dhruv working on the post of Assistant Gram Panchayat Officer, Gram Panchayat Gadamor, Janpad Panchayat Navagarh, District Durg, died in harness on 06/01/2007. Petitioner herein being son made an application in prescribed format on 12/03/2007 (Annexure P3) for grant of compassionate appointment to the Deputy Director, Panchayat and Social Welfare, District Durg (respondent No. 3 herein). The respondent No. 3 forwarded the said application to the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Navagarh, District Durg (respondent No. 6 herein) for necessary action. The respondent No. 6 sent all the documents to the respondent No. 3 and also sent the original papers to the Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Durg (respondent No. 5 herein) stating that since the salary of the deceased-Late Shri Shyam Lal Dhruv was drawn from the Office of the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Navagarh, District Durg, therefore, it is being sent to him as the serv...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
1. The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles, Act challenging the award dated 29.8.2011 passed by the 1st Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Raipur, District Raipur (CG) (for short 'the Tribunal') in Claim Case No.110/2010. By way of the said award, the Tribunal has rejected the claim application/compensation for the motor accident and the injury sustained by the appellant/claimant. 2. Brief facts leading to the instant appeal are that on 29.4.2009, the appellant/claimant, in the capacity of Conductor of a minibus bearing registration No.CG 04/E/0378 (for short 'the Bus') owned by respondent No.1 namely Mukesh Tiwari was traveling from Devbhog to Raipur and when they reached the main road, Amanaka, the Bus met with an accident as a result of which, the appellant/claimant is said to have received injuries particularly that of multiple fractures on both his legs. It is the case of the appellant/claimant that immediately after t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
1. Petitioner herein questions the legality and validity of the impugned transfer order dated 27/07/2013 (Annexure P/1), by which, the petitioner has been transferred from the post of Assistant Chief Election Officer State Election Commission, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) to Deputy Collector, Bijapur (Chhattisgarh). 2. The petitioner is holding substantive post of Deputy Collector. The petitioner was working as a Deputy Collector, Durg by order dated 09/09/2011, he was transferred and posted as Assistant Chief Election Officer Raipur, Chhattisgarh against the post of Deputy Chief Election Officer. Thereafter, by order impugned, he was transferred as Deputy Collector, Bijapur. He made a representation to the State Government on 29/07/2013 against his order of transfer. His representation was considered and came to be rejected on 22/08/2013 holding that he has been transferred after discussion and consent of Chief Electoral Officer, Chhattisgarh. 3. The petitioner herein has filed this writ pet...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
(1) The seminal question involved in this writ petition is whether the 3rd respondent Collector, Koria is empowered under Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Classification Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966 (henceforth Rules, 1966) to place the petitioner under suspension and to institute departmental enquiry against him. (2) The required facts, necessary for disposal of the writ petition in nutshell, are as under:- (2.1) The petitioner is a Sub Engineer working in the office of Executive Engineer, Rural Engineering Services Division, Baikunthpur, District Korea. (2.2) The State of Chhattisgarh by its order dated 16.12.2002 vide Annexure P/5 sent the petitioner on deputation to the Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, thereafter, the Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, by its order dated 24.12.2002 (Annexure P-6) posted him as Sub Engineer at Janpad Panchayat, Manendragarh, District Koria. (2.3) Third respondent Collector, Koria, by its order dated 27.02.2003 vide (Annexu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Heard learned counsel for the parties. 1. This revision application has been preferred by the applicant (since deceased) challenging his conviction under Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'the IPC') and sentence of RI for 3 months and fine of Rs.500/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo SI for one month. 2. In course of hearing of this revision application on 10-4-2013 the applicant's counsel informed the Court that the applicant has died. A report was called for to ascertain the fact of death of the applicant. The concerned Station House Officer submitted a report along with the death certificate of the applicant to the effect that the applicant Suresh Tiwari has died on 19-3-2010. 3. On 18-10-2013 learned counsel for the applicant prayed for time to bring the legal heirs of the deceased applicant on record, however, no such application has been filed. 4. When the matter was called for hearing today, learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the l...
Tag this Judgment!