Chhattisgarh Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tata Motors Finance Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Rama Shankar Yadav and Others
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-07-2014
Oral (Order) 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 29.01.2013 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.80/2010 whereby the complaint of the respondent no.1/ complainant, has been partly allowed. 2. The appellant/O.P.No.1 has preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 29.01.2013, passed by the District Forum and also filed application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3. We have heard arguments of learned counsel for the appellant on the application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay and have also perused the record of the District Forum. 4. In Revision Petition No.1616 of 2011 - National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shri P. Rangaswamy and anr., decided on 11.11.2013, Hon'ble National Commission held thus : "8. In Ram Lal and others Vs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd., AIR 1962 Supreme Court 361, it has ...
Branch Manager, the Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Savita Devi ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-06-2014
Oral (Order) 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 19.03.2013 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.143/2012 whereby the complaint of the respondent / complainant, has been partly allowed. 2. The appellant/O.P. has preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 19.03.2013, passed by the District Forum and also filed application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3. We have heard arguments of learned counsel for the appellant on the application for condonation of delay. 4. In Revision Petition No.1616 of 2011 - National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shri P. Rangaswamy and anr., decided on 11.11.2013, Hon'ble National Commission held thus : "8. In Ram Lal and others Vs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd., AIR 1962 Supreme Court 361, it has been observed :- It is, however, necessary to emphasize that even after sufficient cause has been shown a party is not entitled to the condonati...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Ashok Kumar Singh
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-04-2014
(Order) R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 25.10.2011 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.), (henceforth "District Forum"), passed in Complaint Case No.105/2010. By the impugned order the complaint of the complainant/respondent, has been partly allowed and the District Forum, has directed the appellant/O.P./Insurance Company to pay a sum of Rs.1,73,202/- along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 06.08.2010 till realisation and also to pay Rs.5,000/- as compensation for financial loss, mental and physical agony and Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation. 2. In brief, the facts of the complaint case are that the respondent/complainant is registered owner of Tata J.D. Machine (Loader), bearing registration No.C.G.15-A-6972. The said vehicle was insured with the appellant/Insurance Company and the appellant/Insurance Company received sum of Rs.15,980/- from the complainant/respondent as p...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Shyamkali and Another
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-04-2014
(Order) R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 07.08.2012 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bilaspur (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.220/2009, whereby the complaint of the respondent No.1/ complainant, has been allowed. 2. The appellant/O.P.No.1 has preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 07.08.2012 passed by the District Forum and also filed application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3. We have heard arguments of learned counsel for both the parties on the application for condonation of delay and have also perused the record of the District Forum. 4. In Revision Petition No.1616 of 2011 - National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shri P. Rangaswamy and anr, decided on 11.11.2013, Hon'ble National Commission held thus ; "8. In Ram Lal and others Vs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd., AIR 1962 Supreme Court 361, it has been observed :- It is, however, necessary to emphasize that even after suffi...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Chanmati @ Chandmukhi and A ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-04-2014
(Order) R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 05.01.2013 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bilaspur (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.136/2010, whereby the complaint of the respondent No.1/ complainant, has been allowed. 2. The appellant/O.P.No.1 has preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 05.01.2013 passed by the District Forum and also filed application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3. We have heard arguments of learned counsel for both the parties on the application for condonation of delay and have also perused the record of the District Forum. 4. In Revision Petition No.1616 of 2011 - National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shri P. Rangaswamy and anr, decided on 11.11.2013, Hon'ble National Commission held thus : "8. In Ram Lal and others Vs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd., AIR 1962 Supreme Court 361, it has been observed :- It is, however, necessary to emphasize that even after suffi...
Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. Ajay Ti ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-03-2014
1. This appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 has been filed by the OPs/appellants against the order passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum?) on 9.11.2012 in Complaint Case No. 34/2012, whereby the complaint of the complainant/respondent, has been allowed in part and District Forum has cancelled the electricity bill issued for the month of January, 2012 being erroneous. The OPs/appellants have been directed : (i) to provide revised electricity bill for electricity connection service No. 52-86-71-02-000732 on the basis of average meter reading prior to two years from February, 2012 within a month, (ii) to pay compensation of Rs. 2,000 for physical and mental agony, (iii) to pay Rs. 1,000 as cost of litigation to the complainant/respondent. The complainant/respondent, has been directed to pay the revised electric bill within 15 days of providing electric bill by the appellants and the ap...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›