Chhattisgarh Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chandrama Vs. Divisional Manager, the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd, and ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-10-2014
Oral (Order) 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 23.08.2012 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Baikunthpur, District Korea (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.01/2012, whereby the complaint of the appellant / complainant, has been dismissed. 2. The appellant/complainant has preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 23.08.2012, passed by the District Forum and also filed application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3. We have heard arguments of learned counsel for all the parties on the application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of delay and have also perused the record of the District Forum. 4. In Revision Petition No.1616 of 2011 - National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shri P. Rangaswamy and anr., decided on 11.11.2013, Hon'ble National Commission held thus : "8. In Ram Lal and others Vs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd., AIR 1962 Supreme Cour...
Arun Kumar Singh and Others Manager, Sahara City Homes Marketing and S ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-10-2014
(Order) R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This order will govern disposal of Appeal No.FA/13/294 as well as Appeal No.FA/13/307, which have been preferred respectively by the complainant and OPs of Complaint Case No.35/2012 against the order dated 30.03.2012 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum?), whereby the complaint filed by the complainant has been allowed and OPs have been directed to pay a sum of Rs.2,27,926/- to the complainant within two months from the date of order along with interest @ 12% w.e.f. 27.04.2005 till date of payment and also to pay Rs.5,000/- towards compensation for mental agony and Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation. It is further directed that if the OPs will not pay the aforesaid amount to the complainant within two months from the date of the order, the said amount is payable along with interest @ 18% p.a. For the purpose of convenience, hereinafter in this order, the parties will be referred as pe...
Executive Engineer and Another Vs. Yogendra Prasad Agrawal
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-09-2014
(Order) R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 30.04.2012 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Rajnandgaon (henceforth referred to "District Forum") in complaint case no.66/2010, whereby the appellants / OPs have been jointly and severally directed that the amount of Rs.60,662/-, which was paid by the complainant / respondent be adjusted from the bill of month of June and July, 2010 on the basis of previous 5 months' average bill and after adjustment, if any amount is refundable, balance amount be returned to the respondent with interest @ 6% p.a. and also awarded Rs.2,000/- towards advocate fee and cost of litigation within a period of two months from the date of order. If the amount is not paid by the OPs within the stipulated period, the same will carry interest @ 6% p.a. 2. The case of the respondent / complainant before the District Forum, are that the complainant / respondent obtained three electric connections in his premises and ser...
Harmit Singh Vs. C.G.S.P.D.C.L., Dangania, Raipur and Another
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-09-2014
(Order) R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 28.12.2011 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum") in Complaint Case No.271/2011, whereby the complaint of the appellant / complainant has been dismissed. Feeling aggrieved by that order, this appeal has been filed by the complainant. 2. The case of the complainant before the District Forum in brief are that an electricity connection was installed at the residence of the complainant / appellant in his father's name, Shri Rawel Singh bearing Service no. 100231853/37473068-01-040687. According to electric consumption, electricity bill has been regularly deposited per month by the complainant. The employee of the OPs, Electricity Board comes every month for recording meter reading and the electric meter has been shown O.K. every month, which proves that the electric meter is in fine condition. Electric meter has been inspected by the employee and officers of ...
Koushalya Fatnani Vs. Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Co. Ltd,
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-09-2014
(Order) R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 13.10.2011 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth called "District Forum") in Complaint Case No.CC/09/64, whereby the complaint of the appellant / complainant, has been dismissed on the ground that the complaint was barred by limitation and the complainant does not come in the category of consumer. Feeling aggrieved by that order, this appeal has been filed by the complainant. 2. The case of the complainant before the District Forum in brief are that the complainant Koushalya Fatnani is resident of near Ram Mandir, Shanti Nagar, Raipur and she was having a Grinding Unit namely Vinayak Pisai Udyog at Shanti Nagar, Raipur. She had obtained electric connection bearing No.143151 for running that Unit from the OP Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board (henceforth called "Electricity Board") and a meter was installed. The grievance of the complainant before the District Forum, w...
The Divisional Manager and Others Vs. Rajkumar Soni
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-09-2014
Oral (Order) 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 25.02.2013 passed District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.1014/2011, whereby the complaint of the respondent / complainant, has been partly allowed. 2. The appellants/OPs have preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 25.02.2013, passed by the District Forum and also filed application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3. We have heard learned counsel for both the parties on the application for condonation of delay and have also perused the record of the District Forum. 4. In Revision Petition No.1616 of 2011 - National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shri P. Rangaswamy and anr., decided on 11.11.2013, Hon'ble National Commission held thus : "8. In Ram Lal and others Vs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd., AIR 1962 Supreme Court 361, it has been observed :- It is, however, necessary to emphasize that even after sufficient cause has been shown ...
Ramlal Vs. Chairman, Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Co. Ltd., a ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-08-2014
(Order) R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 08.04.2013 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Mahasamund (C.G.) (henceforth called "District Forum") in Complaint Case No.31/2011, whereby the complaint of the appellant / complainant has been dismissed. Feeling aggrieved by that order, this appeal has been filed by the complainant. 2. The facts of the case of the complainant before the District Forum in brief are that the complainant is resident of Lohrin Dongari and he had agricultural land at that village. The complainant/appellant had obtained electric connection of 5 HP for operating motor pump from the respondents/OPs on 11.08.1997. He paid was paying the electricity bill regularly. Due to shortage of water, the complainant/appellant moved an application before the OPs/respondents for reducing the concerned load from 5 HP to 3 HP, but the OPs did not respond the same, therefore, the complainant moved applications before the OPs on 09.12...
i.C.i.C.i. Prudential Life Insurance Co. Ltd, and Another Vs. Rekha Ra ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-08-2014
Oral (Order) 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 28.12.2011 passed District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.59/2011 whereby the complaint of the respondent / complainant, has been allowed. 2. The appellant/O.P. has preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 28.12.2011, passed by the District Forum and also filed application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3. We have heard learned counsel for both the parties on the application for condonation of delay and have also perused the record of the District Forum. 4. In Revision Petition No.1616 of 2011 - National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shri P. Rangaswamy and anr., decided on 11.11.2013, Hon'ble National Commission held thus : "8. In Ram Lal and others Vs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd., AIR 1962 Supreme Court 361, it has been observed :- It is, however, necessary to emphasize that even after sufficient cause has been shown a part...
Amit Agrawal Vs. Branch Manager, the Oriental Insurance Company Limite ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-07-2014
Oral (Order) 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 19.09.2013 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Jashpur, District Jashpur (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.19/2012 whereby the complaint of the respondent / complainant, has been partly allowed. 2. The appellant/complainant has preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 19.09.2013, passed by the District Forum and also filed application under Section 15(1) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3. We have heard arguments of learned counsel for the appellant on the application filed under Section 15(1) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for condonation of delay and have also perused the record of the District Forum. 4. In Revision Petition No.1616 of 2011 - National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shri P. Rangaswamy and anr., decided on 11.11.2013, Hon'ble National Commission held thus : "8. In Ram Lal and others Vs. Rewa Coalfiel...
Shiv Prasad Sahu Vs. Branch Manager, Shriram Transport Finance Company ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-07-2014
Oral (Order) 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 15.04.2013 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kabirdham (Kawardha) (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum"), in Complaint Case No.39/2012. By the impugned order the complaint of the complainant/appellant has been dismissed with a direction that the complainant/appellant may file civil suit before the competent Civil Court. 2. The facts of the case of the complainant/appellant before the District Forum, briefly stated, are as under :- 2.1 The complainant/appellant is resident of Village Manikchauri, Police Station Pipariya, Tehsil and District Kabirdham (Kawardha) (C.G.) and he is an agriculturist by profession. The O.P. / respondent is a transport company and used to give loan for purchase of vehicles and also used to carry business of banking. The complainant/appellant purchased Mahindra Tractor 275 bearing registration No.C.G.04-DB-7539 along with trolley in the year 2007 at the price of Rs.5,00,000/-. The...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »