Chhattisgarh Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashish Automobiles and Another Vs. Lalit Kumar Singh and Another
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-25-2014
Oral (Order) 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 17.06.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.23/2013, whereby the complaint of the appellant/complainant, has been partly allowed. 2. The appellants/O.P.No.1 and O.P.No.2 have preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 17.06.2013, passed by the District Forum and also filed application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3. We have heard arguments of Shri Barun Chakrabotry, learned counsel for appellants on the application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, for condonation of delay and have also perused the record of the District Forum. 4. In Revision Petition No.1616 of 2011 - National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shri P. Rangaswamy and anr., decided on 11.11.2013, Hon'ble National Commission held thus : "8. In Ram Lal and others Vs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd., AIR 19...
Shivam Motors Private Limited and Another Vs. Vashista Tiwari and Anot ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
Oral (Order) 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 07.01.2013 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.107/2010, whereby the complaint of the respondent No.1 / complainant, has been allowed. 2. The appellants/O.P.No.1 and O.P.No.2 have preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 07.01.2013 passed by the District Forum and also filed application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3. We have heard arguments of learned counsel for appellants on the application filed for condonation of delay and have also perused the record of the District Forum. 4. In Revision Petition No.1616 of 2011 - National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shri P. Rangaswamy and anr., decided on 11.11.2013, Hon'ble National Commission held thus : "8. In Ram Lal and others Vs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd., AIR 1962 Supreme Court 361, it has been observed :- It is, however, necessary to emphasize that even aft...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Urmila and Another
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
Oral (Order) 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 07.06.2012, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bilaspur (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.307/2009, whereby the complaint of the respondent No.1/ complainant, has been allowed. 2. The appellant/O.P.No.1 has preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 07.06.2012 passed by the District Forum and also filed application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3. We have heard arguments of learned counsel for both the parties on the application for condonation of delay and have also perused the record of the District Forum. 4. In Revision Petition No.1616 of 2011 - National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shri P. Rangaswamy and anr, decided on 11.11.2013, Hon'ble National Commission held thus : "8. In Ram Lal and others Vs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd., AIR 1962 Supreme Court 361, it has been observed :- It is, however, necessary to emphasize that even after sufficient cause...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Arjun and Another
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
(Order) R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 02.02.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bilaspur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum" for short) in Complaint Case No.72/2009. By the impugned order the complaint of the complainant/respondent no.1 has been allowed by the District Forum and O.P.No.1/appellant, has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- as compensation to the complainant/respondent no.1. along with interest @ 7% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 04.04.2009 till date of order within a period of two month further directed that if the appellant/Insurance Company fails to pay the said amount within two months from the date of order, then it will be liable to pay interest @ 9% p.a. The District Forum also awarded a sum of Rs.1,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation in favour of the complainant/respondent no.1. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case of the complai...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Vs. Vedmati Kashyap and Anothe ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
Oral (Order) 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 07.05.2012 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bilaspur (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.12/2010, whereby the complaint of the respondent No.1/ complainant, has been allowed. 2. The appellant/O.P.No.1 has preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 07.05.2012 passed by the District Forum and also filed application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3. We have heard arguments of learned counsel for the parties on the application for condonation of delay and have also perused the record of the District Forum. 4. In Revision Petition No.1616 of 2011 - National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shri P. Rangaswamy and anr, decided on 11.11.2013, Hon'ble National Commission held thus : "8. In Ram Lal and others Vs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd., AIR 1962 Supreme Court 361, it has been observed :- It is, however, necessary to emphasize that even after sufficient cause has ...
Ashish Agrawal Vs. Manager, Indusind Bank Limited and Another
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
(Order) R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 02.07.2012, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum") in Complaint Case No.12/2011. By the impugned order the complaint of the complainant/appellant, has been dismissed by the District Forum. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case of the complainant/appellant before the District Forum are as under:- 3. That the complainant/appellant is owner of a vehicle Tata 2515 bearing registration No.C.G.-13-D-3020. He purchased the said vehicle on the basis of re-finance facility on 02.12.2009 from the OPs/respondents and Hire Purchase Agreement No. P.Q.001750 H was executed between the complainant/appellant and OPs/respondents, which was effective till 07.10.2012. The complainant / appellant got the vehicle insured and according to the agreement, the next insurance was to be obtained by the OPs/respondents and OPs/respondents collected the premium amount from th...
Raipur Raigarh Transport Vs. Ram Cloth Stores, Manager and Another
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
Oral (Order) 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 06.10.2012 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raigarh (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.75/2011, whereby the complaint of the respondent No.1 / complainant, has been allowed. 2. The appellant/O.P.No.1 has preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 06.10.2012, passed by the District Forum and also filed application under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3. We have heard arguments of learned counsel for both the parties on the application filed under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for condonation of delay and have also perused the record of the District Forum. 4. In Revision Petition No.1616 of 2011 - National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shri P. Rangaswamy and anr., decided on 11.11.2013, Hon'ble National Commission held thus : "8. In Ram Lal and others Vs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd., AIR 1962 ...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Vs. Ashok Kumar Tiwari
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
(Order) R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 05.11.2012, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bilaspur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum"), in Complaint Case No.147/2011. By the impugned order, the District Forum has allowed the complaint of the complainant/respondent and directed the O.P./appellant (Insurance Company) to pay a sum of Rs.6,72,447.90 to the complainant/respondent within a period of two months from the date of order, otherwise the aforesaid amount would be payable along with interest @ 7% p.a. The District Forum further awarded the complainant a sum of Rs.5,000/- towards compensation for mental agony and Rs.1,000/- towards cost of litigation. 2. The facts of the complaint case filed by the complainant/respondent before the District Forum are as under :- 3. The complainant/respondent, is carrying transport business and he is owner of one Highwa Truck bearing registration No.C.G.10-C-2848 and he purchased the vehicle ...
Vijay Kumar Lahimor Vs. Manager, the Oriental Insurance Company Limite ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-24-2014
(Order) R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 14.12.2012, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Janjgir Champa (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum" for short) in Complaint Case No.07/2011, whereby the complaint of the complainant/appellant, has been dismissed. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case of the complainant/appellant before the District Forum are that the complainant/appellant is registered owner of vehicle Bajaj C.T. 100 bearing registration No.C.G.-11-BA-3455. The said vehicle was insured with the O.P/Insurance Company for the period from 04.07.2005 to 03.07.2006 and Policy No. is 152404/303/2556/31/2006/10337. On 27.06.2006, Syed Abdul Abid, who is friend of the complainant/appellant took the said vehicle and parked it near Peela Mahal, in front of Vicky Electronics shop. Syed Abdul Abid came out of shop at about 7.30 P.M., then he found that the vehicle was not parked where he parked the vehicle and some unknown person had...
National Seeds Corporation Limited, Beej Bhawan, Pusa Parisar and Anot ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Jan-23-2014
(Order) R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This order will govern disposal of appeal No.FA/12/767 as well as Appeal No.FA/12/774, which have been preferred respectively by O.P. No.4 and O.P.No.3 of the Complaint Case No.27/2011, decided by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kabirdham (Kawardha) (C.G.) vide order dated 23.11.2012, whereby the District Forum allowed the complaint filed by the complainant against O.P.Nos.3 and 4 and directed both the appellants/O.P.Nos.3 and 4 to pay the complainant cost of 48 Quintals of paddy, as notified by the Government of Chhattisgarh for procurement of the aforesaid crop, within two months from the date of order, along with interest @ 6% p.a., with further direction that in case of failure of payment of aforesaid amount, the amount will carry interest @ 9% p.a. It has also been directed that the amount would first be payable by O.P.No.3 of the complaint case and in case of its failure to pay the amount, the aforesaid amount will be payable by O.P....
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »