Chhattisgarh Court March 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shivshankar Chandrawanshi Vs. Branch Manager, State Bank of India Kabi ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
Veena Misra, Member 1. The appeal in hand has been preferred by dissatisfied consumer against order dated 03.02.2012 in Complaint Case No.13/2011, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kabirdham /Kawardha (C.G.) (hereinafter referred to District Forum for short) whereby the complaint was only partly allowed and OP no.1 was directed to pay Rs.20,338/to the complainant within 2 months of the date of order towards compensation for loss of crop with interest @ 6 % per annum from the date of complaint and in case of default within the stipulated period, interest @ 9% would be payable from the date of order. 2. Brief facts necessary for disposal of this appeal are that the complainant is owner of agricultural land and had obtained Kisan Credit Card for obtaining loan for agricultural purpose. Credit limit was Rs.2,00,000/(Two Lacs) and his account no. was 30381009302. The complainant had obtained loan of Rs.1,75,000/from OP no.1 on 20.04.2009 under the Kisan Credit Card for K...
Mahaprabandhak, Rice Bran Oil Mill Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Oth ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Mar-13-2013
Satish K. Agnihotri, J. 1. By this Petition, the Petitioner challenges the legality and validity of the Order dated 5.4.1989 (Annexure P/9) passed by the Industrial Court, Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore, whereby the preliminary objection raised by the Petitioner with regard to jurisdiction of the Tribunal, was rejected. The Petitioner further challenges the legality and validity of the Order dated 28.9.1992 (Annexure P/11) passed by the Industrial Court, Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Indore, whereby the Petitioner was directed to regularize the services of the members of the Respondent No.2/Union and to grant service benefits viz. salary, gratuity, pension, leave, etc. Shri Sharma, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the Respondent No.2 filed a claim Petition before the Industrial Court, for regularization of their services. On receipt of notice from the Industrial Court, the Petitioner filed its reply stating that the Respondent No.2 was not recognized Union. A preli...
State of Tripura and Others Vs. Raju Ghosh and Others
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Mar-02-2013
Shah, J. 1. These appeals, namely WA no.23/2012, WA 32/2012 and WA 33/2012 are directed against the common judgment and order passed by the learned single Judge in WP(C) 195 of 2010 and WP(C) 440 of 2010, wherein while the learned single Judge allowed the writ petitions of the respondents in WA 23/2012 and WA 32/2012 who were petitioners in the aforesaid writ petitions, with the following directions: i. Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) is directed to first consider promotion of the writ petitioners to WP(C) 195 and 440 of 2010, to fill the vacancies of TPS Grade-II Officers; ii. DPC shall consider the case of the private respondents in the second round; and iii. Relaxation given by the Government under notification dated 9th March, 2010 shall be confined to only the 51 (fifty-one) posts of TPS Grade-II Officers and that too after first considering eligible officers on the basis of merit prescribed in Rule 14 of TPS Rules, i.e. prior to relaxation notification; iv. The relaxation ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›