Chhattisgarh Court February 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tulsi Das and Others Vs. Bindurbai Died and Deleted and Another
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Feb-02-2012
(SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CPC) 1. By this second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short `CPC'), the appellants have challenged the legality and propriety of the judgment and decree dated 23.1.96 passed by the Third Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Durg, in Civil Appeal No.8A/95, affirming the judgment and decree of decreeing the suit for eviction of the appellants dated 30.1.1995 passed by the Sixth Civil Judge Class-II, Durg, in Civil Suit No.26-A/91. 2. The present second appeal has been admitted for consideration on 18.4.96 on the following substantial questions of law:- "1. Whether in view of reported decision given in Mohd.Azeem v. District Judge, Aligarh and others (AIR 1985 S.C.1118), the appellant No.2 was liable to vacate from the suit house? 2. Whether in view of the fact that the respondent has not pleaded specifically that the accommodation acquired by the appellant No.1 is suitable for residence of the appella...
B.K. Lala Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Feb-02-2012
{Writ petition under Articles 226 read with 227 of the Constitution of India} 1. By this writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged legality and propriety of the order dated 12-12-2011 passed by the Sessions Judge, Dantewada in Bail Application No.109/2011 affirming the order dated 9-12-2011 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dantewada in remand case, whereby the application filed under Section 43D of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (for short `the Act of 1967') has been allowed and the period of limitation for filing charge sheet provided under Section 167 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short `the Code'), has been extended to 180 days. 2. As per both the orders impugned, copies of other applications and documents, the petitioner herein was arrested on 9-9-2011 in connection with Crime No.26/2011 registered at Police Station Kuakonda for the offence punishable under Sections 121, 124A, 120...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›