Chhattisgarh Court November 2012 Judgments
Shilpa Singh Rajput Vs. Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical Univer ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION C No 742 of 2012 Shilpa Singh Rajput ...Petitioners VERSUS Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical University & Others ...Respondents ! Shri Ali Asgar Advocate for the petitioner ^ Shri Anumeh Shrivastava Advocate for the responent No 1 and 2 Shri V V S Moorthy Deputy Advocate General for the State resp CORAM: Honble Shri Satish K Agnihotri J Dated:29. 11/2012 : Judgement ORDER (Delivered on 29th day of November, 2012) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to recheck the answer sheet booklet of the petitioner and to prepare a new mark-sheet for the said subject. Further, to direct the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to appear in the IVth semester examination of Masters in Business Administration (for short `the MBA').2. The facts, in brief, as projected by the petitioner are that the petitioner took admission for...
Tag this Judgment!Chhattisgarh Chemist Druggist Association Raipur Vs. State of Chhattis ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION C No 2522 of 2010 Chhattisgarh Chemist Druggist Association Raipur ...Petitioners VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh Others ...Respondents ! Shri R K Kesharwani Advocate for the petitioner ^ Shri V V S Moorthy Deputy Advocate General for the State respondens CORAM: Honble Shri Satish K Agnihotri J Dated:29. 11/2012 : Judgement ORDER (Delivered on 29th day of November, 2012) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 22 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 05.04.2010 (Annexure P/1) whereby the appeal against the order dated 07.08.2009, passed by the Registrar, Firms & Societies, has been affirmed and the appeal of the petitioner has been dismissed, and further, the order dated 07.08.2009 (Annexure P/5), passed by the Registrar, Firms & Societies whereby it had directed to inspect the functioning, establishment and financial condition of the petitioner's association.2. The facts, in brief, are tha...
Tag this Judgment!G H Sagar Vs. State of Chhattisgarh Others
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH BILASPUR WRIT PETITION S NO 182.OF 201.G H Sagar ...Petitioner Versus State of Chhattisgarh Others ...Respondents ! Shri Mateen Siddiqui Advocate for the petitioner ^ Shri P K Bhaduri Panel Lawyer for the State Shri Prafull Bharat Advocate for the respondent No 4 None for the respondent No CORAM: Honble Shri Satish K Agnihotri J Dated:29. 11/2012 : Judgement ORDER (Delivered on this 29th day of November, 2012) (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) 1. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 12.04.2012 (Annexure - P/1) whereby the respondent No.4 Munendra Kumar Sahu working as Assistant Engineer, office of the Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division - I, Raipur, on promotion to the post of Executive Engineer (for short ".EE".) was transferred to the post of Research Officer, M.R.P. Quality Control Unit - 2, Raipur.2. The facts, if brief, as projected by the petitioner, are that the petitioner was working as In-cha...
Tag this Judgment!Anmol Ram Singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH BILASPUR WRIT PETITION S NO 644.OF 201.Anmol Ram Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others ...Respondents ! Shri Suresh Pandey Advocate for the petitioner ^ Shri Pankaj Shrivastava Panel Lawyer for the State CORAM: Honble Shri Satish K Agnihotri J Dated:29. 11/2012 : Judgement ORDER (Delivered on this 29th day of November, 2012) (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) 1. By this petition the petitioner seeks to challenge the legality and the validity of the order dated 26.09.2011 (Annexure - P/1) passed by the respondent No.3 by which the petitioner has been removed from the post of Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Jhilmili, Janpad Panchayat, Bhaiyathan, Tahsil Surajpur, District Sarguja.2. The facts, in brief, as projected by the petitioner, are that the petitioner was duly elected Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat, Jhilmili, Janpad Panchayat, Bhaiyathan, Tahsil Surajpur, District Sarguja, on 03.02.2010 (Annexure - P/2). Accordi...
Tag this Judgment!Arya Shikshan Samiti Vs. Bhuneshwar Sharma Others
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION C No 3760 of 2008 Arya Shikshan Samiti ...Petitioners VERSUS Bhuneshwar Sharma Others ...Respondents ! Shri B P Sharma Advocate for the petitioner ^ Shri Malay Bhaduri Advocate for the respondent No 1 to 4 Shri V V S Moorthy Deputy Advocate General for the State responden CORAM: Honble Shri Satish K Agnihotri J Dated:29. 11/2012 : Judgement ORDER (Delivered on 29th day of November, 2012) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 1 Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 03.08.2005 (Annexure P/12) passed by the Registrar, Firms & Societies, Raipur, whereby the termination of the respondent No. to 4 from the membership of the petitioner/Society has been held to be illegal and the same has been set aside, further, the order dated 29.04.2008 (Annexure P/1) passed by the respondent No. whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner/Society before the State Government, against the order dated 03.08.2005 h...
Tag this Judgment!Devesh Kumar Payasi Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH BILASPUR WRIT PETITION S NO 245.OF 201.& WRIT PETITION S NO 227.OF 201.& WRIT PETITION S NO 228.OF 201.& WRIT PETITION S NO 2 & WRIT PETITION S NO 234.OF 201.& WRIT PETITION S NO 235.OF 201.& WRIT PETITION S NO 237.OF 201.& WRIT PETITION S NO Devesh Kumar Payasi Deepak Kumar Pandey Hemant Kumar Mahant & Another Rameshwar Prasad Yadav & Aother Roshan Kumar & Another Ved Prakash Singh & Another Rajesh Kumar Sahu & Others Vikas Kumar Shriwas & Another Brijnandan Yadav Virendra Kumar Sharma Sandeep Yadav Mayank Kumar Tiwari Jaiprakash Gautam Prashant Kumar Gautam Deepak Kumar Patel Sandeep Kumar Tirkey Dineshlal Verma Anant Verma Dharmendra Kumar Sahu Mukesh Kumar Mishra Hemchandra Keewat Abhilash Gupta Ramayan Prasad Dwivedi Md Mushtaq Khan Vipin Kumar Shukla Divesh Tripathi Gorelal Baiga Ramchandra Tiwari Ram Kumar Ram Devraj Singh Biharilal Rajwade Brijesh Kumar Yadav Pankaj Singh Anjanilal Halwai Smt Jyoti Ka...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner Customs and Central Excise Vs. Ms Advani Oerlikon Ltd Rai ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CER No 16 of 2001 Commissioner Customs and Central Excise ...Petitioners VERSUS Ms Advani Oerlikon Ltd Raipur Plant ...Respondents ! Mr Garry Mukhopadhyay Advocate for the applicant ^ Mr Anumeh Shrivastava Advocate for the respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE & HONBLE MR G MINHAJUDDIN JJ Dated:19. 11/2012 : Judgement ORDER (Passed on 19/11/2012) REFERENCE APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 3 H 1 OF THE CENTRAL EXCISE ACT 194.Per Abhay Manohar Sapre, J:- (1) This is a reference application made by the Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise) under Section 35-H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short called ".the Act".). It arises out of an order dated 20/4/2001 passed by Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for short called `the Tribunal".) in final order No. A/606/01-NB (SM). (2) By impugned order, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue and in consequence upheld the order pas...
Tag this Judgment!Anil Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH BILASPUR WRIT PETITION C No 635 of 2012 Anil Kumar Bharadwaj ...Petitioners V E R S U S State of Chhattisgarh & Others ...Respondents ! Ms Farah Minhaz Advocate for the petitioner ^ Shri V V S Murthy Dy Advocate General for the State respondent No 1 Shri S S Rajput and Shri Anant Bajpai Advocate for the CORAM: Honble Shri Satish K Agnihotri J Dated:19. 11/2012 : Judgement ORDER (Passed on this 19th day of November, 2012) (Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner seeks a writ/direction to set aside/quash the order dated 22.03.2012 (Annexure P/1) passed by the respondent No. whereby the petitioner has been debarred from appearing in next two consecutive semester examinations with immediate effect. The petitioner further seeks a direction to the respondent authorities to allow the petitioner to appear for the final semester examination which was to be held from 16.04.2012 onwards....
Tag this Judgment!The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Devanand Urf Tejumal Ahuja ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Nov-12-2012
S. C. VYAS, PRESIDENT 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 23.08.2012 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg (C.G.) (hereinafter called District Forum for short), passed in Complaint Case No.206/2011, whereby the appellant/Insurance Company, has been directed to pay Rs.40,000/ to the complainant/respondent No.1, along with interest @ 7% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint till date of payment and also to pay Rs.1,000/ as compensation for mental agony and Rs.1,000/ as cost of litigation, on the allegation that it committed deficiency in service in not paying the amount spent by the complainant/respondent No.1 on his treatment, though he was covered by a medical insurance policy issued by the appellant/Insurance Company in favour of the agents of a group of the respondent Nos.2 and 3/Insurance Corporation. 2. In nutshell, the facts of the case are that in the year 200506, Mediclaim Insurance Policy for a period between 01.09.2007 to 31.08.2008 was issued ...
Tag this Judgment!Madanlal Sahu, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) Vs. Manager, Umang Force, Durg (C.G. ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Nov-12-2012
V.K. Patil, Member, J. 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 18.05.2012 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,Durg ( hereinafter called District Forum for short) in complaint case no.08/2011 whereby complaint of the appellant herein, alleging deficiency in service against the respondents, has been dismissed. 2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the complainant had purchased a four wheeler vehicle M4 from OP no.1/dealer on 26.11.2007 for total sum of Rs.2,77,000/when Rs.50,000/was deposited by him as margin money and Rs.2,20,000/was paid by way of finance made available by OP no. 2/finance company. The chassis no. of the vehicle was 19002459J/07 and engine no. was 30002602. Complainant averred that at the time of delivery of the vehicle, gate pass and delivery receipt were only provided and no documents related to the vehicle such as registration certificate, fitness certificate and insurance certificate were provided. Complainant averred that the vehicl...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »