Chhattisgarh Court November 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lakshya Infrastructure Private Limited Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and O ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-08-2011
(Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India) 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks to quash the order dated 18.01.2011 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Collector, Raigarh, whereby, the Collector, has directed the Tahsildars of Raigarh, Pusor, Sarangarh and Baramkela and the Sub Registrars of Raigarh and Sarangarh, not to register the sale deed in respect of the land of tribal till the further instructions from the State Government. The petitioner also seeks a direction to the respondent No.4 i.e. Sub Registrar, Raigarh to register the sale deed Annexure P-4 of the petitioner in accordance with the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908 (for short "the Act, 1908") and thereafter, issue the sale certificate. 2. The facts, in brief, as projected by the petitioner, are that one Santram Rathiya was the registered owner of the land in question and he sold the same to the petitioner after getting the full amount of consideration and after obtaining the permission ...
Assistant Commissioner Income Tax Raipur Vs. Major Deepak Mehta
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-08-2011
(Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961) SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J 1. The instant appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short "the Act, 1961") is against the order dated 7-10-2005 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short "the Tribunal") wherein the Tribunal has dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue and partly allowed the cross objection filed by the assessee. 2. This Court vide order dated 18-8-2011 admitted the appeal on the following substantial question of law: "Whether on facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in annulling the assessment framed u/s 143 (3)/147 by the assessing officer." 3. The facts, in brief, are that the assessee was engaged in the business of poultry farming in the name and style of Royal Poultry Farm. The assessee filed the income return for the AY 1997 - 98 on 22-12-1997 declaring its income of Rs.1,49,854/-. The return was processed under Section 143 (1) on t...
Commissioner of Income Tax Bilaspur Vs. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-08-2011
(APPEAL UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961) SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. 1. The instant appeal has been filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Bilaspur (hereinafter referred to as `the Revenue') against the order dated 19.04.2006 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jabalpur, (for short ‘the Tribunal') in I.T.A No. 301/Jab/1999. 2. The appeal of the Revenue was admitted by this Court on 13.02.2007 on the following substantial questions of law: "(i). Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal were right in law in deleting the sum of Rs. 19,30,000/- added by the Assessing Officer to the assessee's total income as undisclosed loan advanced by the assessee within the meaning of Section 69 and 69(C) of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 1992-03? (ii) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case the Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal were justified in law in agreeing that the impugned amount co...
Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Shankarnagar and Others Vs. Anupam Pandey ...
Court: Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
Decided on: Nov-08-2011
Mrs. Veena Misra, Member: 1. This Order will govern disposal of Appeal Nos. 410/2011and 436/2011 which have been respectively preferred by complainant and OPs against order dated 27.6.2011 passed in complaint Case No.108/2010 by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (hereinafter referred to as District Forum for short) whereby the Ops were directed to pay interest @6 % per annum from the date of each installment deposited by the complainant and also to pay Rs.5,000/- towards compensation for mental harassment and Rs.1,000/- towards cost of proceedings. For the sake of convenience and to avoid confusion of any sort parties will be referred in this order as complainant and OPs. 2. Brief facts necessary for disposal of these appeals are that the complainant had booked an MIG Delux house at Saddu, Raipur with OPs under Self-Finance Scheme. Complainant was duly informed by the OPs vide letter dated 06.07.2006 that on the basis of his application dated 16.11.2005, House No. 84 has be...
Dhanmad Sai Dehari Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-04-2011
(Writ Petition Under Article 226 Of The Constitution Of India) 1. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 05.05.2011 (Annexure P-1), passed by the respondent No.4, whereby, the representation of the petitioner to quash the transfer order dated 01.01.2011 was rejected. 2. The indisputable facts, in brief, are that the petitioner, working as Station House Officer in Police Station Torwa, Bilaspur, was transferred to District Bijapur by order dated 01.01.2011. Being aggrieved, the petitioner preferred a writ petition before this Court in W.P.(S) No.78/2011 (Shri Dhanmad Sai Dehari v. State of Chhattisgarh and Another) (Annexure P-6). This Court, after hearing learned counsel appearing for the parties, granted liberty to the petitioner to make a representation, on his request, to consider his case under the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Police Act, 2007. It was further observed that in the event, the representation is made, the same should be considered and decided within a perio...
Anil Kumar Sharma Vs. Guru Ghasidas University and Another
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-04-2011
(Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to rectify the mistake in the mark sheet and declared the petitioner as passed in the subject of Elementary Surgery, Orthopedics, Ent, Ophthalmol. 2. The brief facts, relevant for adjudication, is that the petitioner was admitted to the course of Practitioner in Modern and Holistic Medicine (for short PMHM), as regular student in respondent No.2/ Medical Institute Pendra, affiliated to Guru Ghasidas University/ respondent No.1. According to the petitioner, as per the statement of marks for examination held in April-May 2007, the petitioner was declared as passed in all the subject except Medicine and Paediatrics (for short "Medicine") and Obstetrics and Gynaecology (for short "Gynaecology"). In Elementary Surgery, Orthopedics, Ent, Ophthalmol (for short "Elementary Surgery"), he was awarded 54 marks and, as such, declared as pass. Thereafter, the state...
Chandra Jadhav and Others Vs. Rameshwar Kumar Panigrahi and Others
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-04-2011
(Memo of appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act) Rajeev Gupta, C.J. 1) This is claimants' appeal for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Bastar at Jagdalpur (for short `the Tribunal') vide award dated 13.01.2010, passed in Claim Case No.309/2007. 2) As against the compensation of Rs.10,94,000/- claimed by the appellants/ claimants, unfortunate widow and minor daughters of deceased Suresh Jadhav, by filing a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, for his death in the motor accident on 23.10.2007, the Tribunal awarded a total sum of Rs.4,21,960/- as compensation along with interest @ 6% per annum in the event of the insurer's failure to deposit the amount of compensation within two months of the passing of the award. 3) The Tribunal on a close scrutiny of the entire evidence led before it held that deceased Suresh Jadhav died on account of the injuries sustained by him in the motor accident on 23.10.2007; the acciden...
Om Prakash Singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-03-2011
Oral Order (Petition Under Section 482 of the CrPC) 1. This petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the order dated 11.11.2008 passed in Criminal Case No.288/08, by which the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offence under Sections 467 and 120 -B of the IPC against the petitioner. 2. Before adverting to the contentions raised by learned counsel for the petitioner, it is apposite to refer to the brief facts of the case, necessary for adjudication of controversy involved in the petition, which are: One Nooro Bai lodged a report in the police station alleging that landed property belonging to her has been sold in her name by forging a sale deed. It was alleged that the land which was held by the lady was stated to have been mortgaged by her son - Satrughan to one Basant Yadav, co-accused, and time and again, upon being asked, the son kept on telling her that he had mortgaged the land with Basant. Later on, Nooro came to know thr...
Narendra Sahu and Another Vs. Kushal Sahu and Others
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-03-2011
(Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act) Rajeev Gupta, C.J. 1) This is claimants' appeal for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the 12th Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Durg (for short `the Tribunal') vide award dated 19.02.2010, passed in Claim Case No.133/2009. 2) As against the compensation of Rs.17,00,000/- claimed by the appellants/claimants, unfortunate husband and major son of deceased Smt Ramkunwar by filing a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act for her death in the motor accident on 01.02.2007, the Tribunal awarded a total sum of Rs.1,32,000/- as compensation along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of actual payment. 3) The Tribunal on a close scrutiny of the entire evidence led before it held that deceased Smt Ramkunwar died on account of the injuries sustained by her in the motor accident on 01.02.2007; the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving...
Hem Kumari Sharma Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-02-2011
SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J. 1. This intra-court appeal arises from the order dated 26th April, 2007 (Annexure A-1) passed in Writ Petition No.1719 of 2001 (Smt. Hem Kumari Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others), whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant was dismissed by the, then, learned Chief Justice, sitting single. 2. The case of the appellant, in short, is that the husband of the appellant was working as Head Master in a Government School. He joined the service on 16th July, 1958. After attaining the age of superannuation, he retired from the service sometime in the year 1991. Immediately after his retirement from the service, the State Government has settled the terminal benefits payable to him. The husband of the appellant was receiving all these benefits without even a murmur. He died on 15th May, 1997 leaving behind the appellant and others. The petitioner for the first time has approached this Court by filing a writ petition in the year 2001, inter alia, seeking a dir...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »