Chhattisgarh Court January 2010 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Beekay Engineering Corporation
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jan-22-2010
Reported in: [2010]323ITR252(NULL)
1. Shri Rajeev Shrivastava with Smt. v. Shraddha Rao, counsel for the applicant.2. This reference has been made under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (henceforth 'the Act') by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Nagpur (henceforth 'the Tribunal') at the instance of the Revenue and the Tribunal has referred the following question of law for our opinion:Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that payment of Rs. 1,37,767 made to Bhilai Engineering Corporation pertains to the financial year 1989-90, as they were incorporated in the assessee's end product only within the financial year 1989-903. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as projected in paragraph 1 of the order of the Tribunal are that the assessee had made a payment of Rs. 1,36,767 to the Bhilai Engineering Corporation (henceforth the 'Corporation') in respect of certain jobs done by them from December, 1988, to June, 1989. The bills were raised by the p...
Sanjay Kumar Kesharwani Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jan-21-2010
Reported in: 2010CriLJ1844
T.P. Sharma, J.1. Since the aforesaid criminal appeal and the criminal revision are arising out of the same judgment dated 30-9-2002 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Janjgir, in Sessions Trial No. 113/2002, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. Criminal Appeal No. 1155/2002 has been filed on behalf of appellant Sanjay Kumar Kesharwani against the judgment of conviction & order of sentence dated 30-9-2002 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Janjgir, in Sessions Trial No. 113/2002, whereby and whereunder learned Additional Sessions Judge after holding the appellant guilty for commission of offence under Sections 302 & 201 of the IPC, sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and pay fine of Rs. 5,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo R.I. for two years and to undergo R.I. for two years, respectively.3. Criminal Revision No. 606/2002 has been filed on behalf of petitioners Smt. Tulsi Bai and ...
ishwari Prasad Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jan-21-2010
Reported in: 2010CriLJ1713
T.P. Sharma, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30-6-2003 passed by the 9th Additional Sessions Judge (F. T. C), Raipur, in Sessions Trial No. 21/2002, whereby and whereunder learned 9th Additional Sessions Judge after holding the appellant guilty for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 392 and 455 of the Indian Penal Code, sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months; rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months and rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months.2. Judgment is impugned on the ground that without there being any credible and clinching evidence, the Court below has con...
Deo Chandra Dubey Vs. Gangotri Tiwari and ors.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jan-06-2010
Reported in: 2010CriLJ1626
Sunil Kumar Sinha, J.1. Being aggrieved with the judgment of acquittal dated 24-4-2002 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Baikunthpur, District Korea (C. G.) in Sessions Trial No. 6/2002, the petitioner/father of the deceased has filed this criminal revision.2. The facts, briefly stated, are as under:Deceased Rupa Tiwari was the wife of respondent No. 3. Respondent No. 1 is the sister-in-law (Nanad) and respondent No. 2 is the mother-in-law of the deceased. The deceased was married with respondent No. 3 on 19-5-1996. She was residing in her in-laws place along with respondents 1 to 3.The case of the prosecution is that on 3-9-2001 respondent No. 2, Malti Devi, asked Prabhakar Daurey (PW-3, a neighbour) that her daughter-in-law deceased-Rupa was not well, therefore, he should call some Doctor. Prabhakar Daurey (PW-3) while going on his scooter to call the Doctor saw that respondent No. 3, Rakesh Kumar, was sitting near the video-hall. He informed him about the illness of the decea...
Madhukar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (Now Chhattisgarh)
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jan-05-2010
Reported in: 2010CriLJ1623
Pritinker Diwaker, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 6-8-1996 passed ; by he Additional Sessions Judge, Dhamtari in Sessions Trial No. 299/1994 convicting the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for four years and pay fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.2. Case of the prosecution in brief is that marriage of deceased-Nita with the present appellant was performed in the year 1990 and out of their wedlock two children were born. Further case of the prosecution is that from the very beginning of marriage the deceased was subjected to cruelty by the appellant and his mother namely Phulbasan Bai for demand of dowry as a result of which she committed suicide on 20-3-1994 by consuming poison. Merg intimation Ex. P-9 was given by an employee of the hospital and thereafter FIR Ex. P-13 was registered on 9-4-20...
Narendra Kumar Pal Vs. Santosh Kumar Chakradhari and ors.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jan-04-2010
Reported in: 2010(1)MPHT107(CG)
ORDERRajeev Gupta, C.J.1. Appellant-Narendra Kumar Pal, a minor boy aged about 16 years has filed this appeal through his father for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the 14th Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Raipur (for short 'the Tribunal') vide award dated 26-4-2005, passed in Claim Case No. 22/2004.2. As against the compensation of Rs. 21,00,000/- claimed by the appellant/claimant by filing a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act for the injuries sustained by him in the motor accident on 27-8-2002, the Tribunal awarded a total sum of Rs. 25,000/- as compensation along with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of actual payment.3. Shri Aditya Khare, learned Counsel for the appellant vehemently argued that the Tribunal has erred in awarding low compensation of Rs. 25,000/- only though the appellant/claimant sustained multiple serious injuries including fractures in the motor accident resulting in ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›