Chhattisgarh Court April 2009 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lafarge India Private Limited Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Apr-10-2009
Reported in: 2009(3)MPHT26(CG)
ORDERSunil Kumar Sinha, J.1. The appellant/petitioner has filed this appeal against the order dated 31-1-2007 passed in W.P. No. 131/2007 by the learned Single Judge of this Court.2. The facts briefly stated are as under:The appellant/petitioner is a Company incorporated and registered under the Companies Act, 1956. It is engaged in manufacture of Cement at their manufacturing unit situated at Village Arasmeta commonly called as Arasmeta Cement Plant. A demand notice dated 18-10-2005 was issued to the appellant/petitioner by the Addl. Tehsildar, Janjgir-Champa, towards recovery of electricity duty due to the appellant under the C.G. Electricity Duty Act, 1949. This was challenged by the appellant in W.P. No. 6384/2005. The said petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge of this Court at the motion stage by order dated 19-12-2005 reserving liberty to the appellant in the following terms:In the circumstance, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition. It is accordingly dis...
Mayaram Nishad Vs. Jamuna Bai
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Apr-09-2009
Reported in: 2009(3)MPHT37(CG)
ORDERDilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J.1. This Criminal Revision by the petitioner/husband is directed against the order dated 13.10.2006 passed in Criminal Revision No. 194/2005 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bemetara, District Durg whereby in a revision preferred by the respondent/wife while setting aside the dismissal of the application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. of the respondent/wife herein by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bemetara in Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 1/2004, the petitioner/husband herein was ordered to pay maintenance of Rs. 1000/- per month to the respondent herein from the date of application.2. Admittedly, marriage between the petitioner/husband and the respondent/wife was solemnized in the year 1982. Gauna ceremony took place in 1983 and out of their marital wedlock, a son namely Tukeshwar was born in 1984. It is also not in dispute that since the year 1985, the respondent/wife is living separately in her maternal home in village Kongiyakhurd. 3. For the firs...
Ganga Singroule Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Apr-02-2009
Reported in: 2009CriLJ3079
Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 22.06.2007 in Special Case No. 1/2007 by the Special Judge (under the N.D.P.S. Act), Bilaspur whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (henceforth 'the Act') and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years and a fine of Rs. 5000/- and in default of fine additional rigorous imprisonment for one year.2. Brief facts are that on 20.12.2006 on receiving secret information that the appellant was storing huge quantity of ganja at his residence in Ward No. 11, Chakarabhata, Sub-Inspector Arvind Dwivedi P.W.4 proceeded to the house of the appellant after completion of the necessary formalities. After searching the house of the appellant, he seized 16 kilograms ganja from one jute bag and 2.650 kilograms ganja from a rexine bag. Seized ganja and samples of 500 grams and 200 grams ganja taken therefrom were sealed and kept in the ...
Chairman-cum-managing Director, Secl and ors. Vs. Naval Kishore Mishra ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Apr-01-2009
Reported in: 2009(4)MPHT4(CG)
ORDERSunil Kumar Sinha, J.1. Being aggrieved with the order dated 3rd January, 2006 passed in W.P. 1685/2001 by the learned Single Judge of this Court, the appellants have filed this writ appeal.2. The facts, briefly stated, are as follows:The respondents/petitioners were appointed to the post of General Mazdoor Category-1 vide order dated 22-10-1995. Copies of their appointment orders have been filed as Annexures P-1 and P-2 before the Writ Court. According to the terms and conditions of the appointment, the services of the respondents/petitioners were terminable at any time, if it is found that the respondents/petitioners have produced false certificates of educational qualifications, residence, caste etc., either at the time of interview or at the time of appointment. The respondents had also given verification that their services may be terminated in case the information submitted by them is false.The service of the respondents were terminated vide order dated 22/23-10-1997 22/23-1...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›