Chhattisgarh Court September 2008 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kaliram Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Sep-08-2008
Reported in: 2009(2)MPHT1(CG)
ORDERSatish K. Agnihotri, J.1. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated 31-5-2005 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Board of Revenue in Revenue Appeal No. 65-A/ 27/2003-04, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed, maintaining the order dated 24-12-2003 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Dhamtari as well as the order dated 14-7-2003 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Naib Tehsildar, Kurud.2. The brief facts, in nutshell, as projected by the petitioner are, that the petitioner was an agriculturist. On 8-4-1970, the petitioner purchased the land under the registered sale deed bearing Khasra No. 177/2 (new No. 178) admeasuring 9.40 decimal at Village Thua, Circle Kurud, Tehsil Dhamtari, District Raipur. The petitioner was in possession of the said land. The fact that the land 'was purchased in the name of Kaliram Sahu (petitioner) was not in dispute. However, ownership was disputed by the respondent No. 4-brother of the petitioner, that such trans...
Reman Alias Raman S/O Harilal Bhandekar and anr. Etc. Vs. State of Chh ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Sep-08-2008
Reported in: 2008CriLJ4755
T.P. Sharma, J.1. Since all the aforesaid appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 24.6.2009 passed by the Sessions Judge, Rajnandgaon in Sessions Trial No. 10/2008, they are disposed of by this common judgment.2. These Criminal Appeals (Cr A 607/2008, 671/2008, 712/2008 and 633/2008) are directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 24-6-2008 passed by the Sessions Judge Rajnandgaon, in Sessions Trial No. 10/2008 whereby accused/appellants Dayanand alias Golu has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 489(a), 489(c) and 489(d) of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and pay fine of Rs. 2000/- Under Section 489(a), to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and pay fine of Rs. 2000/- under Section 489(c) and to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and pay fine of Rs. 2000/-. In default of payment of fine he shall undergo simple imprisonment for two months for each offence.Accused...
Ashish Sinha and ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Sep-04-2008
Reported in: 2009CriLJ184
T.P. Sharma, J.1. Cr.A. No. 506/2004 filed by Ashish Sinha, Cr.A. No. 562/2004 filed by Vijay K. Lakra and Cr.A. No. 601/2004 filed by Vijay Kumar Bariha have been preferred against the common judgment dated 13-5-2004 passed in Sessions Trial No. 375/2003, therefore, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. These appeals are directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 13-5-2004 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Korba in Sessions Trial No. 375/2003, whereby & whereunder learned Additional Sessions Judge after holding the accused/appellants guilty for commission of offence under Sections 120B, 397 read with Section 34 of the I.P.C., Sections 25(2) & 27(2) of the Arms Act, sentenced each of them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years & pay a fine of Rs. 3,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo simple imprisonment for one year under Sections 120B & 397 read with Section 34 of the IPC and to undergo rigorous imprison...
Ghunnu Ram Gawade Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Sep-04-2008
Reported in: 2009CriLJ559
T.P. Sharma, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 11-7-1990 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, Durg, in special Case No. 1/1988 whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (for short the 'Act') and Section 161 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and pay fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo RI for three months Under Section 5(2) of the Act and to undergo RI for one year Under Section 161, IPC2. The judgment of the trial Court is challenged on the ground that without there being any proof of motive or reward and acceptance or recovery of the alleged illegal gratification in breach of mandatory provisions of Section 5 (1) of the Act, learned Special Judge has committed an illegality in convicting and sentencing the accused/appellant as mentioned above.3. He...
Dhan Singh Chandan and anr. Vs. Murharam and ors.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Sep-04-2008
Reported in: 2008(5)MPHT20(CG)
ORDERD.R. Deshmukh, J.1. Heard finally.2. This is claimant's appeal for enhancement of compensation. The Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, F.T.C., Kondagaon (henceforth 'the Tribunal') has in Claim Case No. 106/2007 on dated 28-12-2007 awarded compensation of Rs. 1,78,400/- to the claimants for the death of their 19 year old daughter in a vehicular accident.3. Brief facts are that on 17-2-2006, daughter of the claimants, Ku. Pramila, aged about 19 years, was travelling as a labourer in a Tractor bearing Registration No. M.P.-25-B/2359 and Trolley driven by respondent No. 4 herein. The said tractor was dashed by Tata 709 vehicle bearing Registration No. MP-19-A/8471 driven by respondent No. 1, owned by respondent No. 2 and insured by respondent No. 3. Ku. Pramila died due to the accident. Evidence was led by the claimants to show that Ku. Pramila was a trained potter and also used to work as a labourer. The Tribunal assessed daily income of the deceased at Rs. 100/- and taking...
Chandra Kumar Chanuram and ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Sep-02-2008
Reported in: 2009CriLJ434
Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J.1. This judgment shall govern Cr.A. No. 389/2004 (appellant Chandra Kumar), Cr.A. No. 388/2004 (appellant Arvind Shukla), Cr.A. No. 393/20Q4 (appellant Rajendra Namdeo) and Cr.A. No. 396/2004 (appellant Hiraram Sanwra @ Chhotu).2. By judgment dated 12.04.2004 in Sessions Trial No. 347/2001 the above mentioned appellants have been convicted under Section 376 (2) (g) of the I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and a fine of Rs. 25.000/- each and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year each, for committing gang rape on the prosecutrix in the night of 30.08.2001. The learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Surguja has acquitted all the appellants from the charge under Sections 450,363 and 506-B read with Section 34 of the I.P.C.3. Briefly stated the prosecution case is that on 30.08.2001 at about 11.00 p.m. all the four appellants named above, who were posted as Constables at Chalgali Police Station, committed house t...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›