Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : 2008CriLJ2091
L.C. Bhadoo, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30th August, 2002 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Raigarh in Sessions Trial No. 133/2001, whereby & where-under learned Additional Sessions Judge after holding the accused/appellant guilty for commission of offence under Section 302 of the IPC, for committing the murder of Khadbad, sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life, however, he has been acquitted from charge under Section 201 of the IPC.2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, Is that wife of accused Dayaram started residing with Anjore Singh {son of deceased Khadbad) as his wife and for that reason the accused was having grudge against the family of Khadbad. On 6-5-2001 at about 4 p.m. Khadbad along with his granddaughter Nidra Bai went to his agricultural field, the accused/appellant came there and pushed Khadbad as a result of which he fell down. Thereafter, the accused attacked Khadbad o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : 2008(2)MPHT84(CG)
ORDERSatish K. Agnihotri, J.1. The petitioner, by this petition, challenges the validity of the order dated 12-1 -2006 (AnnexureP-5), whereby, appointment of the petitioner on the post of Urdu Shiksha Karmi Grade II in Nagar Panchayat, Gorella was cancelled on account of the facts that on scrutiny it was found that the process for selection was not done in accordance with rules. Further, order dated 3-1-2006 (Annexure R-l/7), issued by the respondent No. 3, i.e., Collector, Bilaspur, was also sought to be quashed.2. The indisputable facts, in brief, are that pursuant to the advertisement dated 11-5-05 (Annexure P-l), the petitioner made an application for appointment on the post of Urdu Shiksha Karmi Grade II. The petitioner was selected and was posted at Government Middle School, Gorella vide order dated 17-6-05 (Annexure P-3). The petitioner, accordingly, joined as Urdu Shiksha Karmi Grade II in Government Middle School, Gorella on 30-6-05 (Annexure P-4).3. The Collector, Bilaspur, o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : 2009(1)MPHT48(CG)
ORDER1. The petitioner is the directly elected President of Nagar Panchayat Nawagarh, whereas, respondent Nos. 6 to 17 are the elected Councillors. The strength of the Nagar Panchayat is 15.2. On 11-7-2007 respondent No. 11-Shri Jahid Beg moved an application (Annexure P-2) before respondent No. 2-Collector, Durg for recalling the petitioner from the post of President, Nagar Panchayat, Nawagarh claiming that 11 Other Councillors have also signed the application for recalling the petitioner. Respondent No. 3-Deputy Collector vide memo of Annexure P-3 summoned all the Councillors, who had signed the application of Annexure P-2 on 13-7-2007 in his office.3. The Collector, vide memo dated 13-7-2007 (Annexure P-6) addressed to the Secretary, Local Administration and Development, sent a report under Section 47 (2) of the C.G. Municipalities Act, 1961 (for brevity 'the Act') mentioning therein that proposal of 'recall against the petitioner' was received on 11-7-2007, 12 Councillors out of to...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : [2008(118)FLR972]; 2008(2)MPHT92(CG)
Sunil Kumar Sinha, J.1. The petitioners have challenged the validity of order dated 9-8-2002 passed by the Madhya Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur in T. A. No. 2678/88, whereby, their petition filed against the order of cancellation of their appointments was dismissed by the Tribunal.2. The brief facts are that in all 25 persons, including 11 petitioners, were appointed on the posts of Health Assistant in different Primary Health Centres in Bastar Division in between 21-1-1987 to 11-2-1987. According to their appointment orders, issued by the Joint Director Health Services Bastar Division (respondent No. 3), the said appointments were temporary appointments purely on ad hoc basis. Copy of one of such appointment orders is reproduced as under:dk;kZy; laHkkxh; la;qDr lapkyd LokLF; lsok,a cLrj laHkkx&txnyiqjdzekad@LFkk-@87@ txnyiqj fnukadvkns'kfuEufyf[kr O;fDr;ksa dks muds uke ds vkxs n'kkZ;s x;s LFkku ij osrueku 515&800@& :- rFkk 'kklu }kjk Lohd`r egaxkbZ HkRrk ij rnFkZ fu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh
Reported in : II(2008)DMC768
ORDERT.P. Sharma, J.1. This revision is directed against the order dated 22.8.2007 passed by II Additional Principal Judge Family Court, Raipur in Case No. 249/06. whereby the application filed by non-applicants under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as, 'the Code') was allowed.2. The question for decision of the present revision petition is that whether divorce has effected between applicant and non-applicant No 1 and in consequent to the divorce non-applicant No. 1 is not entitled for maintenance in accordance with the provisions of Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1986').3. Non-applicant No. 1 was married with applicant. Non-applicant No. 2 is a daughter of applicant and non-applicant No. 1. The application under Section 125 of the Code for maintenance was filed on behalf of non-applicants. In reply filed on behalf of the applicant before the learned II Additional Principal Judge, Fam...
Tag this Judgment!