Chhattisgarh Court July 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Hembai and ors. Vs. Bhilai Steel Plant
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jul-10-2007
Reported in: [2007(115)FLR978]; (2008)ILLJ643CG; 2007(3)MPHT123(CG)
Dhirendra Mishra, J.1. Appellants-applicants-legal representatives of the deceased workman Hemant Kumar have preferred this appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') against the order dated 16-2-2004 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Labour Court, Durg whereby the prayer of the appellants for payment of balance of compensation towards the death of Hemant Kumar who was working as technician in the Town Engineering Electrical Department of the respondent has been rejected.2. Learned Counsel for the appellants submits that there is no dispute regarding entitlement of Rs. 3,38,880/- towards compensation for the death of Hemant Kumar who died during the course of his employment under the respondents. The only grievance of the appellants is that the accident occurred on 17-5-2002 in the premises of the respondent when Hemant Kumar died during the course of his employment, however, only 50% of the pay...
Smt. Rukshana Bee Alias Durga Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jul-09-2007
Reported in: 2007CriLJ3668; 2007(4)MPHT61
Sunil Kumar Sinha, J.1. Being aggrieved with the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 9-3-2005 passed in Special Case No. 19/2004 by the Special Judge (NDPS Act), Bastar at Jagdalpur, whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short the NDPS Act) and sentenced to undergo R.I. for 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo R.I. for 2 years, she has filed this criminal appeal.2. The brief facts are that on an information received by the Sub-Inspector M. B. Patel (P.W.4), regarding bringing of Ganja from Orissa through a passenger Bus by a lady, he went to Dhanpunji Check Post after making relevant entries in Rosnamcha Sanha. He was accompanied by Head Constable Panchuram and constables No. 208, 210, 328 and 392. When the said Bus came over there, the lady was identified who told her name as Ruksana Bee alias Durga (present appellant). She wa...
Smt. Sarla Devi Gupta Vs. Smt. Tara Devi Dubey
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jul-03-2007
Reported in: 2007(4)MPHT54(CG)
D.R. Deshmukh, J.1. This is defendant's second appeal. She is aggrieved by the reversal of the judgment and decree passed in Civil Suit No. 39-A/2002, dated 12-8-2004 dismissing the plaintiff's suit for eviction by the VIIIth Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Bilaspur vide judgment dated 22-8-2006 delivered in Civil Appeal No 1-A/2005.2. Admittedly, the appellant/defendant is a tenant in the suit accommodation.3. The respondent/plaintiff instituted a suit on 15-10-1998 for eviction of the appellant/defendant from the suit premises pleading that she had let a portion of the house-cum-shop to the appellant/defendant on rent from 1-4-1997. It was pleaded that she required the accommodation for own house and for bona fide reason also. No other house or shop was available to the plaintiff within the limits of the Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur. Description of the accommodation let out to the appellant/defendant was shown in Schedule 'A' to the plaint. It was mentioned that the a...
Ramcharan and Etc. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jul-03-2007
Reported in: 2007CriLJ4223
Dhirendra Mishra, J.1. Criminal Appeal No. 344/2001 and Criminal Appeal No. 382/01 are being decided by this common judgment, as both these appeals are arising out of the judgment dated 30-3-2001 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Janjgir in Sessions Trial No. 32/97 whereby learned Additional Sessions Judge after holding the appellants guilty for causing deaths of deceased Tulsiram, Bullu Kashyap and Kachra Bai, convicted them under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced each of them to undergo R.I. for life and pay a fine of Rs. 200/- for each murder. It has been further directed that all the sentences shall run concurrently.2. Case of the prosecution, as unfolded from the charge-sheet, F.I.R. and statement of witnesses, is that deceased Tulsiram, Chintraram, father of appellant Ramcharan, Maniram, father of appellant Rampyare and Desrath were brothers. Appellant Mohitram and Ramawtar are sons of Rampyare. Before the date of incident Dashrath had died leaving ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›