Chhattisgarh Court June 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Roop Kunwar Vs. Roopnarayan
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jun-28-2007
Reported in: 2007(3)MPHT101(CG)
D.R. Deshmukh, J.1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 15-9-1997 passed in Civil Suit No. 13-A/1990 by Shri T.K. Chakravarty, Additional District Judge, Janjgir, the appellant/defendant has preferred this appeal.2. Admittedly, the parties are residents of Village Seoni, Tehsil and District Janjgir.3. Respondent/plaintiff instituted Civil Suit No. 13-A/1990 for specific performance of contract for sale of agricultural land. It was pleaded that the appellant/defendant had agreed to sell the suit land in area 1.48 acres to the respondent/plaintiff for a consideration of Rs. 24,000/- (The date of agreement was not pleaded). In the year 1986, the appellant/defendant received Rs. 15,000/- as part consideration and executed a document in favour of the respondent/plaintiff. (The date of execution of such document was also not pleaded). On 18-7-1987, the appellant/defendant received a further sum of Rs. 6,000/- and executed a Mahadanama, Exh. P-1 in favour of the respondent/ plain...
Chandikeshwar Singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jun-25-2007
Reported in: 2007(3)MPHT106(CG)
ORDERSatish K. Agnihotri, J.1. The present petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 30-1-2004 (Annexure P-12) passed by the respondent No. 2, whereby the petitioner has been terminated from the post of Panchayat Karmi of the Gram Panchayat Obri, Tehsil Pal, District Surguja, on the ground that the petitioner has committed irregularities in performance of his duties.2. The undisputed facts, in nutshell, are that the petitioner was appointed as Panchayat Karmi by order dated 6-12-1997 (Annexure P-1). The petitioner was thereafter declared as Panchayat Secretary of the said Gram Panchayat.3. The order dated 16-12-2003 (Annexure P-3) was issued to the petitioner by the Sarpanch, wherein it was directed to the petitioner to produce certain documents and registers of the Gram Panchayat, concerning the period February, 2000 to November, 2003, on 17-12-2003, very next day. It was further stated that in the event of any lapse or dereliction on th...
Fieldspares Sales and Services Vs. Ashvini Kumar Thakur and anr.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jun-11-2007
Reported in: 2007(3)MPHT109(CG)
Dhirendra Mishra, J.1. Heard on M.C.P. No. 1706/2006, an application for condonation of delay in filing this appeal, as the instant appeal has-been preferred with a delay of 314 days, as per office note dated 4-9-2006.2. Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that immediately after the award was passed certified copy of the impugned award was obtained on 29-8-2005 and the same was sent to the Head Office by Bilaspur Branch along with papers vide Annexure A-2 and thereafter, a reminder was sent on 4-1-2006, vide Annexure P-4. However, the Head Office communicated that the case file is misplaced due to shifting and in the meanwhile, R.R.C. was issued on 19-6-2006. Ultimately, the case filed was traced on 29-8-2006, at Nagpur and appeal was filed on 2-9-2006 after depositing the sum awarded before the Court below. Affidavit in support of this application has been filed.3. From the reasons assigned for delay in filing the instant appeal, it is evident that the appellant had not been d...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›