Chhattisgarh Court March 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Durg Sahkari Vipnan Samiti Maryadit and ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Mar-09-2007
Reported in: AIR2007Chh120
Vijay Kumar Shrivastava, J.1. All these writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India relate to challenge the validity of policy-decision for, transportation of food-grains to fair price shop which abstains marketing societies or consumer stores to carry both the works together of lead agency and fair price shops. Constitutional validity of imposition of condition whereby maximum limit of three fair price shops has been incorporated in Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2004 (for short 'Order 2004') for allotment of shops to various agencies. Issuance of public notice inviting tenders by the State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd., for transportation of foodgrains, and vires of Clause 9(1)(2)(3)(4) of the Order, 2004 as substituted vide notification dated 21-3-2006. Having common questions for decision all these petitions are taken together, and are being disposed on by this common order.2. The Essential Commodities Act, 1955, (for short, 'the Act, 1955') has bee...
Rajkumar Agrawal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Mar-08-2007
Reported in: 2007CriLJ2475
ORDERSunil Kumar Sinha, J.1. This is an application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant, who is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No. 130/2000, registered at Police Station Kusmunda, Distt. Korba (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(g) of I.P.C. and Section 3(2)(v) and 3(1)(xi) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the Special Act).2. The case of the prosecution is that the prosecutrix Ku. Rameshwari, aged about 13 years, belonging to Gond Caste, was brought by the co-accused persons namely Munnu Dubey and Radha Devi (husband and wife) from her village for some domestic work in the month of March, 2000 after promising to pay Rs. 500/- per month to her parents. The allegations are that few days thereafter one stout person came to their house and these two co-accused persons insisted the prosecutrix to have sexual i...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›