Chhattisgarh Court February 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Maruti Clean Coal and Power Limited (Maruti) Vs. South Eastern Coal Fi ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Feb-08-2007
Reported in: 2007(2)MPHT69
ORDERV.K. Shrivastava, J.1. This revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short 'the CPC') has been directed against the order dated 7-12-2006 passed by the Civil Judge, Class II, Katghora in Civil Suit No. 90-A of 2004 whereby petitioner's application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC for rejection of the plaint has been dismissed.2. State of Chhattisgarh executed a lease deed in favour of the petitioner and thereby leased out land measuring 37.91 acres bearing Khasra Nos. 850/24, 850/27, 850/28, 850/30, 850/31 and 850/32 which is the land in dispute. Respondent No. 1 claiming the land of his own on the ground that under the Coal Bearing Area (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957 the land has been acquired by the Central Government for them and they are accordingly title holders thereof, filed a civil suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction.3. Petitioner filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC for rejection of the plaint on the f...
R.K. Singh and anr. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Feb-06-2007
Reported in: 2007(2)MPHT73
ORDERSunil Kumar Sinha, J.1. Arguments heard.2. Common order passed as follows:These are the two bail applications filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicants, who are apprehending their arrest in connection with Crime No. 195/2006, registered at Police Station Dipka, District Korba (CG) for the offence punishable under Sections 342, 294, 323 and 506B read with Section 34 of the IPC and Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Special Act'). 3. The brief facts are that the complainant namely- Julious Lakra was a Security Guard under a private agency known as 'Thunderbolt Security Services Camp Gevra, District Korba'. The applicants were also working in the same concern. The victim was working in the said concern since 16-6-2004. On 3-10-2006, at about 8.30 a.m., the victim was called by the applicant- Pushpendra Singh, who said to him ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›