Chhattisgarh Court November 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shriram Steels Vs. Vandana Trailers
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-26-2007
Reported in: AIR2008Chh34
Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J.1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 17-3-2006 passed by the Additional District Judge, Sakti in Civil Suit No. 7-B/2003, where by the suit for recovery of Rs. 1,49,598.31 was decreed in favour of the respondent/plaintiff, the appellant/defendant has preferred this appeal.2. In this appeal, it is not in dispute that the respondent/plaintiff, a woman entrepreneur, has business of steel at Sakti in the name of M/s. Vandana Trailers, Sakti. The appellant/defendant also deals in supply of steel and has his business in the name of M/s. Shriram Steels at Raipur. He also undertakes supply of steel as per orders placed. M/s. Ankur Steel Agency is also situated at Raipur. It is also not in dispute that the appellant/defendant had received two demands drafts of Rs. 1,00,000/- each at Raipur on 11-2-2002 and 21-2-2002.3. The respondent/plaintiff pleaded that outside traders after orally entering into a contract at Sakti used to supply raw material at Sakt...
Vidya Charan Shukla Vs. State Through Central Bureau of Investigation ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-26-2007
Reported in: 2008CriLJ1333
ORDERSunil Kumar Sinha, J.1. The brief facts are that one Ram Avtar Jaggi, a leader of Natist Congress Party was shot at 11.40 p.m. on 4.6.2003 and in this connection, a First Information Report was lodged in P.S. Moudhapara, Raipur as F.I.R. No. 104/2003 for the offences punishable under Sections 447 and 307 I.P.C. This F.I.R. was lodged at the instance of V.K. Pandey, the Station House Officer, P.S. Moudhapara Raipur. Ram Avtar Jaggi died in the hospital. On 5.6.2003 at 2.15 a.m., another report vide F.I.R. No. 105/2003 was again registered for the same incident under Section 302 I.P.C. on the instance of Satish Jaggi, son of the deceased. Thereafter, five accused person were arrested in connection with CrimeNo. 104/2003 by the State Police and the charge- sheet was filed against them before the concerned Court. Later on, the case was committed to the Court of Sessions giving rise to Sessions TrialNo. 334/2003. It appears that during the course of trial, an application under Section ...
Laxmi Prasad Dubey Vs. Gulam Ali and ors.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-21-2007
Reported in: AIR2008Chh24
ORDERDilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J.1. This revision is preferred by one of the defendants against the order by which the defendants' appeal under Order 43, Rule 1(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') has been dismissed by order dated 22-1-1999 passed by Smt. Nirmala Singh, Vth Additional District Judge, Bilaspur (hereinafter referred to as 'the lower appellate Court') in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No. 47/ 98. In this appeal, the defendants had challenged the order dated 17-10-1997 passed by Shri S. S. Netam, IIIrd Civil Judge Class-II, Bilaspur (hereinafter referred to as 'the trial Court') in Miscellaneous Civil Case No. 17/97 by which their application under Order 9, Rule 13 of the Code for setting aside the ex parte judgment and decree dated 23-7-1990 passed in Civil Suit No. 117-A/88 by the trial Court was rejected.2. This case demonstrates how a pedantic and hyper-technical view taken by the Court while considering an application under Secti...
Ravanna and ors. Vs. Pitambar Lal Sao and ors.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-16-2007
Reported in: 2009ACJ1518
L.C. Bhadoo, J.1. The claimants, who are wife, daughter and son of late Chinna Rao, have preferred this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, being aggrieved by the award dated 6.8.96 passed by Third Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Bastar at Jagdalpur in Claim Case No. 46 of 1995 whereby the learned Tribunal even though assessed loss of dependency to the tune of Rs. 1,68,000 amongst other compensation under the heads of loss of consortium, love and affection, shock and mental agony to the tune of Rs. 10,000, Rs. 4,000 and Rs. 2,000 respectively and held that they are entitled for compensation of Rs. 1,84,000 in all, along with 12 per cent interest per annum from the date of filing of claim petition, but dismissed the petition of the claimants on the ground that the Claims Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the petition. The claimants ought to have filed the petition under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 before the Commissioner for Workmen's Compe...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›