Chhattisgarh Court July 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ravi Ranjan Kumar Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jul-06-2006
Reported in: AIR2006Chh159; 2006(4)MPHT1
ORDERS.R. Nayak, C.J.1. In this batch of writ petitions, the action of the Regional Transport Officers in altering/changing the maximum gross vehicle weight of the motor vehicle mentioned in the Certificates of Registration has been assailed. The question of law that arises for decision in this batch of writ petition is common and same. The writ petitions were, therefore, clubbed, heard them together and they are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.2. The basic facts germane to the decision-making be noted first and they are as follows :- The jurisdictional Regional Transport Officers while registering the subject motor vehicles, in violation of the maximum gross vehicle weights specified by the Central Government for various categories of vehicles in the notification issued by it by virtue of the power granted to it under Sub-section (1) of Section 58 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act'), fixed the maximum gross vehicle weight which is in excess to and...
Suraj Singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jul-04-2006
Reported in: 2006CriLJ3476
Fakhruddin, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. The appellant has preferred this appeal against the judgment delivered on 24-11-2000 in Sessions Trial No. 49/99 by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Raigarh, whereby he has been convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo, R.I. for 4 months, for committing murder of his brother Shashibhushan.3. Briefly stated that prosecution, story is that P.W.-1 Shivlal had four sons. Deceased Shashibhushan, accused Suraj, Jwala and Digambar. Accused Suraj, deceased Shashibhushan, Jwala were living with the father P.W.-1 Shivlal. Suraj was earning separately. Five months before the date of incident, all the four brothers had given a loan to their brother-in-law Digri (PW-5). The deceased took back Rs. 2000/- from Digri without disclosing this fact to the accused. When Suraj came to know this fact he got annoyed wi...
Sodhuram Vs. Durga Prasad and ors.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jul-03-2006
Reported in: AIR2006Chh136
S.K. Sinha, J.1. This appeal has been directed against the impugned judgment and decree dated 25-9-1996, passed in Civil suit No. 8-A/1994 by the First Additional Judge to the Court of Distt. Judge, Bilaspur (C.G.). By the aforesaid judgment and decree, the plaintiffs suit for partition and separate possession has been decreed by the trial Court.2. The brief facts are that the plaintiffs, who are the successors of one Nohar Sai, filed a suit for partition and separate possession in relation to the suit house situated in village Champa, the then Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.). The plaint allegations are that Nohar Sai, Sodhu Ram and Dwarpal were the real brothers. The suit house was a joint family property. Nohar Sai was having 1/3rd share in the suit house. In the year 1968, in lieu of recovery of a loan taken by Sodhu Ram from Kosa Bunkar Sahkari Samiti, Champa, this property was attached and was put to auction. On this action, Nohar Sai filed a suit for declaration that the property was of j...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›