Chhattisgarh Court June 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dilip Kumar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (Now State of Chhattisgarh)
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jun-16-2006
Reported in: 2006CriLJ3530
Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 8-3-1990 delivered by Shri K. L. Kori, 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur in Sessions Trial No. 86/87 whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 376, I.P.C. and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years.2. The factual matrix, in brief, is that the prosecutrix, a minor girl aged about 13 years, had gone to village Kutesar, to the house of her maternal uncle Baanduram P.W. 3 for performing certain agricultural operations. Her father Itwari lived in village Dumartarai. On 22-12-1986 at about 8.30 a.m. while the prosecutrix had gone to collect cow-dung, the appellant came from the nearby village tank and forcibly committed rape on her after gagging her mouth by a piece of cloth. After committing rape, the appellant threatened the prosecutrix not to disclose the incident to anyone. However, the prosecutrix promptly informed the incident to her maternal uncle Baanduram P.W. 3, Dash...
Lakhmu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jun-14-2006
Reported in: 2006CriLJ3205
Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment 14-7-2005 delivered by Shri Ravishanker Sai, 4th Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), Jagdalpur in Sessions Case No. 492/2000 whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 376(2)(g), IPC and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and a fine of Rs. 200/- and in default of payment of fine, the appellant was ordered to undergo additional rigorous imprisonment for three months.2. Briefly stated the factual matrix is that on 11-1-2000 Manmati P.W. 1, aged about 18 years, a married woman had gone to forest along with Cheti Bai P.W. 2 and her daughter Meghwati for collection of leaves. The appellant-Lakhmu and one Sonsingh arrived there and threatened Cheti Bai and Meghwati at the show of Tangia whereupon they left for the village. The appellant Lakhmu and co-accused Sonsingh forcibly removed the gold and silver ornaments worn by Manmati and thereafter appellant Lakhmu and Sonsingh committed rap...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›