Chhattisgarh Court May 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr. Sunil Puri Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: May-05-2006
Reported in: 2006CriLJ2866
ORDERSunil Kumar Sinha, J.1. A short question raised for consideration is as to 'Whether a lawyer engaged by the first informant has a right of audience while opposing a bail application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ?2. The brief facts are that apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 16/2006, registered at Police Station Telibandha, Raipur (C.G.) for commission of the offence punishable under Section 409 of the IPC, the applicant has field this application Under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as Cr. P.C. or Code) for grant of anticipatory bail. It is stated that the first informant is Indira Gandhi Agricultural University, Raipur. After filing of this application, the first informant, by M.Cr. P. No. 566/2006 is seeking permission to assist prosecution and to make objection to the bail application. A reply to the said application has been filed by the applicant and the same is opposed. During the course of ar...
Amit Jogi Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and anr.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: May-03-2006
Reported in: 2006CriLJ3349
ORDERS.R. Nayak, C.J.1. This is an application for bail filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Code'). This is the second bail application filed by the applicant herein in this Court. The first application was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 23-9-2005. This Court, however, in paragraph 28 of the order observed thus:For the aforesaid reasons, I am not inclined to grant bail to the applicant Amit Jogi. Nonetheless, the applicant Amit Jogi is a young man aged about 27 years having a long future and has remained in confinement since July, 2005 on the basis of the materials collected in course of the investigation by the CBI which are yet to be tested and proved in the trial. The offence for which he has been arrested, as stated above, is of a serious nature which concerns the general public of not only the city of Raipur but also the entire State of Chhattisgarh. This is, therefore, a fit case in which the trial should be expedited and comp...
Chandan Soni Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: May-03-2006
Reported in: 2006CriLJ3528
ORDERDilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J.1. This criminal revision is directed against the order dated 24-3-2006 passed by Shri N. K. Chandrawanshi, IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur in Sessions Trial Number 24/2006 whereby charge under Section 305 of the IPC was framed against the applicant.2. Briefly stated the prosecution story is that the applicant was serving as a driver in the house of one Smt. Sheela Verma. He was convicted in Sessions Trial Number 298/ 2003 for committing rape on Ku. Aakansha Verma, daughter of Smt Sheela Verma and also sentenced to imprisonment for life and fine. The applicant was on bail during trial. It is alleged that the applicant used to intimidate Ku. Aakansha Verma through telephone calls. Crime Number 76/2004 was registered under Section 507 of I.P.C. against the applicant and after investigation prosecution was launched. The applicant continued to intimidate Ku. Aakansha Verma by threatening that he would take revenge and would kill her and her mother. ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›