Chhattisgarh Court March 2006 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. Ram Suhag and ors.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Mar-02-2006
Reported in: (2006)3LLJ291CG
ORDERSatish K. Agnihotri, J.1. The Respondent No. 1 (Shri Ram Suhag) was employed by the petitioner as Mazdoor. The memorandum dated October 20, 1992 (Annexure P/2) was issued to the Respondent No. 1 containing following charge:Shri Ram Suhag while working as Attendant in A. R. Shop, B. S. P. has been guilty of 'willful/habitual absence from duty without prior permission/sanction of leave by the Competent Authority' inasmuch as he absented from duty unauthorisedly from September 25, 1992 to October 9, 1992.2. According to the petitioner, proper enquiry was held and the enquiry officer submitted his report. On the basis of the said report the disciplinary authority agreeing with the report imposed the punishment of termination from service which is within the jurisdiction of the disciplinary authority.3. The respondent No. 1 while admitting his guilt of remaining absent from September 25, 1992 to October 9, 1992 gave an undertaking that he would not commit such an act in future and pray...
Trilochan Verma Vs. the State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Mar-01-2006
Reported in: 2006CriLJ2085
Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 28th June, 2005 delivered by Shri M. S. Kerketta, 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Baloda Bazar, District Raipur in Sessions Case No. 16/2005 whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 376(2)(f) of the I.P.C. and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default to undergo additional rigorous imprisonment for 6 six months.2. Briefly stated the prosecution story is that on 7-11-2004 at about 5.30 p.m. the prosecutrix, a girl aged about 11 years, was sent by her mother Urmila Bai P.W. 1 to the House of one Sitaram for returning the grinding stone. After half an hour, the prosecutrix returned home crying and told Urmila Bai P.W. 1 that while she was in the lane near the house of Lachhan Yadav, the appellant caught hold of her, took her to the Badi and removing her underwear committed rape on her.3. F.I.R. Ex.P. 1 was lodged soon thereafter at 10.00 p.m. at Po...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›