Chhattisgarh Court July 2005 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State Bank of India Vs. Laxminarayan and anr.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jul-05-2005
Reported in: 2005(4)MPHT52(CG)
V.K. Shrivastava, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 18-7-1990 passed by the Vth Additional District Judge, Bilaspur in Civil Suit No. 24-B of 1989 (State Bank of India v. Laxminarayan and Anr.) by which the suit filed for recovery of loan together with interest has been dismissed.2. Plaintiff/appellant filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 88,276.81 against the defendants/respondents by sale of mortgage and hypothecated property on the ground that the respondent No. 1 applied for a loan of Rs. 73,400/- for purpose of tractor and trolley and other agricultural implements on 7-2-1981, that loan was sanctioned by the Branch Manager on 11-2-1981 and the debt of Rs. 73,400/- was paid to respondent No. 1 with interest @ 6% above the bank rate with a minimum of 10.5% per annum or at such rate which may be prevalent at the bank for such loans and in default of payment of instalment, penal interest @ 2% was stipulated. Both the respondents executed the loan documents...
Shiv Kumar Chandrakar Vs. Shashikala Alias Devyani
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jul-05-2005
Reported in: 2005(4)MPHT9(CG)
V.K. Shrivastava, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 26-7-1993 passed by the 3rd Additional District Judge, Raipur in Civil Suit No. 159/1991, by which the petition filed by the appellant for restitution of conjugal rights or in alternate, decree of divorce, has been dismissed.2. Facts material for disposal of this appeal are that appellant and respondent were married on 30-6-1971 according to Hindu Rights, at Raipur and out of their wedlock, a daughter was born. They lived together upto August, 1971, thereafter, without having sufficient cause, respondent left her matrimonial home and is living separately since then, and despite various efforts of the appellant, she is not coming back to join her matrimonial house. Therefore, appellant filed an application for restitution of conjugal rights, or in alternate, for grant of divorce.3. Respondent in reply, pleaded that she was constrained to live separately as a result of cruel behaviour of her husband and ...
Shivam Motors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jul-01-2005
Reported in: [2005(106)FLR1091]
Satish K. Agnihotri, J.1. The present petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is filed against the award dated 20.5.2002 passed by the Labour Court, Bilaspur in case No. 59/I.D.A./K-111-A/OO (Ref) whereby the Presiding Officer of the Labour Court has directed the petitioner (second party) to reinstate the Respondent No. 3 (first party) in the service on the post of Mechanic w.e.f. 31.8.1999 with full back wages and consequential relief.2. The facts in nutshell are that according to the respondent No. 3 he was engaged/appointed by the petitioner as Mechanic in his company on 1.10.1994. He continuously worked in the petitioner-company for more than 240 days in one calendar year till his services were terminated orally without prior notice an 31.8.1999. While in employment he was getting a salary of Rs. 1150/- p.m.3. The respondent No. 3 approached the Additional Labour Commissioner complaining about termination without complying with the provisions of Section 25-F of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- Next ›