Chhattisgarh Court February 2005 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gopal Vishvas Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Feb-10-2005
Reported in: 2005CriLJ3319
ORDERFakhruddin, A.C.J.1. Heard.2. This petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant against the order dated 2-12-2004 passed by the learned First Addl. Sessions Judge, Sarguja, Ambikapur in Criminal Rev. No. 348/2004 whereby the revision filed against the order dated 4-11 -2004 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambikapur has been rejected.3. Counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is the person who is carrying on the business of Television Network. An-nexure A-2 is the registration certificate issued by the District Excise Officer. It is submitted that he is the authorized Cable Operator by Z TV to telecast its Channels. It is stated that he is doing the business lawfully. It is further submitted that there is another competitor namely Vande Matram, who does not want the applicant to carry on the business. It is submitted that at his behest, the police have acted and registered the offence under Section 16 of Cable Television Networks Regulat...
Riaz Ahmad Siddique Vs. Smt. Pratibha Devi Sinha and ors.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Feb-09-2005
Reported in: 2005(3)MPHT21(CG)
ORDERDhirendra Mishra, J.1. Heard on the question of admission.2. This second appeal has been preferred by the appellant/defendant against the judgment and decree dated 12-10-2004 passed by the First Additional District Judge, Ambikapur confirming the judgment and decree dated 26-4-2003 passed by Civil Judge Class I, Ambikapur in Civil Suit No. 24/01/2002. The Trial Court decreed the suit filed by the plaintiff for eviction on the ground that the original tenant had inducted sub tenant without written consent of the landlord according to Section 12(1)(b) of the Chhattisgarh Accommodation Control Act which was subsequently confirmed by the First Appellate Court by the impugned judgment.3. Case of the plaintiff before the Trial Court was that the suit premises being a shop was given on rent by the plaintiff namely, Late Smt. Kailaso Devi and the respondent No. 3 for monthly rent of Rs. 250/- on the ground that there was an agreement of tenancy executed on 30-9-1987 between the plaintiffs...
Nanku Ram Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Feb-08-2005
Reported in: 2005(3)MPHT33(CG)
ORDERV.K. Shrivastava, J.1. Heard arguments advanced by both the parties.2. The accused/applicant has preferred this bail application under Section 438 of the Cr.PC, for releasing him on anticipatory bail, apprehending arrest in Crime No. 4/2004 registered at Police Station, Ramchandrapur, Dist. Surguja (CG) for commission of offence punishable under Section 420/34 of the IPC.3. In pursuance of directions contained in the order passed under Section 438 of the Cr.PC, granting anticipatory bail for three months or till filing of challan whichever is earlier, the applicant applied for grant of regular bail in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambikapur but vide order dated 7-6-2004 that application has been rejected with a direction that the applicant is on anticipatory bail up to 11-6-2004, therefore, if by that time he obtains order for releasing him on bail from any Competent Court of jurisdiction, he be released, else he be sent to jail alongwith the remand warrant. Thereafter a...