Chhattisgarh Court May 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
KamaruddIn @ Bhaijan and ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and anr.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: May-15-2004
Reported in: 2004(3)MPHT72(CG)
ORDERL.C. Bhadoo, J.1. The petitioners have preferred this petition under Section 482 of the Cr.PC calling in question the validity, propriety and legality of the order dated 26-6-2001 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Durg, whereby the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate took cognizance under Section 190 of the Cr.PC for commission of offences under Sections 341, 323 read with Section 34 of the IPC and directed the Station House Officer, Police Station, Durg to furnish the copies of charge-sheet and the documents of Crime No. 257/2000.2. Brief facts giving rise to filing of this petition are that on 1 -4-2000 the non-applicant No. 2 lodged a report with the Police Station, Durg with the allegations that the accused persons, the petitioners herein, in furtherance of the common intention abused him with filthy language and beaten him with fists and slaps. In the report, he mentioned that the owners of Jyoti Opticals and Surana Videos are his tenants since last 5-6 years and...
Rakesh Vaishnav Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (Now Chhattisgarh)
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: May-13-2004
Reported in: 2004(3)MPHT65(CG)
ORDERL.C. Bhadoo, J.1. The accused/applicant has preferred this criminal revision being aggrieved by the order dated 10-10-1998, passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Baloda Bazaar, in Sessions Trial No. 316/98, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge after perusal of the record ordered for framing of charge for commission of offence under Section 306 of the IPC against the accused/applicant and accordingly, he framed the charge.2. Brief facts giving rise to filing of this criminal revision are that on 19-4-1998, Sub Inspector R.M. Tiwari of Police Station, Baloda Bazaar, received information from the Government Hospital, Baloda Bazaar, that Sanjay Vaishnav, aged about 27 years, resident to Village Risda, was brought to the hospital in unconscious condition and he expired at about 12.10 p.m. He had died on account of consumption of poisonous substance namely, pesticides. On receiving this report, Merg was entered at Serial No. 23/98 and investigation was conducted. During ...
Srinath and Three ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: May-13-2004
Reported in: 2004(4)MPHT1(CG)
ORDERL.C. Bhadoo, J.1. The accused/applicants have preferred this criminal revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Cr.PC, being aggrieved by order dated 14-10-2003 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Pendra Road, in Sessions Trial No. 131/1995, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge rejected the application of the applicants (accused persons) filed under Section 284 of the Cr.PC and refused to issue commission for the examination of Dr. Sudhir Bhave of Nagpur.2. Brief facts giving rise to filing of this criminal revision are that the accused/applicants are facing trial before the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Pendra Road, for commission of offence punishable under Section 306 read with Section 34 of the IPC for abetting Shashi Prabha to commit suicide. It appears that in this case, prosecution closed its evidence and the statement of the accused persons were also recorded under Section 313 of the Cr.PC. The accused ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›