Chhattisgarh Court December 2004 Judgments
Laxminarayan Agrawal and ors. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Dec-20-2004
Reported in: 2005(3)MPHT13(CG)
ORDERSunil Kumar Sinha, J.1. Since the criminal revisions, referred to above, arise out of a common order dated 1-2-2004, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. These revisions under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are directed against the order dated 1-2-2003 passed in Sessions Trial No. 391/2002 by the Sixth Additional Sessions Judge Raipur, District Raipur (CG) whereby she framed the charges under Section 304B and in the alternative under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code against each of the petitioners. Petitioner Nos. 1 to 3 in Cr. Rev. No. 91/2003 are the father-in-law, mother-in-law and the husband of the deceased, whereas petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 of Criminal Revision No. 92 of 2003 are the sister-in-law (Nanad) and brother-in-law (Dewar) of the deceased.3. Briefly stated, facts of the case are that Manish Agrawal was married with Puja, the deceased, on 24-5-2001. The marriage was solemnized at Raipur. After the marriage, Puja...
Tag this Judgment!Parmanand Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Dec-09-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)MPHT61(CG)
ORDERSunil Kumar Sinha, J.1. Heard on the question of admission.Invoking the powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner who is an injured and the first informant in Crime No. 226/2004 registered at Police Station, Akaltara, District Janjgir, Champa (C.G.) has filed this petition for issuance of the following directions :-'It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court should give a suitable direction to the learned Lower Court to consider the charges at the time of framing looking to the merit of the case in regard with Crime No. 226/2004 in the interest of justice.'2. It is stated in the petition that the incident occurred on 17-6-2004 at about 8.30 hours when respondent Nos. 3 to 5 started abusing the petitioner, they also assaulted the petitioner as well as Aruna Bai wife of the petitioner and Mohan son of the petitioner. The report of the said incident was lodged by the petitioner on the same day at about 9.30 hours and the offence puni...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›