Chhattisgarh Court November 2004 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ku. Meena Verma Vs. Board of Secondary Education
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-26-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)MPHT49(CG)
ORDERL.C. Bhadoo, J.1. Ku. Meena Verma, the petitioner herein, appeared in the Higher Secondary School Certificate Examination, 2004 (Class 12th) under the Roll Number 21417321 from Sarvahit Karini Higher Secondary School, Rawaan (Baloda Bazar), District Raipur Examination Center. When the result of the petitioner was declared, she was shocked to know that in the written examination of Physics subject out of 75 marks only 14 marks were awarded to her. Accordingly she applied for re-totalling and rechecking but the respondent-Board informed the petitioner that there is no change in the result. Being not satisfied with the marks awarded to her and the result of rechecking and revaluation, the petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India questioning the correctness of decision of the respondent-Board.2. The case of the petitioner is that she attempted all the questions in the question-papers of all the subjects as per instruction contained...
Mohd. Akram Khan Vs. State of M.P. (Now State of Chhattisgarh)
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-08-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)MPHT29(CG)
L.C. Bhadoo, J.1. The appellant namely Mahmood Akram Khan has preferred this appeal under Section 374(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 26th February, 1999 passed by the Sessions Judge, Raipur, in Sessions Trial No. 15/98 whereby learned Sessions Judge after holding the accused/appellant guilty for commission of the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life.2. Co-accused Mahendra Kumar was also tried with the present accused/appellant for commission of the offence under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code. He was held guilty for commission of the offence under Section 201 of the IPC and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- in default of payment of fine amount to further undergo one month's rigorous imprisonment.3. Briefly stated prosecution case necessary for the disposal of this appeal is that deceased Abdul Gaff...
Gurjeet Singh Mann Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and anr.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-05-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)MPHT25(CG)
ORDERV.K. Shrivastava, J.1. Heard.2. On being financed by respondent No. 2, applicant purchased one Tata Specio vehicle from National Garage, Bilaspur, and agreed to repay the loan to respondent No. 2 through post dated cheques. Later on it was found that National Garage, Bilaspur, cheated him by giving second hand vehicle in place of new one. Therefore, he made a request to respondent No. 2 for taking action against National Garage, Bilaspur, but no action has been taken by respondent No. 2, hence applicant himself lodged a report. On his report crime No. 186/2002 for commission of offence under Sections 420, 467 and 468 read with Section 34 of the IPC was registered against Ravi Kumar Budhiya and four others. Investigating the said crime police seized vehicle from the applicant Gurjeet Singh Mann bearing No. CG-15/6008. For taking back the vehicle on Supurdnama, applicant approached the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ambikapur and the Court after due hearing directed that the ve...
Bijan Bai Vs. Oorisa Bengal Carriers and anr.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-02-2004
Reported in: I(2006)ACC437; 2005ACJ1835
A.S.V. Moorthy, C.J.1. The injured-claimant was coming to Durg from Nagpur in Tata Sumo bearing registration No. MH 31-Z 6089 on 12.4.1999 and when the said vehicle reached near village Urai-Dabari, a truck bearing registration No. MP 23-DA 3456 came from the opposite direction driven in a rash and negligent manner, dashed ,against the Tata Sumo and because of which the appellant and others who were travelling in the said Tata Sumo sustained injuries.2. The appellant filed a Claim Case No. 43 of 1999 claiming compensation of Rs. 11,90,000 under various heads since she had sustained head injury as well as hip injury. The Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs. 35,800. Being aggrieved by the said award, the present appeal has been filed.3. Accident took place because of rash and negligent driving by the driver of the truck bearing registration No. MP 23-DA 3456 is not in dispute now. The only question that remains for consideration is what is the just compensation for which the appellant wo...
Aarti Engineering Company and ors. Vs. Vijay Dwivedi and anr.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Nov-01-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)MPHT19(CG)
ORDERV.K. Shrivastava, J.1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 24-3-2003 passed in Criminal Case No. 1267/2003 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Durg, whereby taking cognizance against the petitioners alongwith another co-accused Vinod Mandhana under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, (for short, 'the Act') the petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Cr.PC for quashing the said order and all subsequent proceedings against the petitioners.2. One partnership firm - Aarti Engineer Company, was constituted on 1-4-1994 comprising partners namely Kanhaiyalal Mandhana, Vinod Mandhana and Smt. Suman Mandhana for carrying the business under the name and style of Aarti Engineering Company. Subsequently, the firm was reconstituted on 1-4-1998 wherein one of the partners namely Vinod Mandhana took retirement and new partner joined in the said firm. Vinod Mandhana issued a cheque dated 1-10-2002 bearing No. 357940 of Canara Bank, Itwari, Nagpur for Rs. 20,00,...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›