Chhattisgarh Court March 2003 Judgments
State of Chhattisgarh Vs. Tirathram and ors.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Mar-31-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)MPHT65(CG)
ORDERL.C. Bhadoo, J.1. This reference has been made by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baloda Bazaar, Raipur, under Section 395 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which has been registered as Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 2636/2001.2. The relevant facts leading up to the reference are that one Criminal Case No. 388/94 (State v. Tirathram and 3 others) for the offences punishable under Sections 324, 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code was pending before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baloda Bazaar, Raipur, in which the charges were framed against the accused persons and matter was fixed for evidence of the prosecution on 4th July, 2000 but the matter was disposed of on 23rd July, 2000 on the basis of the compromise entered between the parties. An application under Section 320(4)(b) of Cr.PC was filed by one Jivan with the averments that he be permitted to compound the offence on behalf of his deceased brother/injured/complainant Firtu alongwith an application ...
Tag this Judgment!M.P. State Road Transport Corporation Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and or ...
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Mar-29-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)MPHT42(CG)
ORDERP.C. Nailk, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed by the M.P. State Road Transport Corporation (Bilaspur) for issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing the order and temporary permit granted to the respondent No. 4 vide Annexure P- 3. Further prayer is for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondent No. 1 not to grant temporary permits to private operators on notified route and in contravention of the orders of the State Chhattisgarh and statutory provisions.2. The respondent No. 4 had applied for a grant of stage carriage permit for the route Ambikapur to Raigarh via. Sitapur, Pathalgaon, Dharam-jaigarh and back. According to the petitioner, the route between Ambikapur and Raigarh is reserved under the nationalized Scheme No. 52 M and clause (g) whereof prohibits private operators from plying their vehicles on the nationalized route. It is the case of the petitioner that in complete contravention of the statutory provisions and settl...
Tag this Judgment!Munna Khan Vs. State of M.P. (Now Chhattisgarh)
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Mar-27-2003
Reported in: 2004CriLJ525; 2003(2)MPHT29(CG)
ORDERL.C. Bhadoo, J.1. This criminal revision has been preferred by accused/applicant Munna Khan being aggrieved by the judgment dated 8th March, 1994, passed by the Seventh Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur, in Criminal Appeal No. 139/91 affirming the judgment dated 28th November, 1991, in Criminal Case No. 1023/89, passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Raipur, by which he convicted the accused/applicant under Section 304A of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine to undergo further simple imprisonment for one month.2. The undisputed relevant facts for the disposal of this criminal revision are that on 29th October, 1984, deceased-Roshanlal Gupta along with complainant-Jamuna Prasad and other passengers boarded the truck bearing registration No. CPT/2598 at Village Bhesmudi to travel by truck up to Village Kharora. The driver of the said truck was the present accused/app...
Tag this Judgment!Mehandi Lal Yadav Vs. the State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Mar-12-2003
Reported in: 2004CriLJ710
ORDERL.C. Bhadoo, J.1. This criminal revision has been preferred by accused Mehndi Lal Yadav being aggrieved by the order dated 2nd December, 2002 passed by the Special Judge (Prevention of Atrocities) Ambikapur, Sarguja by which the learned Special Judge has framed the charge against the accused/ applicant for the offences punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (which will be referred here-inalier as the Act 1989').2. The relevant facts for the disposal of this criminal revision are that on 2nd December, 2001 the prosecutrix Yogeshwari Mandavi lodged a report in the police station Ambikapur with the allegation that she is resident of Tikarapara District-Kanker, on 13th November, 1999 when she was working with Marg Dershak Seva Sansathan, Mission Chowk, Ambikapur as a full time worker she came in contact with Mehndi Lal Yadav in his office and on that day Mehandi Lal...
Tag this Judgment!Ravindra Kumar Mishra and anr. Vs. Dular Ram and ors.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Mar-12-2003
Reported in: 2004ACJ1727; 2003(3)MPHT45(CG)
Fakhruddin, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. The appellants filed a claim application before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal on the ground that an accident had occurred on 1st February, 1981.3. It is stated that the appellants while going from Bhilainagar to Raipur on a motorcycle, were dashed badly by the respondent No. 1 - Dular Ram, who was driving Vehicle No. C.P.R. 8394 rashly and negligently, as a result of, accident had occurred and the appellants' sustained injuries. They were admitted in D.K. Hospital, Raipur. A report of this accident was lodged. Challan was filed against the driver and he was prosecuted. A Criminal Case No. 1515/81 was also registered against the driver in which he pleaded guilty and a fine of Rs. 350/- was imposed on him. During the accident the appellants have sustained injuries on various parts of their body. An application under Section 110(A)(3) was filed for condonation of delay in preferring the claim.4. Notices were issued of this a...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- Next ›