Chhattisgarh Court June 2002 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
SachIn Sharma Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jun-21-2002
Reported in: 2002(5)MPHT12(CG)
ORDERFakhruddin, J.1. Heard.2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, alleging that though the petitioner was the highest tenderer but his tender has not been accepted illegally and he has been subjected to selective discrimination and his offer has not been accepted and the respondents have proceeded to have new auction by inviting fresh tenders in respect of Chucuhiyapara country liquor shop. It is alleged that even proper information has not been given to the petitioner and proper publication of the notice was not made.3. Notices were given to the respondents, who have filed their reply and relevant record was produced. The contention of the respondents is that they have reauctioned the aforesaid country liquor shop, as the price offered was not upto the expectation.4. Notice dated 18-6-2002 which is in the record produced by the State Counsel goes to show that the Additional Collector (Excise) invited tenders upto 3.00 p.m. on...
Gajpati Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jun-21-2002
Reported in: 2003(2)MPHT72(CG)
ORDERFakhruddin, J.1. Heard.2. This is the third bail application. The first one was dismissed on22-12-2000 directing as under:--'After arguing the case, learned Counsel for the applicant seeks to withdraw the petition.Petition is accordingly dismissed.The applicant is forewarned that he shall not move an application under Section 438, Cr.PC, before the Lower Court as he is not pressing his application before the High Court.'3. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is a teacher , and if he is arrested his interest will be adversely affected.4. Learned Counsel for the State on the other hand submits that there are allegations against him. The prosecution story is that on 6th Sept., 2000 at 9.30 p.m. in Village Khajari, meeting was called where the hands and legs of complainant Tukaram were tied and then he was beaten and his tongue has been cut by knife and there are also piercing injury in eye of the victim. The dying declaration of Tukaram was recorded on 7-9-2000 where...
Parasnath Tiwari Vs. Central Reserve Police Force and anr.
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Jun-17-2002
Reported in: 2003CriLJ1667
ORDERFakhruddin, J.1. Heard.2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is father of S.K. Tiwari, who was a member of Central Reserve Police Force. S.K. Tiwari (Constable No. 800650815) was posted as Constable at Bhubaneshwar. An information was sent to the petitioner that his son died in an accident and his last rites have been performed. Thereafter, another letter was received by the petitioner that his son was done to death by fellow Constables. It is submitted that the petitioner is an old man of 75 years and is sick and infirm. The petitioner's wife (mother of the soldier) is also aged about 72 years old, infirm and on death-bed. Both of them are not able to walk. It is also submitted that some dues legally payable to the petitioner's son have not yet been paid.3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the parents of deceased S.K. Tiwari are old. Smt. Savitri Devi Tiwari (mother of deceased S.K. Tiwari) received an information to attend Vidhva Kalyan Diwas. ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›